Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Questioning the Promise of Dialogic Feedback: Engagement Challenges Across Proficiency Levels in EFL Writing

Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 437–463

DOI
10.24903/sj.v11i2.2477
ISSN
2502-6623, 2477-1880
Terbit
2026-08-19
Penerbit
Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda University
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Background: Although dialogic feedback has received increasing attention in EFL writing research, little is known about whether students with different proficiency levels experience similar engagement challenges during dialogic feedback. This study aims to explore the engagement challenges experienced by low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency EFL students. Methodology: This study employed a qualitative multiple-case study design involving six undergraduate EFL students at an Indonesian public university. Participants were purposively selected based on their proficiency levels from an in-house essay diagnostic test assessed using the IELTS Writing Task 2 band scale (1–9). Students scoring below Band 3 were classified as A1 (low proficiency), while those scoring Band 4–5 were classified as B1 (intermediate proficiency). Three students from each group were selected to form two contrasting cases. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically using within-case and cross-case comparisons. Findings: The findings revealed both shared and proficiency-specific engagement challenges among the six participants. Both low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency students experienced unclear feedback, revisions limited to lecturer corrections, and low self-confidence. However, low-proficiency students also faced dependence on lecturer authority, difficulty transferring feedback to future writing tasks, limited clarification-seeking, inadequate preparation, and greater fear and anxiety during feedback interactions. In contrast, intermediate-proficiency students mainly experienced inconsistent clarification-seeking, anxiety related to extensive revisions, and sensitivity to lecturers’ attitudes and appreciation. Conclusion: The findings suggest that engagement challenges during dialogic feedback vary across proficiency levels. Common challenges were evident in both groups, whereas proficiency-specific challenges reflected differences in students’ experiences and support needs. Therefore, dialogic feedback should be adapted to accommodate these differences in order to promote more effective student engagement. Originality: This study contributes to the dialogic feedback literature by providing insights into engagement challenges during dialogic feedback interactions among low- and intermediate-proficiency EFL students in an Indonesian higher education context. It extends previous proficiency-based research by highlighting how students at different proficiency levels experience and navigate challenges in dialogic feedback.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 92 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 51 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Makassar
  • Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Widya Gama Mahakam University
  • Universitas Sulawesi Barat
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sakaria SakariaState University of Makassar2
Fauzan Hari Sudding SallyState University of Makassar2
Sukardi WedaState University of Makassar1
Andi Elsa Fadhilah SaktiHasanuddin University1
Abdullah AbdullahState University of Makassar1
Nurlinda NurlindaState University of Makassar1
Mega SyafitriState University of Makassar1
Munir MunirState University of Makassar1
Sugurawati AbubakarState University of Makassar1
Baso JabuState University of Makassar1
Anwar SewangSekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Majene1
Fortunasari FortunasariUniversitas Jambi1
Dairabi KamilInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci1
Marzul HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Safnil ArsyadUniversity of Bengkulu1
Syarifuddin DollahState University of Makassar1
Jamaluddin AhmadUniversitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang1
La SunraState University of Makassar1
Munir MunirSunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung1
Maemuna MuhayyangState University of Makassar1
Muhammad BasriState University of Makassar1
Ahmed SardiState University of Makassar1
Abd RahmanHasanuddin University1
Muhammad Astrianto SetiadiState University of Makassar1
Fahmi GunawanInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Arbain ArbainWidya Gama Mahakam University1
Dzul RachmanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur1
Saltanat MeiramovaEurasian Humanities Institute1
Dedi Rahman NurWidya Gama Mahakam University1
Aswadi AswadiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang1
Nurhusna NurhusnaState University of Makassar1
Harnita RosaliaState University of Makassar1
Abdullah AbdullahUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Muhammad BasriUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Agussalim DjirongState University of Makassar1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/Script/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Questioning the Promise of Dialogic Feedback: Engagement Challenges Across Proficiency Levels in EFL Writing</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurchalis, Nur Fadillah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Noni, Nurdin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sakkir, Geminastiti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ariyani, Amra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Aswad, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Challenges</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Dialogic Feedback</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">EFL Writing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Proficiency</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Students’ Engagement</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Background: 
Although dialogic feedback has received increasing attention in EFL writing research, little is known about whether students with different proficiency levels experience similar engagement challenges during dialogic feedback. This study aims to explore the engagement challenges experienced by low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency EFL students.
Methodology: 
This study employed a qualitative multiple-case study design involving six undergraduate EFL students at an Indonesian public university. Participants were purposively selected based on their proficiency levels from an in-house essay diagnostic test assessed using the IELTS Writing Task 2 band scale (1–9). Students scoring below Band 3 were classified as A1 (low proficiency), while those scoring Band 4–5 were classified as B1 (intermediate proficiency). Three students from each group were selected to form two contrasting cases. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically using within-case and cross-case comparisons.
Findings: 
The findings revealed both shared and proficiency-specific engagement challenges among the six participants. Both low-proficiency and intermediate-proficiency students experienced unclear feedback, revisions limited to lecturer corrections, and low self-confidence. However, low-proficiency students also faced dependence on lecturer authority, difficulty transferring feedback to future writing tasks, limited clarification-seeking, inadequate preparation, and greater fear and anxiety during feedback interactions. In contrast, intermediate-proficiency students mainly experienced inconsistent clarification-seeking, anxiety related to extensive revisions, and sensitivity to lecturers’ attitudes and appreciation.
Conclusion: 
The findings suggest that engagement challenges during dialogic feedback vary across proficiency levels. Common challenges were evident in both groups, whereas proficiency-specific challenges reflected differences in students’ experiences and support needs. Therefore, dialogic feedback should be adapted to accommodate these differences in order to promote more effective student engagement.
Originality: 
This study contributes to the dialogic feedback literature by providing insights into engagement challenges during dialogic feedback interactions among low- and intermediate-proficiency EFL students in an Indonesian higher education context. It extends previous proficiency-based research by highlighting how students at different proficiency levels experience and navigate challenges in dialogic feedback.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Teacher Training and Education Faculty, Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/Script/article/view/2477</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.24903/sj.v11i2.2477</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): August ; 437-463</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-6623</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2477-1880</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.24903/sj.v11i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal.fkip-uwgm.ac.id/index.php/Script/article/view/2477/1224</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Nur Fadillah Nurchalis, Nurdin Noni, Geminastiti Sakkir, Amra Ariyani, Muhammad Aswad</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>