Jurnal
SINTA 2
Accuracy of Various Methods to Estimate Volume and Weight of Symmetrical and Non-Symmetrical Fruits using Computer Vision
Journal of ICT Research and Applications (JICTRA) · Vol. 16 No. 3 (2022) · pp. 210–225
ISSN 2338-5499, 2337-5787
Published 2022-12-27
Publisher DRI - ITB
Language eng
Abstract
Many researchers have used images to measure the volume and weight of fruits so that the measurement can be done remotely and non-contact. There are various methods for fruit volume estimation based on images, i.e., Basic Shape, Solid of Revolution, Conical Frustum, and Regression. The weight estimation generally uses Regression. This study analyzed the accuracy of these methods. Tests were done by taking images of symmetrical fruits (represented by tangerines) and non-symmetrical fruits (represented by strawberries). The images were processed using segmentation in saturation color space to get binary images. The Regression method used Diameter, Projection Area, and Perimeter as features that were extracted from the binary images. For symmetrical fruits, the best accuracy was obtained with the Linear Regression based on Diameter (LDD), which gave the highest R2 (0.96 for volume and 0.93 for weight) and the lowest RMSE (5.7 mm3 for volume and 5.3 gram for volume). For non-symmetrical fruits, the highest accuracy for non-symmetric fruits was given by the Linear Regression based on Diameter (LRD) and Linear Regression based on Area (LRA) with an R2 of 0.8 for volume and weight. The RMSE for LRD and LRA for strawberries was 3.3 mm3 for volume and 1.4 grams for weight.
Collaboration network of the authors
15 authors ·
42 co-authorship links
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jictra/oai,
first harvested 26 Okt 2026,
last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Accuracy of Various Methods to Estimate Volume and Weight of Symmetrical and Non-Symmetrical Fruits using Computer Vision</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Fitriyah, Hurriyatul</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">conical frustum</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">estimation</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">fruits</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">regression</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">solid of revolution</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Many researchers have used images to measure the volume and weight of fruits so that the measurement can be done remotely and non-contact. There are various methods for fruit volume estimation based on images, i.e., Basic Shape, Solid of Revolution, Conical Frustum, and Regression. The weight estimation generally uses Regression. This study analyzed the accuracy of these methods. Tests were done by taking images of symmetrical fruits (represented by tangerines) and non-symmetrical fruits (represented by strawberries). The images were processed using segmentation in saturation color space to get binary images. The Regression method used Diameter, Projection Area, and Perimeter as features that were extracted from the binary images. For symmetrical fruits, the best accuracy was obtained with the Linear Regression based on Diameter (LDD), which gave the highest R2 (0.96 for volume and 0.93 for weight) and the lowest RMSE (5.7 mm3 for volume and 5.3 gram for volume). For non-symmetrical fruits, the highest accuracy for non-symmetric fruits was given by the Linear Regression based on Diameter (LRD) and Linear Regression based on Area (LRA) with an R2 of 0.8 for volume and weight. The RMSE for LRD and LRA for strawberries was 3.3 mm3 for volume and 1.4 grams for weight.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">DRI - ITB</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2022-12-27</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jictra/article/view/18207</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2022.16.3.2</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of ICT Research and Applications; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2022); 210-225</dc:source>
<dc:source>2338-5499</dc:source>
<dc:source>2337-5787</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2022.16.3</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jictra/article/view/18207/6025</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of ICT Research and Applications</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Indexed
via DOI
4 citations
Crossref
Indexed
via DOI
5 citations
Counts as reported by each index on 26 Okt 2026; indexes count citations differently.
OpenAlex also lists this work in: crossref, doaj.
Cite this article
APA 7
Fitriyah, H. (2022). Accuracy of Various Methods to Estimate Volume and Weight of Symmetrical and Non-Symmetrical Fruits using Computer Vision. Journal of ICT Research and Applications (JICTRA), 16(3), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2022.16.3.2
Copy
IEEE
H. Fitriyah, “Accuracy of Various Methods to Estimate Volume and Weight of Symmetrical and Non-Symmetrical Fruits using Computer Vision,” Journal of ICT Research and Applications (JICTRA), vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 210–225, 2022, doi: 10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2022.16.3.2.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.