Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

The Annexation of The General Judiciary Against Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency

Yuridika · Vol. 36 No. 1 (2021) · hlm. 157–176

DOI
10.20473/ydk.v36i1.21892
ISSN
2528-3103, 0215-840X
Terbit
2021-01-01
Penerbit
Universitas Airlangga
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

This article aims to analyze the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) as Quasi-Judicial in handling consumer disputes as mandated in Article 49 paragraph (1) of Law No. 8 of 1999. This research is a normative legal study that is prescriptive and technical/applied. The research approach uses the Act approach. This legal research material uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials through library research is then analyzed using qualitative methods. Supervision of the default clause stipulated in the credit agreement is the authority of BPSK; since 2013, the Supreme Court has consistently dismissed consumer disputes for credit agreements positioned as ordinary agreements, stating the parties to the dispute should take their case to the general Judiciary, as well as correcting BPSK's authority. This not only does not imply the principle of lex specialis derogate lex religious but also does not implement efficiency theory that ultimately harms consumers.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

13 penulis · 24 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 15 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Diponegoro University
  • Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Alfalah University
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
  • University of Bristol
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sukarni SuryaningsihDiponegoro University3
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi HandayaniSebelas Maret University1
Sultoni FikriUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya1
Imranullah AkhtarAlfalah University1
Agus RiwantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Noor HarisudinUniversitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember1
Viddy FirmandiazUniversity of Bristol1
Adi Nur RohmanUniversitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya1
Nursaidah NursaidahUniversitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya1
Delasari Krisda PutriUtrecht University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Annexation of The General Judiciary Against Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Handayani, Otih</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Riwanto, Agus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rahayu, Panti</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">BPSK</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Authority</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Consumer Disputes</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This article aims to analyze the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) as Quasi-Judicial in handling consumer disputes as mandated in Article 49 paragraph (1) of Law No. 8 of 1999. This research is a normative legal study that is prescriptive and technical/applied. The research approach uses the Act approach. This legal research material uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials through library research is then analyzed using qualitative methods. Supervision of the default clause stipulated in the credit agreement is the authority of BPSK; since 2013, the Supreme Court has consistently dismissed consumer disputes for credit agreements positioned as ordinary agreements, stating the parties to the dispute should take their case to the general Judiciary, as well as correcting BPSK's authority. This not only does not imply the principle of lex specialis derogate lex religious but also does not implement efficiency theory that ultimately harms consumers.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-01-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/21892</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/ydk.v36i1.21892</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol. 36 No. 1 (2021): Volume 36 No 1 January 2021; 157-176</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-3103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-840X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/21892/13188</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Yuridika</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>