Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Third Party's Asset Confiscation in Corruption Crime

Yuridika · Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018) · hlm. 469–494

DOI
10.20473/ydk.v33i3.8427
ISSN
2528-3103, 0215-840X
Terbit
2018-10-01
Penerbit
Universitas Airlangga
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The article is intended to analyze and find the idea of legal philosophy foundation and develop the concept of proceeds confiscation of corruption crime are enjoyed by a third party, and find the ratio decidendi some of the verdicts related to asset confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, compared with asset confiscation that preceded seizure at the level of investigation. The article found three findings. First, the philosophy foundation of asset confiscation against third parties is in order to maximize the return of state losses due to corruption. Second, the ratio decidendi verdicts related to assets confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, such that verdicts were not contrary to th laws, human rights and justice. The interpretation of the provisions of Article 19 in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Criminal as amended by Law Number 20 Year 2001 provides an opportunity asset confiscation to a third party as long as the third party is not good manner. Third, to find advice for legal reform of the provisions regarding on confiscation to third party in corruption crime in order that is not touch with the third party's rights as a subjek of asset confiscation.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

4 penulis · 4 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Hafied CangaraHasanuddin University1
Andi Alimuddin UndeAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Asari Suci MaharaniUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Third Party's Asset Confiscation in Corruption Crime</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Supardi, Supardi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Asset Confiscation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">The Third Party</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Seizure</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Bad Faith.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The article is intended to analyze and find the idea of legal philosophy foundation  and develop the concept of proceeds confiscation of corruption crime are enjoyed by a third party, and find the ratio decidendi some of the verdicts related to asset confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, compared with asset confiscation that preceded seizure at the level of investigation. The article found three findings. First, the philosophy foundation of asset confiscation  against third parties is in order to maximize the return of state losses due to corruption. Second, the ratio decidendi verdicts related to assets confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, such that verdicts were not contrary to th laws, human rights and justice. The interpretation of the provisions of Article 19 in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Criminal as amended by Law Number 20 Year 2001 provides an opportunity asset confiscation  to a third party as long as  the third party is not good manner.  Third, to find advice  for legal reform of the provisions regarding  on confiscation to third party in corruption crime in order  that is not touch  with the third party's rights as  a subjek of asset confiscation.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-10-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/ydk.v33i3.8427</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018): Volume 33 No 3 September 2018; 469-494</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-3103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-840X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427/pdf_1</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Yuridika</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>