Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Inability of Protecting Diplomats: Problems of Afghanistan and Conflict Countries

Sriwijaya Law Review · Vol. UME (2018) · hlm. 18–44

DOI
10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss1.108.pp18-44
ISSN
2541-6464, 2541-5298
Terbit
2018-01-31
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This article discusses the protection of diplomats and state responsibility of physical suffering of diplomats in conflict countries, especially in Afghanistan using juridical normative methodology. This concern has to be discussed because there are a lot of attacks and physical harms suffered by the diplomats, especially in armed-conflict countries. This article analyzes the practices of protection of diplomats in some conflict countries and explain the conventions that include protection of diplomats as a part of the conventions. Thus, conflict countries are more tendentious than non-conflict countries in terms of numbers of attacks and physical harms suf-fered by diplomats. Therefore, this article analyzes the conflict country and categorizes the terms and conditions in the conflict countries. After looking into the pattern of protection of dip-lomats in some countries, this article analyzes the response shown by the receiving and sending state. There is also a discussion of the attacked diplomat cases in Afghanistan and the responses issued by the related parties. Then, protection of the diplomats and state responsibility are ana-lyzed based on the related doctrine and conventions. Changes in protection of diplomats in Af-ghanistan should be done and Afghanistan should be more concerned about this matter and based on the diplomatic convention, sending state could file a dispute settlement to an arbitrary organ and International Court of Justice to claim state responsibility. Based on the conventions and doctrine related, Afghanistan could be charged as the full responsible party

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

23 penulis · 37 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Indonesia
  • Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia
  • Universitas Jambi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Arie AfriansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Hadi Rahmat PurnamaUniversity of Indonesia2
Anbar JayadiUniversity of Indonesia1
Angela VaniaUniversity of Indonesia1
Salsabila Siliwangi SurtiwaUniversity of Indonesia1
Topo SantosoUniversity of Indonesia1
Febby Mutiara NelsonUniversity of Indonesia1
Mohd Hazmi Mohd RusliUniversiti Sains Islam Malaysia1
Bintang Wicaksono AjieUniversity of Indonesia1
Sakina FakhriahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sakina FakhriahUniversity of Indonesia1
M. Ikhsan LapadenganAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Ikhsan LapadenganUniversity of Indonesia1
Mutiara WindraskinasihUniversity of Indonesia1
Rizky Banyualam PermanaUniversity of Indonesia1
Rizka IswaraUniversity of Indonesia1
Gledys Deyana WahyudinUniversity of Indonesia1
Igor YosoUniversity of Indonesia1
Akbar Kurnia PutraUniversitas Jambi1
Yetty Komalasari DewiUniversity of Indonesia1
Elisabeth ArdiastutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Inability of Protecting Diplomats: Problems of Afghanistan and Conflict Countries</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sukarmaji, Ananda Kurniawan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Afriansyah, Arie</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Protection of Diplomats</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">State Responsibility</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Conflict Countries</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Afghanistan</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This article discusses the protection of diplomats and state responsibility of physical suffering of diplomats in conflict countries, especially in Afghanistan using juridical normative methodology. This concern has to be discussed because there are a lot of attacks and physical harms suffered by the diplomats, especially in armed-conflict countries. This article analyzes the practices of protection of diplomats in some conflict countries and explain the conventions that include protection of diplomats as a part of the conventions. Thus, conflict countries are more tendentious than non-conflict countries in terms of numbers of attacks and physical harms suf-fered by diplomats. Therefore, this article analyzes the conflict country and categorizes the terms and conditions in the conflict countries. After looking into the pattern of protection of dip-lomats in some countries, this article analyzes the response shown by the receiving and sending state. There is also a discussion of the attacked diplomat cases in Afghanistan and the responses issued by the related parties. Then, protection of the diplomats and state responsibility are ana-lyzed based on the related doctrine and conventions. Changes in protection of diplomats in Af-ghanistan should be done and Afghanistan should be more concerned about this matter and based on the diplomatic convention, sending state could file a dispute settlement to an arbitrary organ and International Court of Justice to claim state responsibility. Based on the conventions and doctrine related, Afghanistan could be charged as the full responsible party</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-01-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/108</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.28946/slrev.Vol2.Iss1.108.pp18-44</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Sriwijaya Law Review; VOLUME 2, ISSUE 1, JANUARY 2018; 18-44</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-6464</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-5298</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/108/71</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Sriwijaya Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>