Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Analisis Miskonsepsi terhadap Materi Rangkaian Listrik Searah (DC) Pada Siswa SMK Negeri Kota Kendari Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test

Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika · Vol. 5 No. 4 (2020) · pp. 287–294

DOI
10.36709/jipfi.v5i4.14097
ISSN
2715-551X, 2502-3861
Published
2020-09-17
Publisher
Universitas Halu Oleo
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the misconceptions of unidirectional electric circuit material in elementary school students of the city of Kendari using a four-tier test. Sampling uses a purposive sampling technique with the consideration of taking schools that have the same vocational training so that they get 4 classes from the Department of Computer and Network Engineering totaling 110 people. The population of this research is all students of SMK Negeri Kendari City. Data collection was carried out by providing a test instrument in the form of four-tier diagnostic test questions totaling 15 numbers, which were adopted from the 2018 Tami Beniarti questions and interviews. Data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis to obtain a percentage of concept understanding, misconception, partial understanding, not understanding the concept and cannot be coded to students so that conclusions are obtained: (1) the average percentage of concept understanding is 12.8%, misconceptions are 24.1 %, do not understand the concept of 23.4%, understand partially by 37.5%, and cannot be coded as much as 2.2%, (2) Students' misconceptions of each sub-concept are successively electric current and potential difference (34), 24%), electrical resistance and circuit resistance (23.94%), simple circuit analysis (17.88%), Ohm's law (21.82%), and Kirchoff's law (22.73%), (3) percentage of misconceptions among students in each vocational high school namely at SMKN 1 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions was 18.0%, for SMKN 3 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions was 19.7%, for SMKN 4 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions was 29.9%, whereas for SMKN 5 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions of 29.3%. Overall the percentage obtained for each school is of low category.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 95 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Muhammad AnasAffiliation unknown9
La SaharaAffiliation unknown5
Tahir TahirAffiliation unknown4
Amiruddin TakdaUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Arman ArmanUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Luh SukariasihUniversitas Halu Oleo3
La Ode SafiuddinAffiliation unknown2
Muh. YurisAffiliation unknown2
Rezhi EffendiAffiliation unknown1
Alwin AlwinAffiliation unknown1
Laode SafiuddinAffiliation unknown1
Saras SarasAffiliation unknown1
Putri OktavianAffiliation unknown1
Fitriani FitrianiAffiliation unknown1
Kiky Nurwuna AzurahAffiliation unknown1
Muh AnasAffiliation unknown1
Naim NaimAffiliation unknown1
Ilfa DiasmaniarAffiliation unknown1
Martiana MartianaAffiliation unknown1
Nur Hasiyatin HamunduAffiliation unknown1
La Ode RusmanAffiliation unknown1
Yoo Eka Yana KansilUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Sitti KasmiatiAffiliation unknown1
HUSEIN HUSEINUniversitas Halu Oleo1
La Ode SaifuddinAffiliation unknown1
Mardiana NAffiliation unknown1
Ferlyasari FerlyasariAffiliation unknown1
Sri Pina AriyantiAffiliation unknown1
Miftah KhairaniAffiliation unknown1
Ilma ZhahirAffiliation unknown1
Yeni Sariani HasanAffiliation unknown1
La TahangAffiliation unknown1
Asra AsraAffiliation unknown1
Wulan SuciAffiliation unknown1
La Maronta GalibAffiliation unknown1
Zarianti ZariantiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JIPFI/oai, first harvested 31 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Analisis Miskonsepsi terhadap Materi Rangkaian Listrik Searah (DC) Pada Siswa SMK Negeri Kota Kendari Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Trisnawati, Agus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Erniwati, Erniwati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Eso, Rosliana</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mustari, Mustari</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Misconception; Four-Tier Test; Unidirectional Electric Circuit</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to analyze the misconceptions of unidirectional electric circuit material in elementary school students of the city of Kendari using a four-tier test. Sampling uses a purposive sampling technique with the consideration of taking schools that have the same vocational training so that they get 4 classes from the Department of Computer and Network Engineering totaling 110 people. The population of this research is all students of SMK Negeri Kendari City. Data collection was carried out by providing a test instrument in the form of four-tier diagnostic test questions totaling 15 numbers, which were adopted from the 2018 Tami Beniarti questions and interviews. Data were analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis to obtain a percentage of concept understanding, misconception, partial understanding, not understanding the concept and cannot be coded to students so that conclusions are obtained: (1) the average percentage of concept understanding is 12.8%, misconceptions are 24.1 %, do not understand the concept of 23.4%, understand partially by 37.5%, and cannot be coded as much as 2.2%, (2) Students' misconceptions of each sub-concept are successively electric current and potential difference (34) , 24%), electrical resistance and circuit resistance (23.94%), simple circuit analysis (17.88%), Ohm's law (21.82%), and Kirchoff's law (22.73%), (3) percentage of misconceptions among students in each vocational high school namely at SMKN 1 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions was 18.0%, for SMKN 3 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions was 19.7%, for SMKN 4 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions was 29.9%, whereas for SMKN 5 Kendari the percentage of misconceptions of 29.3%. Overall the percentage obtained for each school is of low category.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Halu Oleo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Halu Oleo</dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2020-09-17</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JIPFI/article/view/14097</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.36709/jipfi.v5i4.14097</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika; Vol 5, No 4 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika; 287-294</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-551X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-3861</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JIPFI/article/view/14097/9827</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JIPFI/article/downloadSuppFile/14097/1885</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Fisika</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>