Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Powers and Limits of the State During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Critical Appraisal

Yuridika · Vol. 36 No. 3 (2021) · hlm. 645–672

DOI
10.20473/ydk.v36i3.26600
ISSN
2528-3103, 0215-840X
Terbit
2021-09-01
Penerbit
Universitas Airlangga
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

Abstrak

The research aims to analyse the powers and limits of the State and whether Indonesia has properly adopted the concept of powers and limits during the state of emergency concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. The article adopted the normative legal research method, using the statute and case approaches for data analysis. The results show that a State may apply some types of power during an emergency. However, in using its powers, the government must consider the limits during a state of emergency. Indonesia has not properly adopted a balance of powers and limits during the state of emergency concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. While the government may take actions to respond to the pandemic, it cannot exceed the limitations on powers in accordance with the state of emergency principles. The State has tended to exceed the limits during the pandemic. In doing so, the State violated some state of emergency principles during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as temporariness, the rule of law, necessity, proportionally, intangibility, constitutionalism, harmony and supervision. The research recommends that in the future, the government and the House of Representatives (DPR) should obey the state of emergency principles, particularly in terms of State power limits to respect constitutional principles and the rule of law. In addition, individuals, groups of people or organisations may request judicial review of laws or regulations during a pandemic that violate the state of emergency principles to protect the fundamental rights of citizens.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

18 penulis · 39 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 14 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta
  • International Islamic University Malaysia
  • University of Szeged
  • University of Glasgow
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Tanto LailamMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta4
Rofi Aulia RahmanUniversity of Szeged2
Farid Sufian ShuaibInternational Islamic University Malaysia2
Khairil Azmin MokhtarInternational Islamic University Malaysia1
Hasrin JamrudinMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Yeni WidowatyMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Nanik PrasetyoningsihMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Fikram RettobUniversity of Glasgow1
Muhammad Amrullah Drs NasrulInternational Islamic University Malaysia1
Siti Fatimah Binti Abd. RahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurin Athirah Mohd Alam ShahInternational Islamic University Malaysia1
Yordan GunawanMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Jamilah ArifinMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Ananda Prasetya UtamiMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Elfatia Ayu KinasihMuhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta1
Tareq Muhammad Aziz ElvenAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Powers and Limits of the State During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Critical Appraisal</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Satriawan, Iwan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Seviyana, Devi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">COVID-19</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Indonesia</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Limits</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Powers</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">State of Emergency.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The research aims to analyse the powers and limits of the State and whether Indonesia has properly adopted the concept of powers and limits during the state of emergency concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. The article adopted the normative legal research method, using the statute and case approaches for data analysis. The results show that a State may apply some types of power during an emergency. However, in using its powers, the government must consider the limits during a state of emergency. Indonesia has not properly adopted a balance of powers and limits during the state of emergency concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. While the government may take actions to respond to the pandemic, it cannot exceed the limitations on powers in accordance with the state of emergency principles. The State has tended to exceed the limits during the pandemic. In doing so, the State violated some state of emergency principles during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as temporariness, the rule of law, necessity, proportionally, intangibility, constitutionalism, harmony and supervision. The research recommends that in the future, the government and the House of Representatives (DPR) should obey the state of emergency principles, particularly in terms of State power limits to respect constitutional principles and the rule of law. In addition, individuals, groups of people or organisations may request judicial review of laws or regulations during a pandemic that violate the state of emergency principles to protect the fundamental rights of citizens.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-09-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/26600</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/ydk.v36i3.26600</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol. 36 No. 3 (2021): Volume 36 No 3 September 2021; 645-672</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-3103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-840X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/26600/15829</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Yuridika</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>