Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effect Of Contextual Teaching And Learning On Students’ Reading Comprehension

Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET) · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2017)

DOI
10.33772/jleet.v2i1.6700
ISSN
2502-3306
Published
2017-01-05
Publisher
Halu Oleo University
Language
eng

Abstract

This paper presents a research to examine whether or there is any significant difference of reading comprehension between low and high vocabulary a chievers taught using CTL approach and those taught using traditional approach, and To describe the students’ perception toward the use of contextual teaching and learning approach.. The participants consisted of 62 students with high and low vocabulary kowleadge. The participants were divided into an experimental group (n = 33) and a control group (n = 29). The the research employed a mixed method (quantititative and qualitative). Standardized reading test and inferential statistical analysis were employed to measure the difference of reading comprehension between students using CTL approac and traditional approach. Then semi structured inteview and intra case analysis were performed to describe students perception toward the use of CTL approach. Results showed that: (1) there is no sigrnificant difference of reading comprehension between low achievers taught using CTL approach and those taught using traditional approach; (2) there is a significant differnce of reading comprehension between high achievers taughtt using CTL approach and those taught using traditional approach; (3) in general, the use of CTL approach in teaching reading was perceived positively by students. The impacts of using this approach were noticeable on the emergence of students’ fun and motivation to learn reading. However the use of this approach was not affective enough to improve the reading comprehension of students with limited vocabularies.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 102 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Amri TanduklangiUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Zalili SailanAffiliation unknown4
Hilaluddin HanafiAffiliation unknown3
Sartiah YusranAffiliation unknown3
Aris BadaraUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Muhammad YazidInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember3
La Ode NggawuUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Hanna HannaUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Tambunan TambunanAffiliation unknown2
Herlindayana HerlindayanaAffiliation unknown2
Fitria Cahya SariUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Samsuddin SamsuddinAffiliation unknown1
Nur Evi HamiruAffiliation unknown1
Asri Nova RamaAffiliation unknown1
Amiruddin RahimAffiliation unknown1
Suharmin SuharminAffiliation unknown1
Nurnia NurniaAffiliation unknown1
Ni Kadek SeprianiAffiliation unknown1
Asyarifullah RamliAffiliation unknown1
Suhartono SuhartonoInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Kamaluddin KamaluddinUniversitas Merdeka Malang1
La KookoAffiliation unknown1
Andi SessuAffiliation unknown1
Ader LaepeAffiliation unknown1
Kasmawati KasmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Haderaerani HaderaeraniAffiliation unknown1
La InoUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Elsa Silvia NasrulAffiliation unknown1
Suhartono TonoAffiliation unknown1
Endriyatin EndriyatinAffiliation unknown1
Asruni AsruniAffiliation unknown1
Anita RezkiInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Carlina AmriAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad KurniawanAffiliation unknown1
Riskawati RiskawatiAffiliation unknown1
Mursalim MursalimAffiliation unknown1
Nurfitriani ArifinAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JLEET/oai, first harvested 30 Okt 2026, last seen 30 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effect Of Contextual Teaching And Learning On Students’ Reading Comprehension</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Azan, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sahlan, Sahlan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Alberth, Alberth</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This paper presents a research to examine whether or there is any significant difference of reading comprehension between low and high vocabulary a chievers taught using CTL approach and those taught using traditional approach, and To describe  the students’ perception toward the use of contextual teaching and learning approach. . The participants consisted of 62 students with high and low vocabulary kowleadge  . The participants were divided into an experimental group (n = 33) and a control group (n = 29). The the research employed a mixed method (quantititative and qualitative). Standardized reading test and inferential statistical analysis were employed to measure the difference of reading comprehension between students using CTL approac and traditional approach. Then semi structured inteview and intra case analysis were performed to describe students perception toward the use of CTL approach. Results showed that : (1) there is no sigrnificant difference of reading comprehension between low achievers taught using CTL approach and those taught using traditional approach; (2) there is a significant differnce of reading comprehension between high achievers taughtt using CTL approach and those taught using traditional approach; (3) in general, the use of CTL approach in teaching reading was perceived positively by students. The impacts of using this approach were noticeable on the emergence of students’ fun and motivation to learn reading. However the use of this approach was not affective enough to improve the reading comprehension of students with limited vocabularies.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Halu Oleo University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2017-01-05</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JLEET/article/view/6700</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33772/jleet.v2i1.6700</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET); Vol 2, No 1 (2017): Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-3306</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.33772/jleet.v2i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JLEET/article/view/6700/4932</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Language Education and Educational Technology (JLEET)</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>