Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

The Qualified Effects Doctrine in the Extraterritorial of Competition Law Application: An Indonesia Perspective

Sriwijaya Law Review · Vol. ume (2021) · hlm. 192–204

DOI
10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1050.pp192-204
ISSN
2541-6464, 2541-5298
Terbit
2021-07-28
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The use of extraterritorial jurisdiction of competition law, based on the effect doctrine, has long been debated. This paper discusses the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction to Indonesian competition law. Competition law in Indonesia applies to any collusive or abusive behaviour that has a necessary effect on the business and economy spheres, regardless of the nationality or geographic location of the company or where the occurred conduct. This study employs a normative juridical method to analyse legal norms and principles. The approaches used include a statutory approach, a comparative law approach, and a case approach. This study reveals that the regulations concerning the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition have not explicitly regulated extraterritorial norms in Indonesia. However, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission makes legal breakthroughs by applying the extraterritorial principle to resolve the involvement of foreign business actors and impose penalties on them. This article argues that Indonesia significantly needs to amend its competition law and increase cooperation with other countries to enforce the competition law.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

39 penulis · 92 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • University of Mataram
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Kukuh TejomurtiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Setyo WidagdoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Adi KusumaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Elisabeth Septin PuspoayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Moh. FadliAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Jundiani JundianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yenny Eta WidyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Erfaniah ZuhriahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah Dwi QurbaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SITI HAMIDAHAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afrizal Mukti WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ranitya GanindhaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Azahlia UmarAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ikaningtyas IkaningtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Choirul HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Herman SuryokumoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Patricia Audrey RuslijantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yudhi Tri PermonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dody Novizar MardyansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dhiana PuspitawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mohd Hazmi Mohd RusliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rangga Vandy WardanaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Wayan Firdaus MahmudyUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mohamad Rivaldi MohaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afifah KusumadaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prija DjatmikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Nugrahayu DeviantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
AHNIA SEPTYA KARINAAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Endang Sri KawuryanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Budi SantosoUniversity of Mataram1
Hanif Nur WidhiyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amelia Sri Kusuma DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Theta MurtyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hikam HulwanullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah Dwi QurbaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Qualified Effects Doctrine in the Extraterritorial of Competition Law Application: An Indonesia Perspective</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sukarmi, Sukarmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Qaqaya, Hassan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Susanto, Fransiska A.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kurniaty, Rika</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Extraterritorial Princi-ples</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Business Competi-tion</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Law Enforcement</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Indonesia practice</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The use of extraterritorial jurisdiction of competition law, based on the effect doctrine, has long been debated. This paper discusses the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction to Indonesian competition law. Competition law in Indonesia applies to any collusive or abusive behaviour that has a necessary effect on the business and economy spheres, regardless of the nationality or geographic location of the company or where the occurred conduct. This study employs a normative juridical method to analyse legal norms and principles. The approaches used include a statutory approach, a comparative law approach, and a case approach. This study reveals that the regulations concerning the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition have not explicitly regulated extraterritorial norms in Indonesia. However, the Business Competition Supervisory Commission makes legal breakthroughs by applying the extraterritorial principle to resolve the involvement of foreign business actors and impose penalties on them. This article argues that Indonesia significantly needs to amend its competition law and increase cooperation with other countries to enforce the competition law.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-07-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/msword</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/1050</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss2.1050.pp192-204</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Sriwijaya Law Review; Volume 5 Issue 2, July 2021; 192-204</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-6464</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-5298</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/1050/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/1050/973</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Sriwijaya Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>