Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Geothermal Development Policy on Environmental in Indonesia and the USA

Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System · Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023) · hlm. 160–184

DOI
10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.85
ISSN
2807-2812, 2807-2979
Terbit
2023-05-08
Penerbit
Yayasan Pendidikan Contrarius Indonesia
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Geothermal utilization is generally used as clean green energy because of its contribution to gradually eliminating high carbon energy. However, in practice, geothermal damage to the environment, even regulation of its utilization does not guarantee environmental justice. This research study aims to determine environmentally just geothermal regulations to eliminate negative environmental impacts and public rejection of geothermal utilization. This study uses normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that geothermal potential can replace high-carbon energy even though it still has a damaging impact on the environment. Community rejection occurs in various areas where geothermal exploitation occurs in conservation forest areas. Geothermal energy regulation in Indonesia is no more pro-ecological than in the USA. Based on the analysis of the legal gap between the theory of ecological justice and the legal triangle and energy policy, it is found that the principles of geothermal regulation must prioritize ecology, not mere exploitation. The findings of this study are strengthening the principles of geothermal regulation based on ecological justice. Standardization of handling and monitoring of environmental impacts must be carried out in an integrated manner based on area category to avoid the widening of the ecological impact of geothermal utilization which results in rejection of the next project.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 93 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 55 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Universitas Slamet Riyadi
  • Andalas University
  • Diponegoro University
  • William & Mary
  • Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law Foundation
  • Thammasat University
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Lego KarjokoSebelas Maret University6
Lego KarjokoSebelas Maret University6
Fatma Ulfatun NajichaSebelas Maret University5
Muhammad Ainurrasyid Al FikriSebelas Maret University3
Ravi DanendraOñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law Foundation3
Hartiwiningsih HartiwiningsihSebelas Maret University3
Abdul Kadir JaelaniSebelas Maret University3
Rahayu SubektiSebelas Maret University2
Puji Wulandari KuncorowatiYogyakarta State University2
Henning GlaserThammasat University2
Saldi IsraAndalas University1
Ferdi FerdiAndalas University1
Albertus Sentot SudarwantoSebelas Maret University1
Arifin Ma’arufAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ninuk TriyantiSebelas Maret University1
Sultoni FikriUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya1
Agus RiwantoSebelas Maret University1
Imranullah AkhtarAlfalah University1
Jaco BarkhuizenUniversity of Limpopo1
Sulistyanta SulistyantaSebelas Maret University1
Fitria EsfandiariUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang1
Moh. FadliUniversity of Brawijaya1
Abdul WahidHasanuddin University1
Thesalonika Vega Puspa AgathaSebelas Maret University1
Ilham Aji PangestuSebelas Maret University1
Nuralievich RuzinazarovTashkent State University of Law1
Rian SaputraUniversitas Slamet Riyadi1
Pujiyono SuwadiSebelas Maret University1
Tiara TiolinceUniversitas Slamet Riyadi1
Giovan Bintang Graha PratamaUniversitas Slamet Riyadi1
Muhammad Jihadul HayatSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
Zainab Ompu JainahLampung University1
Fauzi IswariSebelas Maret University1
Adi SulistiyonoSebelas Maret University1
Chandra Puspita SariSebelas Maret University1
Kukuh Tejomurti TedjomurtiSebelas Maret University1
Seno Wibowo GumbiraIndonesia Open University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Geothermal Development Policy on Environmental in Indonesia and the USA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hanum, Willy Naresta</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Tegnan, Hilaire</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Geothermal utilization is generally used as clean green energy because of its contribution to gradually eliminating high carbon energy. However, in practice, geothermal damage to the environment, even regulation of its utilization does not guarantee environmental justice. This research study aims to determine environmentally just geothermal regulations to eliminate negative environmental impacts and public rejection of geothermal utilization. This study uses normative legal research. The results of this study indicate that geothermal potential can replace high-carbon energy even though it still has a damaging impact on the environment. Community rejection occurs in various areas where geothermal exploitation occurs in conservation forest areas. Geothermal energy regulation in Indonesia is no more pro-ecological than in the USA. Based on the analysis of the legal gap between the theory of ecological justice and the legal triangle and energy policy, it is found that the principles of geothermal regulation must prioritize ecology, not mere exploitation. The findings of this study are strengthening the principles of geothermal regulation based on ecological justice. Standardization of handling and monitoring of environmental impacts must be carried out in an integrated manner based on area category to avoid the widening of the ecological impact of geothermal utilization which results in rejection of the next project.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Yayasan Pendidikan Contrarius Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-05-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/85</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.53955/jhcls.v3i2.85</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System; 160-184</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-2812</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-2979</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.53955/jhcls.v3i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/85/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Willy Naresta Hanum, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani, Hilaire Tegnan</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>