Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

Doctrinal and Comparative Assessment of GMO Liability Laws in the UAE

Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026) · hlm. 31–58

DOI
10.53955/jhcls.v6i1.701
ISSN
2807-2812, 2807-2979
Terbit
2026-01-30
Penerbit
Yayasan Pendidikan Contrarius Indonesia
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have become an integral part of modern biotechnology. However, their increasing use has sparked complex debates. The controversy pertains to balancing the benefits of biotechnological improvements against potential risks to biodiversity and public health. The current study aims to critically evaluate the legal texts related to accountability and civil liability for damages caused by GMOs. It seeks to assess the adequacy of UAE legislation in establishing effective mechanisms for liability and compensation for environmental and health impacts, thus answering the central question to what extent does the current UAE law enhance accountability compared to international standards. It employs a descriptive-analytical and comparative legal approach based on the analysis and critique of relevant international and UAE legal documents. The findings reveal that the UAE has established an advanced regulatory system aligned with international standards; however, significant legal gaps remain in definitional clarity, sanctions framework, liability rules, and enforcement provisions. The study concludes with a synthesis table and figure mapping points of convergence and difference between national and international instruments. The study recommends further development of the rules related to compensation and penalties to ensure appropriate legal deterrence for GMO-related harm and calls for legislative amendments that enhance the clarity of texts and their integration with international frameworks.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

13 penulis · 28 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 6 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Abu Dhabi University
  • United Arab Emirates University
  • Université de Bretagne Sud
  • Universitas Jambi
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yassine ChamiAbu Dhabi University1
Maya KhaterAbu Dhabi University1
Mohamed El Arbi AokaUniversité de Bretagne Sud1
Syamsir SyamsirUniversitas Jambi1
Eko NuriyatmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Firdaus ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sitta SarayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yassine ChamiAbu Dhabi University1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/oai, pertama di-harvest 10 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 10 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Doctrinal and Comparative Assessment of GMO Liability Laws in the UAE</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Imad, Dina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Khater, Maya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Abouhaiba, Nagwa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Qutieshat, Enas</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>AlMatrooshi, Ali</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">GMOs; Human Rights; International Law; Legal Liability; Sustainable Development; UAE Legislation;</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">



Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have become an integral part of modern biotechnology. However, their increasing use has sparked complex debates. The controversy pertains to balancing the benefits of biotechnological improvements against potential risks to biodiversity and public health.  The current study aims to critically evaluate the legal texts related to accountability and civil liability for damages caused by GMOs. It seeks to assess the adequacy of UAE legislation in establishing effective mechanisms for liability and compensation for environmental and health impacts, thus answering the central question to what extent does the current UAE law enhance accountability compared to international standards. It employs a descriptive-analytical and comparative legal approach based on the analysis and critique of relevant international and UAE legal documents. The findings reveal that the UAE has established an advanced regulatory system aligned with international standards; however, significant legal gaps remain in definitional clarity, sanctions framework, liability rules, and enforcement provisions. The study concludes with a synthesis table and figure mapping points of convergence and difference between national and international instruments. The study recommends further development of the rules related to compensation and penalties to ensure appropriate legal deterrence for GMO-related harm and calls for legislative amendments that enhance the clarity of texts and their integration with international frameworks.



</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Yayasan Pendidikan Contrarius Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-01-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/701</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.53955/jhcls.v6i1.701</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System; 31-58</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-2812</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2807-2979</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.53955/jhcls.v6i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://www.jhcls.org/index.php/JHCLS/article/view/701/141</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Dina Imad, Maya Khater, Nagwa Abouhaiba, Enas Qutieshat, Ali AlMatrooshi</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>