Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Percentage of giblets of Several Types of Ducks in Semi-Intensive Maintenance

Indonesian Journal Of Animal Agricultural Science (IJAAS) · Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022)

DOI
10.33772/ijaas.v3i3.24968
ISSN
2715-1697
Published
2022-04-18
Publisher
Pascasarjana Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara
Language
eng

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the carcass composition of several different types of ducks in a semi-intensive maintenance system. There were 16 ducks used with 3 months of age based on a complete randomized design (CRD) with 4 different duck treatments and 4 replications. Based on the results and discussion, it can be concluded that at the same age, Peking duck, alabio duck, manila duck and mojosari duck were significantly different (P 0.01) in cutting weight, carcass percentage, thigh percentage, back percentage, gizzard percentage and fat percentage abdominal. Meanwhile, the different types of ducks did not affect (P 0.05) chest percentage, wing percentage, neck percentage and heart percentage. In general, live weight, percentage of carcasses and parts of carcasses of manila ducks were superior to mojosari ducks, alabio ducks and Peking ducks. The alabio duck is superior to the Peking duck and the mojosari duck. In terms of non-carcass organs, mojosari ducks had a percentage of gizzard superior to Peking, alabio and manila ducks, while the percentage of liver was significantly different (P 0.05) and the percentage of heart was not significantly different (P 0.05). The abdominal fat content of alabio duck is very different from that of Peking duck, mojsari duck and manila duck.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 214 co-authorship links · 19 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Gunadarma University
  • IPB University
  • State University of Makassar
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Fitrianingsih FitrianingsihGunadarma University13
Amiluddin IndiUniversitas Halu Oleo10
La Ode NafiuUniversitas Halu Oleo8
Hamdan HasUniversitas Halu Oleo7
Muhammad Amrullah PagalaUniversitas Halu Oleo6
Andi Murlina TasseUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Deki ZulkarnainUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Natsir SandiahUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Achmad Selamet AkuUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Asma Bio KimestriUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Rahim AkaUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Nuraini NurainiAffiliation unknown3
Takdir SailiUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Nur Santy AsminayaUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Widhi KurniawanUniversitas Halu Oleo3
La MalesiUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Fanny Yulia IrawanUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Firman NasiuUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Nita NitaAffiliation unknown2
La Ode Arsad SaniUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Musram AbadiUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Anita Mustika IbrahimAffiliation unknown2
Ahmad Bayu AriawanAffiliation unknown2
Rusli BadaruddinUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Takdir SailiAffiliation unknown2
Ali BainUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Lija Numriah NullahUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Rudy PriyantoIPB University1
Resa PahleviUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Hasmiarni ArisUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Yana WatiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
. RahmanUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Dian AgustinaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Indrayani IndrayaniState University of Makassar1
Astri YusufUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Hasiruddin HasiruddinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Febi FebrianingsihUniversitas Halu Oleo1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/IJAAS/oai, first harvested 30 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Percentage of giblets of Several Types of Ducks in Semi-Intensive Maintenance</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hafid, Harapin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Muntia, La Ode</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Napirah, Astriana</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Percentage of carcass, Peking duck, alabio duck, Manila duck, mojosari duck.</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to determine the carcass composition of several different types of ducks in a semi-intensive maintenance system. There were 16 ducks used with 3 months of age based on a complete randomized design (CRD) with 4 different duck treatments and 4 replications. Based on the results and discussion, it can be concluded that at the same age, Peking duck, alabio duck, manila duck and mojosari duck were significantly different (P 0.01) in cutting weight, carcass percentage, thigh percentage, back percentage, gizzard percentage and fat percentage abdominal. Meanwhile, the different types of ducks did not affect (P 0.05) chest percentage, wing percentage, neck percentage and heart percentage. In general, live weight, percentage of carcasses and parts of carcasses of manila ducks were superior to mojosari ducks, alabio ducks and Peking ducks. The alabio duck is superior to the Peking duck and the mojosari duck. In terms of non-carcass organs, mojosari ducks had a percentage of gizzard superior to Peking, alabio and manila ducks, while the percentage of liver was significantly different (P 0.05) and the percentage of heart was not significantly different (P 0.05). The abdominal fat content of alabio duck is very different from that of Peking duck, mojsari duck and manila duck.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Pascasarjana Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2022-04-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/24968</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.33772/ijaas.v3i3.24968</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Indonesian Journal Of Animal Agricultural Science (IJAAS); Vol 3, No 3 (2021): Indonesian Journal Of Animal Agricultural Science (IJAAS)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-1697</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/IJAAS/article/view/24968/14828</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>10.33772/ijaas.v3i3.24968.g14828</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Indonesian Journal Of Animal Agricultural Science (IJAAS)</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>