Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Klustering Dengan K-Means Berbasis LVQ Dan K-Means Berbasis OWA

Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK) · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015) · pp. 29–33

DOI
10.25126/jtiik.201521125
ISSN
2528-6579, 2355-7699
Published
2015-12-20
Publisher
Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
Language
en

Abstract

Abstrak Pada penelitian ini dilakukan pembandingan hasil klustering pada data car evaluation dengan menggunakan K-Means berbasis LVQ (Learning Vector Quantization) dan K-Means berbasis OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging). Pada kedua metode ini sama-sama mempergunakan K-Means tetapi yang sudah mengalami modifikasi. Hasil dari penelitian sebelumnya secara terpisah yang membandingkan metode K-Means modifikasi tersebut dengan K-Means konvensional menunjukkan bahwa kedua metode modifikasi tersebut sama-sama lebih baik daripada K-Means konvensional. Tetapi belum pernah ada penelitian yang membandingkan akurasi hasil klustering kedua metode modifikasi tersebut. Sehingga pada penelitian ini dilakukan klustering dengan menggunakan kedua metode tersebut untuk data car evaluation, karena dari penelitian sebelumnya kedua metode tersebut cukup handal dalam melakukan klustering. Hasil dari ujicoba menunjukkan rata-rata hasil akurasi dimulai yang tertinggi adalah K-Means berbasis LVQ(86.50%), K-Means berbasis OWA(86,16%) kemudian K-Means konvensional (56,50%). Tetapi dengan urutan atribut yang benar dan pemilihan nilai alpha yang tepat yakni 0.8, K-Means berbasis OWA bisa menghasilkan akurasi yang lebih tinggi yakni 93.33%. Kata kunci: K-Means berbasis LVQ, K-Means, K-Means berbasis OWA, bobot Abstract In this paper do a comparison with the results of klustering using K-Means based LVQ (Learning Vector Quantization) and K-Means based OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging). In both of these methods used K-Means but which has been modified. Results from previous studies have shown that both methods are better than conventional K-Means. But there has never been a study comparing the accuracy of klustering results of the two methods. So in this study conducted klustering using both methods for data car evaluation, because of previous studies both methods are reliable enough to perform klustering In the researchs before it, both method are prefer than conventionalK-Means, but there are no researchs which compare them. So, in the research, we will compare it by using same data that is car evaluation. In order to know what it is method is the best. The result of research are that in the average, K-Means LVQ(86.50%) is more accuracy than K-Means – OWA(86,16%) and conventional K-Means(56,50). But if the order of selection attributes and alpha values is correct ​​, K Means based OWA can generate higher accuracy that is 93.33 % using the alpha value of 0.8 Keywords: K-Means based LVQ, K-Means, K-Means based OWA, weight

Collaboration network of the authors

30 authors · 46 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nanang Yudi SetiawanUniversity of Brawijaya2
Putri Nur FadilaUniversity of Brawijaya2
Marji .University of Brawijaya1
Lailil MuflikhahUniversity of Brawijaya1
Achmad RidokUniversity of Brawijaya1
Zikfikri Yulfiandi RachmadUniversity of Brawijaya1
Achmad ArwanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mahendra DataUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ibnu AqliUniversity of Brawijaya1
Suherni PrahestiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Heru NurwasitoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Sutrisno SutrisnoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Rozaq AkbarUniversity of Brawijaya1
Alland Rifqy PutraAffiliation unknown1
Alland Rifqy PutraUniversity of Brawijaya1
Muhammad Fariz FirdausUniversity of Brawijaya1
Dinar Fairus SalsabillahUniversity of Brawijaya1
Rizal Setya PerdanaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Anshar ZulhilmiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Bayu RahayudiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Tsania DzulkarnainUniversity of Brawijaya1
Satrio Hadi WijoyoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Eka Bayu SatriawanAffiliation unknown1
Eka Bayu SatriawanAffiliation unknown1
Raihan WinurputraAffiliation unknown1
Raihan WinurputraUniversity of Brawijaya1
Muh. Arif RahmanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Matyus Garbela IsmantoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/en/oai, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Klustering Dengan K-Means Berbasis LVQ Dan K-Means Berbasis OWA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ratnawati, Dian Eka</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">., Indriati</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Abstrak Pada penelitian ini dilakukan pembandingan hasil klustering pada data car evaluation dengan menggunakan K-Means berbasis LVQ (Learning Vector Quantization) dan K-Means berbasis OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging). Pada kedua metode ini sama-sama mempergunakan K-Means tetapi yang sudah mengalami modifikasi. Hasil dari penelitian sebelumnya secara terpisah yang membandingkan metode K-Means modifikasi tersebut dengan K-Means konvensional menunjukkan bahwa kedua metode modifikasi tersebut sama-sama lebih baik daripada K-Means konvensional. Tetapi belum pernah ada penelitian yang membandingkan akurasi hasil klustering kedua metode modifikasi tersebut. Sehingga pada penelitian ini dilakukan klustering dengan menggunakan kedua metode tersebut untuk data car evaluation, karena dari penelitian sebelumnya kedua metode tersebut cukup handal dalam melakukan klustering.  Hasil dari ujicoba menunjukkan rata-rata hasil akurasi dimulai yang tertinggi adalah K-Means berbasis LVQ(86.50%), K-Means berbasis OWA(86,16%) kemudian K-Means konvensional (56,50%). Tetapi dengan urutan atribut yang benar dan pemilihan nilai alpha yang tepat yakni 0.8, K-Means berbasis OWA bisa menghasilkan akurasi yang lebih tinggi yakni 93.33%.   Kata kunci: K-Means berbasis LVQ, K-Means, K-Means berbasis OWA, bobot Abstract In this paper do a comparison with the results of klustering using K-Means based LVQ (Learning Vector Quantization) and K-Means based OWA (Ordered Weighted Averaging). In both of these methods used K-Means but which has been modified.  Results from previous studies have shown that both methods are better than conventional K-Means. But there has never been a study comparing the accuracy of klustering results of the two methods. So in this study conducted klustering using both methods for data car evaluation, because of previous studies both methods are reliable enough to perform klustering In the researchs before it, both method are prefer than conventionalK-Means, but there are no researchs which compare them. So, in the research , we will compare it by using same data that is  car evaluation. In order to know what it is method is the best. The result of research are that in the average , K-Means LVQ(86.50%) is more accuracy than K-Means – OWA(86,16%) and conventional K-Means(56,50). But if the order of selection attributes and alpha values is correct ​​, K Means based OWA can generate higher accuracy that is 93.33 % using the alpha value of 0.8 Keywords: K-Means based LVQ, K-Means, K-Means based OWA, weight</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2015-12-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/125</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.25126/jtiik.201521125</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol 2 No 1: April 2015; 29-33</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol. 2 No. 1: April 2015; 29-33</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2355-7699</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.25126/jtiik.201521</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/125/pdf</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>