Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Enhancing Consumer Protection in Electronic Transactions in Indonesia

Sriwijaya Law Review · Vol. ume (2025) · hlm. 194–207

DOI
10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3942.pp194-207
ISSN
2541-6464, 2541-5298
Terbit
2025-01-31
Penerbit
Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Technological advancements have significantly facilitated electronic transactions, making business interactions faster and more convenient. However, these developments also introduce risks, especially for consumers, as electronic transactions can lead to significant financial losses if not handled carefully. This study proposes effective legal protections for consumers to prevent such losses and ensure proper compensation in electronic business transactions. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing both a statutory and conceptual approach. The statutory approach analyses laws and regulations governing electronic transactions, while the conceptual approach applies Richard Posner's Economic Analysis of Law theory to assess the efficiency of consumer protection mechanisms. Data was gathered through a literature review of primary and secondary legal sources, and conclusions were drawn using deductive reasoning. The Economic Analysis of Law theory was the major premise, with relevant laws and regulations forming the minor premise. The findings reveal two main conclusions. First, while existing laws such as the Consumer Protection Law, the ITE Law, PP PMSE, PP PSTE, and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 31 of 2023 provide basic consumer protection by sanctioning businesses that offer mismatched products, reclaiming consumer rights is not straightforward. Second, to mitigate potential losses in electronic transactions, a validation process for business actors is necessary before they offer products, and Electronic System Trading Providers (PPMSE) must establish an efficient mechanism for compensating consumer losses. This study highlights the need for a more robust and accessible framework to protect consumers in electronic business transactions, ensuring that legal recourse is both efficient and effective.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

24 penulis · 48 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 21 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law Foundation
  • Thammasat University
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Tashkent State University of Law
  • University of Mataram
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniSebelas Maret University6
Ravi DanendraOñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law Foundation2
Nabila Rahma SafitriUIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta2
Mohd Rizal PalilNational University of Malaysia2
Albertus Sentot SudarwantoSebelas Maret University1
Arifin Ma’arufAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Henning GlaserThammasat University1
Sulistyanta SulistyantaSebelas Maret University1
Abdul WahidHasanuddin University1
Yasser ArafatSebelas Maret University1
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniSebelas Maret University1
Ilham Aji PangestuSebelas Maret University1
Nuralievich RuzinazarovTashkent State University of Law1
Maria Pricilia SilvianaSebelas Maret University1
HartiwiningsihSebelas Maret University1
Fauzi IswariSebelas Maret University1
Adi SulistiyonoSebelas Maret University1
M. Yazid FathoniUniversity of Mataram1
Dararida Fandra MahiraUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani I GustiSebelas Maret University1
Jadmiko Anom HusodoSebelas Maret University1
Annisa Fianni SismaSebelas Maret University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Enhancing Consumer Protection in Electronic Transactions in Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rosidah, Zaidah Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Karjoko, Lego</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Responsibility</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Losses</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Business Actors</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Consumers</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">E-commerce</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Reliability Certificates.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Technological advancements have significantly facilitated electronic transactions, making business interactions faster and more convenient. However, these developments also introduce risks, especially for consumers, as electronic transactions can lead to significant financial losses if not handled carefully. This study proposes effective legal protections for consumers to prevent such losses and ensure proper compensation in electronic business transactions. This research employs a normative legal methodology, utilizing both a statutory and conceptual approach. The statutory approach analyses laws and regulations governing electronic transactions, while the conceptual approach applies Richard Posner's Economic Analysis of Law theory to assess the efficiency of consumer protection mechanisms. Data was gathered through a literature review of primary and secondary legal sources, and conclusions were drawn using deductive reasoning. The Economic Analysis of Law theory was the major premise, with relevant laws and regulations forming the minor premise. The findings reveal two main conclusions. First, while existing laws such as the Consumer Protection Law, the ITE Law, PP PMSE, PP PSTE, and Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 31 of 2023 provide basic consumer protection by sanctioning businesses that offer mismatched products, reclaiming consumer rights is not straightforward. Second, to mitigate potential losses in electronic transactions, a validation process for business actors is necessary before they offer products, and Electronic System Trading Providers (PPMSE) must establish an efficient mechanism for compensating consumer losses. This study highlights the need for a more robust and accessible framework to protect consumers in electronic business transactions, ensuring that legal recourse is both efficient and effective.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-01-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/msword</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/3942</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3942.pp194-207</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Sriwijaya Law Review; Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2025; 194-207</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-6464</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2541-5298</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/3942/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/3942/1094</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Sriwijaya Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>