Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS ON E-LEARNING UNIVERSITY XYZ WITH NAÏVE BAYES CLASSIFIER METHOD

JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi · Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023) · pp. 81–97

DOI
10.12962/j24068535.v21i2.a1147
ISSN
2406-8535, 1412-6389
Published
2023-07-31
Publisher
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Language
eng

Abstract

The covid-19 pandemic forced students and lecturers to carry out teaching and learning from home. Therefore, XYZ University focuses its students on using e-learning. E-learning that has been running and used by students must be evaluated, so that teaching and learning activities can run well. Evaluation can be done by collecting opinions based on the features of XYZ University E-learning on students through questionnaires. All opinions can be analyzed using classification method called Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine for comparison. The research started by collecting data, preprocessing data, labeling using polarity, calculating the frequency that often from each e-learning feature, and calculating the accuracy of the Complement Naïve Bayes model and Support Vector Machine model. The research results conducted on 1995 dataset testing, in student opinions with 1289 positive values, 372 negative values, and 364 neutral values. Reinforced by the comparison result of Complement Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine. When Complement Naïve Bayes model accuracy of 89%, recall 85,3%, and the f1-score 85%. While Support Vector Machine accuracy is lower 11,1% than Complement Naïve Bayes Model with only 74,4%. These results indicate that of the 12 features on XYZ University E-learning, 8 features have a good opinion, 2 features have a bad opinion, and 2 feature have a neutral opinion.

Collaboration network of the authors

2 authors · 1 co-authorship link

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sriwijaya University
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://juti.if.its.ac.id/index.php/juti/oai, first harvested 26 Okt 2026, last seen 26 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">SENTIMENT ANALYSIS ON E-LEARNING UNIVERSITY XYZ WITH NAÏVE BAYES CLASSIFIER METHOD</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fernando, Jose</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fathoni, Fathoni</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The covid-19 pandemic forced students and lecturers to carry out teaching and learning from home. Therefore, XYZ    University focuses its students on using e-learning. E-learning that has been running and used by students must be evaluated, so that teaching and learning activities can run well. Evaluation can be done by collecting opinions based on the features of XYZ University E-learning on students through questionnaires. All opinions can be analyzed using classification method called Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine for comparison.  The research started by collecting data, preprocessing data, labeling using polarity, calculating the frequency that often from each e-learning feature, and calculating the accuracy of the Complement Naïve Bayes model and Support Vector Machine model. The research results conducted on 1995 dataset testing, in student opinions with 1289 positive values, 372 negative values, and 364 neutral values. Reinforced by the comparison result of Complement Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine. When Complement Naïve Bayes model accuracy of 89%, recall 85,3%, and the f1-score 85%. While Support Vector Machine accuracy is lower 11,1% than Complement Naïve Bayes Model with only 74,4%. These results indicate that of the 12 features on XYZ University E-learning, 8 features have a good opinion, 2 features have a bad opinion, and 2 feature have a neutral opinion.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-07-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/zip</dc:format>
	<dc:format>application/zip</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://juti.if.its.ac.id/index.php/juti/article/view/1147</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.12962/j24068535.v21i2.a1147</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi; Vol. 21, No. 2, July 2023; 81-97</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2406-8535</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1412-6389</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.12962/j24068535.v21i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://juti.if.its.ac.id/index.php/juti/article/view/1147/495</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://juti.if.its.ac.id/index.php/juti/article/view/1147/536</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://juti.if.its.ac.id/index.php/juti/article/view/1147/537</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://juti.if.its.ac.id/index.php/juti/article/view/1147/538</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://juti.if.its.ac.id/index.php/juti/article/view/1147/539</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>