Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Single-Candidate Local Elections in Indonesia: Electoral Cartelization, the Empty Box, and Siyasah Dusturiyyah

Syariah Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran · Vol. 26 No. 2 (2026) · hlm. 297–320

DOI
10.18592/sjhp.v26i2.20561
ISSN
2549-001X, 1412-6303
Terbit
2026-10-26
Penerbit
Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This study examines the legal problems and democratic implications of single-candidate regional elections in Indonesia’s 2024 Simultaneous Regional Elections, in which 37 regions had only one candidate pair. Although Constitutional Court Decision Number 100/PUU-XIII/2015 and Articles 54C–54D of Law Number 10 of 2016 provide a legal basis for conducting elections through an empty-box mechanism, the existing framework leaves unresolved questions concerning the legal consequences of an empty-box victory and the possible re-nomination of a candidate defeated by the empty box. This study addresses that gap by developing a conditional-legitimacy test linking constitutional law, electoral competition, and siyāsah dustūriyyah. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative-law approaches. The primary legal materials consist of Constitutional Court decisions, legislation, General Elections Commission regulations, and relevant scholarship on democracy, electoral cartelization, and Islamic constitutional theory. The study finds that single-candidate elections are not automatically unconstitutional or inherently incompatible with Islamic political principles. Their legitimacy instead depends on the openness of nomination, the availability of meaningful political choice, the effectiveness of the right to reject through the empty box, and the accountability of the resulting leadership. The limited comparative analysis identifies Indonesia’s mechanism as a distinct institutional design because an empty-box victory may produce a binding legal consequence, although the rules governing renewed nomination remain inadequate. The study recommends an open repeat election with renewed candidate registration, greater decentralization of the nomination process, and separate national and local electoral calendars. Its conclusions regarding democratization and participation are normative inferences rather than statistically established causal claims.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

39 penulis · 86 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 4 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • STKIP Paracendekia NW Sumbawa
  • Universitas Pertamina
  • Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
M. Fahmi Al AmruziAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Alias AzharAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rita AstarinaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka Sri Indah YaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nilam SariUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Sa'adatul HijriahUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Nevi HasnitaUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Zyaul FitraUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Muhammad AbdillahUniversitas Pertamina1
Henky FernandoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Shinta Dewi RismawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jemmi Angga SaputraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdulah Safe’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus MulyantoUniversitas Teknokrat Indonesia1
Sayid Muhammad Rifki NovalAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ulfiah UlfiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
HermansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad JaelaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dede Yuda Wahyu NurhudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Marisa PuspitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Solihin SolihinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Iwan JazadiSTKIP Paracendekia NW Sumbawa1
Aris Dwi Intan ApriantiSTKIP Paracendekia NW Sumbawa1
Elli MarlianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dita Rezkia UtamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Effendy ArifHasanuddin University1
Rustan TarakkaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad Rasyidi HalimAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M HanafiahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
A. Hafiz Anshary AZAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhammad Hafiz bin BadarulzamanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gusti MuzainahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muhsin AseriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Single-Candidate Local Elections in Indonesia: Electoral Cartelization, the Empty Box, and Siyasah Dusturiyyah</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rosidin, Utang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Barkah, Qodariah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mursid, Fadillah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Jalaluddin, Jalaluddin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wahyudin, M. Yahya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Dozan, M. Rio</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Regional Elections; Single Candidate; Empty Box; Siyasah Dusturiyyah; Conditional Legitimacy.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study examines the legal problems and democratic implications of single-candidate regional elections in Indonesia’s 2024 Simultaneous Regional Elections, in which 37 regions had only one candidate pair. Although Constitutional Court Decision Number 100/PUU-XIII/2015 and Articles 54C–54D of Law Number 10 of 2016 provide a legal basis for conducting elections through an empty-box mechanism, the existing framework leaves unresolved questions concerning the legal consequences of an empty-box victory and the possible re-nomination of a candidate defeated by the empty box. This study addresses that gap by developing a conditional-legitimacy test linking constitutional law, electoral competition, and siyāsah dustūriyyah. It employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative-law approaches. The primary legal materials consist of Constitutional Court decisions, legislation, General Elections Commission regulations, and relevant scholarship on democracy, electoral cartelization, and Islamic constitutional theory. The study finds that single-candidate elections are not automatically unconstitutional or inherently incompatible with Islamic political principles. Their legitimacy instead depends on the openness of nomination, the availability of meaningful political choice, the effectiveness of the right to reject through the empty box, and the accountability of the resulting leadership. The limited comparative analysis identifies Indonesia’s mechanism as a distinct institutional design because an empty-box victory may produce a binding legal consequence, although the rules governing renewed nomination remain inadequate. The study recommends an open repeat election with renewed candidate registration, greater decentralization of the nomination process, and separate national and local electoral calendars. Its conclusions regarding democratization and participation are normative inferences rather than statistically established causal claims.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/20561</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.18592/sjhp.v26i2.20561</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2026); 297-320</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id-ID">Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran; Vol 26 No 2 (2026); 297-320</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2549-001X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1412-6303</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>http://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/syariah/article/view/20561/5202</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Utang Rosidin Utang, Qodariah Barkah, Fadillah Mursid, Jalaluddin Jalaluddin, M. Yahya Wahyudin, M. Rio Dozan</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>