Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Harmonization of Personal Data Protection Principles With Electronic Justice Systems In Indonesia

Yuridika · Vol. 40 No. 3 (2025) · hlm. 343–368

DOI
10.20473/ydk.v40i3.74179
ISSN
2528-3103, 0215-840X
Terbit
2025-09-30
Penerbit
Universitas Airlangga
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Modern digital-based justice is the answer to the challenges of the development of the times. Although modern justice reflects an adaptive judicial body, it must still be equipped with established regulations. This study aims to examine the harmonization of personal data protection principles between the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 concerning electronic case administration and trials and Law No. 27/2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). In this case, the researcher uses a normative juridical method, with a statutory regulatory and comparative combined approach. This study highlights the norms gap in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022, particularly in the aspect of protecting the personal data of the parties input into the electronic justice administration system. The main findings exhibited are that the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 does not regulate the basic principles of data protection as mandated by the PDP Law, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and privacy right violations. The fact that the principle of personal data protection in the Supreme Court regulation has not been absorbed is due to the PDP Law, which only came into effect in 2024, even though both were enacted in the same year in 2022. This is seen as weakening the legitimacy of electronic justice in Indonesia. This study is expected to provide a positive contribution in the form of regulatory reform through the revision of the Supreme Court regulations, the establishment of data protection units in the judicial environment, and strengthening institutional coordination. The results of the comparative analysis of common law systems such as England show the importance of integrating data protection principles into the legal infrastructure and institutions of electronic justice to be aware of the protection of privacy rights that intersect with the guarantee of the human rights of justice seekers.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

23 penulis · 54 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Sukarmi SukarmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Elisabeth Septin PuspoayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Setyo WidagdoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rika KurniatyAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dhiana PuspitawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lukman Yudho PrakosoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nuddin HarahabAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurjannah NurjannahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Moh. FadliAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Rifqinizamy KarsayudaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah Dwi QurbaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Syaifudin ZuchriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pan Moh. FaizAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amelia Sri Kusuma DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Theta MurtyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Faizin SulistioAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tata WijayantaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Bambang SugiriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
YonatanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Harmonization of Personal Data Protection Principles With Electronic Justice Systems In Indonesia </dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mardyansyah, Dody Novizar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sukarmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Adi Kusumaningrum</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yenny Eta Widyanti</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Regulatory reform</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Electronic justice</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Personal data protection</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Perma 7/2022</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">PDP Law</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Modern digital-based justice is the answer to the challenges of the development of the times. Although modern justice reflects an adaptive judicial body, it must still be equipped with established regulations. This study aims to examine the harmonization of personal data protection principles between the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 concerning electronic case administration and trials and Law No. 27/2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (PDP Law). In this case, the researcher uses a normative juridical method, with a statutory regulatory and comparative combined approach. This study highlights the norms gap in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022, particularly in the aspect of protecting the personal data of the parties input into the electronic justice administration system. The main findings exhibited are that the Supreme Court Regulation No. 7/2022 does not regulate the basic principles of data protection as mandated by the PDP Law, which has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and privacy right violations. The fact that the principle of personal data protection in the Supreme Court regulation has not been absorbed is due to the PDP Law, which only came into effect in 2024, even though both were enacted in the same year in 2022. This is seen as weakening the legitimacy of electronic justice in Indonesia. This study is expected to provide a positive contribution in the form of regulatory reform through the revision of the Supreme Court regulations, the establishment of data protection units in the judicial environment, and strengthening institutional coordination. The results of the comparative analysis of common law systems such as England show the importance of integrating data protection principles into the legal infrastructure and institutions of electronic justice to be aware of the protection of privacy rights that intersect with the guarantee of the human rights of justice seekers.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/74179</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20473/ydk.v40i3.74179</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol. 40 No. 3 (2025): Volume 40 No 3 September 2025; 343-368</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-3103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>0215-840X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/74179/34375</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/74179/35056</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Dody Novizar Mardyansyah, Sukarmi, Yenny Eta Widyanti</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>