Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

THE EFFECT OF PROBING PROMPTING ON STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AT TENTH GRADE OF MAN 1 BOMBANA

Journal of Teaching of English · Vol. 5 No. 2 (2020) · pp. 140–148

ISSN
2548-6810
Published
2020-08-19
Publisher
Universitas Halu Oleo
Language
eng

Abstract

The objective of this research was to find out the effect of using probing prompting on students’ writing achievement at tenth grade of MAN 1 Bombana. This research applied quasi experimental design that consist of experimental class and control class. The sample of this research were students at class X IPA and X IPS in MAN 1 Bombana who were register in academic years 2019/2020. The sample taken by using cluster random sampling and the total numbers of students are 46, 22 for experimental class (X IPA) and 24 for control class (X IPS). The research instrument was written test which focus on narrative text. The researcher collected the data by giving pre-test in both of the classes, giving treatment in experimental by giving probing prompting and non-probing prompting in control class, and giving post-test in both of the classes. In analyzing the data were used SPSS 16.0 version. To examine the hypothesis the researcher used an independent sample t-test. Based on the result, it showed that students’ mean score of post-test in experimental class is 64.35. It is raised 9.83 point from its pre-test (54.52). While students’ mean score of post-test in control class is 56.82. It is only raised 4.97 point from its pre-test (51.85). Besides, the value of degree of freedom (df)= 42, t=4.574, and sig (2 tailed)=0.000. It means that the probability (sig) value is lower than α ( p value α or 0.000 0.05). Therefore,probingprompting had a significant effect on students’ writing achievement at tenth grade of MAN 1 Bombana.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 89 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare
  • Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nurnia NurniaAffiliation unknown3
Amri TanduklangiUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Amirudin RahimAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad JabirUniversitas Muhammadiyah Parepare2
Aris BadaraUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Lisa IndrajayaAffiliation unknown1
Deddy AmrandAffiliation unknown1
La Ode Muhammad Nur RahimAffiliation unknown1
Sarwo Zulfahmi MDAffiliation unknown1
Sahlan SahlanAffiliation unknown1
Nurfitriani ArifinAffiliation unknown1
Zalili SailanAffiliation unknown1
Annisa RezkiAffiliation unknown1
Baso SulhamAffiliation unknown1
Rusnayanti RusnayantiAffiliation unknown1
Nurindah NurindahUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Wisdar AristaAffiliation unknown1
Firdaus SaleUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Darlin DarlinAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Khusnun MuhsinAffiliation unknown1
Rini Darianti HartinaAffiliation unknown1
La Ode NggawuUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Salfiani SalfianiAffiliation unknown1
Amir JayaAffiliation unknown1
Nurhikmah Dwi AstutiAffiliation unknown1
Eva VeronicaAffiliation unknown1
Kamaluddin KamaluddinUniversitas Merdeka Malang1
Ahmad MusadiqAffiliation unknown1
Siam SiamUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Endang Tri Novianty SamirinAffiliation unknown1
Sitti SuharniAffiliation unknown1
Muh. Khusnun MuhsinUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Chici Faradillah HasanahAffiliation unknown1
Amrin AmrinAffiliation unknown1
Lelly SuhartiniUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Ria Ulfa Handayani MuhuAffiliation unknown1
Sisca Tiara HananditaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/oai, first harvested 31 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE EFFECT OF PROBING PROMPTING ON STUDENTS’ WRITING ACHIEVEMENT AT TENTH GRADE OF MAN 1 BOMBANA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hasnia, Hasnia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mursalim, Mursalim</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Agustina, Sitti</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The objective of this research was to find out the effect of using probing prompting on students’ writing achievement at tenth grade of MAN 1 Bombana. This research applied quasi experimental design that consist of experimental class and control class. The sample of this research were students at class X IPA and X IPS in MAN 1 Bombana who were register in academic years 2019/2020. The sample taken by using cluster random sampling and the total numbers of students are 46, 22 for experimental class (X IPA) and 24 for control class (X IPS). The research instrument was written test which focus on narrative text. The researcher collected the data by giving pre-test in both of the classes, giving treatment in experimental by giving probing prompting and non-probing prompting in control class, and giving post-test in both of the classes. In analyzing the data were used SPSS 16.0 version. To examine the hypothesis the researcher used an independent sample t-test. Based on the result, it showed that students’ mean score of post-test in experimental class is 64.35. It is raised 9.83 point from its pre-test (54.52). While students’ mean score of post-test in control class is 56.82. It is only raised 4.97 point from its pre-test (51.85). Besides, the value of degree of freedom (df)= 42, t=4.574, and sig (2 tailed)=0.000. It means that the probability (sig) value is lower than α ( p value  α or 0.000  0.05). Therefore,probingprompting  had a significant effect on students’ writing achievement at tenth grade of MAN 1 Bombana.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Halu Oleo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2020-08-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/13608</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Teaching of English; Vol 5, No 2 (2020): Journal of Teaching of English; 140 - 148</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2548-6810</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/13608/9519</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Teaching English</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>