Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Medical Malpractice in the United States of America: Lessons to Learn for Indonesia

Yuridika · Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 365–380

DOI
10.20473/ydk.v36i2.24591
ISSN
2528-3103, 0215-840X
Terbit
2021-05-01
Penerbit
Universitas Airlangga
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Abstrak

Many countries have established a system that serves the liability and settlement of medical malpractice disputes in response to rising medical malpractice claims against doctors. The medical malpractice system in the United States of America (USA) is relatively well developed compared to other countries. Besides the pretrial screening process in medical malpractice litigation, various alternatives to litigation have been developed in the USA. This paper aims to explore the development of the medical malpractice system in the USA and the lessons Indonesia can learn from it. This normative legal research relies on secondary data, particularly online sources. It found that Indonesia can adopt some initiatives in the USA to improve its medical malpractice system, especially the pretrial screening panel. The pretrial screening process is expected to eliminate frivolous claims and reduce unnecessary legal actions against doctors.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

6 penulis · 8 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
  • University of Szeged
  • Asia University
  • Sultan Zainal Abidin University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rizaldy AnggriawanUniversity of Szeged2
Nazzela Jeanny AndrianAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ming-Hsi SungAsia University1
Dwilani IrryntaMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Wan Nurainun Najwa Binti SulaimanSultan Zainal Abidin University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Medical Malpractice in the United States of America: Lessons to  Learn for Indonesia</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Susila, Muh Endriyo</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Medical Malpractice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Medical Malpractice System</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">the USA</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Indonesia</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Many countries have established a system that serves the liability and settlement of medical malpractice disputes in response to rising medical malpractice claims against doctors. The medical malpractice system in the United States of America (USA) is relatively well developed compared to other countries. Besides the pretrial screening process in medical malpractice litigation, various alternatives to litigation have been developed in the USA. This paper aims to explore the development of the medical malpractice system in the USA and the lessons Indonesia can learn from it. This normative legal research relies on secondary data, particularly online sources. It found that Indonesia can adopt some initiatives in the USA to improve its medical malpractice system, especially the pretrial screening panel. The pretrial screening process is expected to eliminate frivolous claims and reduce unnecessary legal actions against doctors.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-05-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/24591</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/ydk.v36i2.24591</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Volume 36 No 2 May 2021; 365-380</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-3103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-840X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/24591/14363</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Yuridika</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>