Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

ANALISA HUKUM TERHADAP KONSEKUENSI UPAYA HUKUM KASASI MENGENAI PUTUSAN BEBAS MURNI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA (Suatu Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1A Kendari)

Sultra Law Review · Vol. ume No. mor (2024) · pp. 3262–3274

ISSN
2685-208X
Published
2024-04-30
Publisher
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aims: 1) To find out and understand that an acquittal decision can be requested for legal action. 2) To find out and understand the consequences of a cassation legal action regarding an acquittal decision at the Kendari Class 1A District Court. This study is located at the Kendari Class 1A District Court, in this study, the author uses a qualitative data analysis system and then presents it descriptively. Qualitative data analysis is the analysis of data obtained through direct interviews with judges at the Kendari Class 1A District Court to obtain a more real picture which will then be presented descriptively regarding the implementation of cassation legal action on an acquittal decision in a criminal act. The results of this study indicate that: 1) That in the Indonesian legal system, court decisions are regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code which includes three types of decisions, namely a decision of acquittal from all legal charges, a decision of release from the demands of punishment, and a decision containing a criminal penalty. The judge is obliged to inform the defendant of his rights after the criminal decision, such as the right to accept or reject the decision, study the decision, and file a request for a suspension or appeal. Legal remedies are divided into two types, namely ordinary legal remedies (appeal and cassation) and extraordinary legal remedies (cassation in the interests of law and judicial review). Cassation can be filed by the defendant or public prosecutor against a decision that is already final, with the aim of correcting the application of the wrong law. While judicial review can only be filed on the basis of new evidence or a judge's error. 2) The consequences faced in the cassation legal remedy regarding an acquittal decision are that the defendant must be released from detention by law at that time, even though the cassation legal remedy is still being carried out by the public prosecutor.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 88 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
La Ode MuhramUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara11
Basoddin BasoddinUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara11
La NiasaUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara7
Sri KhayatiUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara6
Amir FaisalUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara5
Parulian NapitupuluUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara4
H.M. Ichlas MappilawaUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara3
Muhammad Azis TahirUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara3
Suriani Bt ToloUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara2
muhammad tahirUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara2
Aan Andryan SaputraUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara2
Nurhani NurhaniUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Ida RoyaniUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Wagino MallisaUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Ahmad RiyadiUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Faisal FaisalUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Abd. Azis AsparUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Dwi Puteri Yulianti HasanUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Lisnawati M.Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Zainuddin ZainuddinUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Yosef Jeffry RandongkirUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Wayan SupartaUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Irpan IrpanUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Jemiriah JemiriahUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Johanis TindukuUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
La AbudiUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
D. Rachmat Pratama SAffiliation unknown1
Arif ArifUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Kaharuddin KaharuddinUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Akbar Hasyib RachmanUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Fajar SapanUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
La Ode Muhammad Irman DjalaliUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
La Ode MustalibUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Lilik MustoyoUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Muh. Safri S.Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
Muhamad Aswal Lumo BallagiUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1
H.M. Abidin RamlinUniversitas Sulawesi Tenggara1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jurnal-unsultra.ac.id/index.php/sulrev/oai, first harvested 30 Okt 2026, last seen 30 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">ANALISA HUKUM TERHADAP KONSEKUENSI UPAYA HUKUM KASASI MENGENAI PUTUSAN BEBAS MURNI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA (Suatu Studi Di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas 1A Kendari)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sani, La Ode Hasrul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>.L, St. Fatmawati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Arifin, Djohar</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims: 1) To find out and understand that an acquittal decision can be requested for legal action. 2) To find out and understand the consequences of a cassation legal action regarding an acquittal decision at the Kendari Class 1A District Court. This study is located at the Kendari Class 1A District Court, in this study, the author uses a qualitative data analysis system and then presents it descriptively. Qualitative data analysis is the analysis of data obtained through direct interviews with judges at the Kendari Class 1A District Court to obtain a more real picture which will then be presented descriptively regarding the implementation of cassation legal action on an acquittal decision in a criminal act. The results of this study indicate that: 1) That in the Indonesian legal system, court decisions are regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code which includes three types of decisions, namely a decision of acquittal from all legal charges, a decision of release from the demands of punishment, and a decision containing a criminal penalty. The judge is obliged to inform the defendant of his rights after the criminal decision, such as the right to accept or reject the decision, study the decision, and file a request for a suspension or appeal. Legal remedies are divided into two types, namely ordinary legal remedies (appeal and cassation) and extraordinary legal remedies (cassation in the interests of law and judicial review). Cassation can be filed by the defendant or public prosecutor against a decision that is already final, with the aim of correcting the application of the wrong law. While judicial review can only be filed on the basis of new evidence or a judge's error. 2) The consequences faced in the cassation legal remedy regarding an acquittal decision are that the defendant must be released from detention by law at that time, even though the cassation legal remedy is still being carried out by the public prosecutor.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jurnal-unsultra.ac.id/index.php/sulrev/article/view/1149</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Sultra Law Review; Volume 06 Nomor 01, April 2024; 3262 - 3274</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2685-208X</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jurnal-unsultra.ac.id/index.php/sulrev/article/view/1149/801</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Sultra Law Review</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>