Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Legislators Qualifications in Pakistan Under Islamic Constitutional Provisions

Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025) · hlm. 473–499

DOI
10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.491
ISSN
2807-2812, 2807-2979
Terbit
2025-08-13
Penerbit
Yayasan Pendidikan Contrarius Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Legislators’ qualifications play a vital role in preserving the integrity, legitimacy, and credibility of democratic governance. In Pakistan, the Constitution outlines specific requirements for candidates in Article 62, which are based on Islamic principles. However, the election laws do not provide clear procedural or definitional guidance for applying these provisions. This study examines the constitutional and Islamic foundations of legislators’ qualifications, interprets these provisions in light of Islamic teachings, and compares them with eligibility criteria in other democratic jurisdictions. The findings show that Pakistan’s electoral framework does not include explicit mechanisms to evaluate a candidate’s good character, Islamic knowledge, or moral conduct. Key terms such as good character, Islamic duties, and major sins remain undefined. This lack of clarity creates legal uncertainty, causes inconsistent enforcement, and raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and equal political rights. The absence of precise definitions also allows arbitrary or politically motivated interpretations, which weaken the rule of law. The comparison reveals that Egypt, Iran, Turkey, and Indonesia use more explicit legal or institutional mechanisms to determine candidate eligibility. The study concludes that lawmakers should clarify constitutional terms in election laws to strengthen legal certainty, ensure consistent application, and improve democratic governance.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

14 penulis · 35 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 11 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Tashkent State University of Law
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim
  • Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Tashkent State Agrarian University
  • Law Enforcement Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rayno Dwi AdityoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hajar Salamah Salsabila HarizJenderal Soedirman University1
Rayno Dwi AdityoUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Sheila Kusuma Wardani AmnestiUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Siti ZulaichahUniversitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim1
Bozarov Sardor SokhibjonovichAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Otabek NarzievAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Gulsanam TillayevaTashkent State Agrarian University1
Temurbek PulatovAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Burxanova Leyla MariusovnaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Umida SharaxmetovaTashkent State University of Law1
Abdullayeva Malikabonu Erkin KiziLaw Enforcement Academy of the Republic of Uzbekistan1
Akramov Akmaljon Anvarjon ugliTashkent State University of Law1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Legislators Qualifications in Pakistan Under Islamic Constitutional Provisions</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>AllahRakha, Naeem</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Constitution; Election; Islamic Principles; Legislation; Pakistan;</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Legislators’ qualifications play a vital role in preserving the integrity, legitimacy, and credibility of democratic governance. In Pakistan, the Constitution outlines specific requirements for candidates in Article 62, which are based on Islamic principles. However, the election laws do not provide clear procedural or definitional guidance for applying these provisions. This study examines the constitutional and Islamic foundations of legislators’ qualifications, interprets these provisions in light of Islamic teachings, and compares them with eligibility criteria in other democratic jurisdictions. The findings show that Pakistan’s electoral framework does not include explicit mechanisms to evaluate a candidate’s good character, Islamic knowledge, or moral conduct. Key terms such as good character, Islamic duties, and major sins remain undefined. This lack of clarity creates legal uncertainty, causes inconsistent enforcement, and raises concerns about fairness, transparency, and equal political rights. The absence of precise definitions also allows arbitrary or politically motivated interpretations, which weaken the rule of law. The comparison reveals that Egypt, Iran, Turkey, and Indonesia use more explicit legal or institutional mechanisms to determine candidate eligibility. The study concludes that lawmakers should clarify constitutional terms in election laws to strengthen legal certainty, ensure consistent application, and improve democratic governance.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Yayasan Pendidikan Contrarius Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-08-13</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/491</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.491</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System; 473-499</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-2812</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-2979</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.53955/jhcls.v5i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/491/117</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Naeem AllahRakha</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>