Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Foundations of Domain-specific Large Language Models for Islamic Studies: A Comprehensive Review

Journal of ICT Research and Applications (JICTRA) · Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025) · pp. 69–85

DOI
10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2025.19.1.4
ISSN
2338-5499, 2337-5787
Published
2025-11-03
Publisher
DRI - ITB
Language
eng

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have undergone rapid evolution and are highly effective in tasks such as text generation, question answering, and context-driven analysis. However, the unique requirements of Islamic studies, where textual authenticity, diverse jurisprudential interpretations, and deep semantic nuances are critical, present challenges for general LLMs. This article reviews the evolution of neural language models by comparing the historical progression of general LLMs with emerging Islamic-specific LLMs. We discuss the technical foundations of modern Transformer architectures and examine how recent advancements, such as GPT-4, DeepSeek, and Mistral, have expanded LLM capabilities. The paper also highlights the limitations of standard evaluation metrics like perplexity and BLEU in capturing doctrinal, ethical, and interpretative accuracy. To address these gaps, we propose specialized evaluation metrics to assess doctrinal correctness, internal consistency, and overall reliability. Finally, we outline a research roadmap aimed at developing robust, ethically aligned, and jurisprudentially precise Islamic LLMs.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

4 authors · 6 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Jubail Industrial College
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jictra/oai, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Foundations of Domain-specific Large Language Models for Islamic Studies: A Comprehensive Review</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>El Amrani, Mohamed Yassine</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Vakayil, Arshad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mohammed, Feroz</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Al Amri, Faisal</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">bias mitigation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">ethical AI</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">fiqh</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Islamic studies</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">large language models</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">natural language processing</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">transformer architecture</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Large language models (LLMs) have undergone rapid evolution and are highly effective in tasks such as text generation, question answering, and context-driven analysis. However, the unique requirements of Islamic studies, where textual authenticity, diverse jurisprudential interpretations, and deep semantic nuances are critical, present challenges for general LLMs. This article reviews the evolution of neural language models by comparing the historical progression of general LLMs with emerging Islamic-specific LLMs. We discuss the technical foundations of modern Transformer architectures and examine how recent advancements, such as GPT-4, DeepSeek, and Mistral, have expanded LLM capabilities. The paper also highlights the limitations of standard evaluation metrics like perplexity and BLEU in capturing doctrinal, ethical, and interpretative accuracy. To address these gaps, we propose specialized evaluation metrics to assess doctrinal correctness, internal consistency, and overall reliability. Finally, we outline a research roadmap aimed at developing robust, ethically aligned, and jurisprudentially precise Islamic LLMs.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">DRI - ITB</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-11-03</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jictra/article/view/25405</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2025.19.1.4</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of ICT Research and Applications; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2025); 69-85</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2338-5499</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2337-5787</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.5614/itbj.ict.res.appl.2025.19.1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jictra/article/view/25405/7178</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of ICT Research and Applications</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>