ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BIAYA KONSTRUKSI PERKERASAN KAKU (RIGID PAVEMENT) DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) (Studi Kasus: Jalan Prof. M. Yamin, Kelurahan Puuwatu, Kota Kendari)

Lelepadang, Shania; Nuhun, Ridwansyah; Nasrul, Nasrul; Ahmad, Siti Nurjanah

doi:10.55679/jts.v8i3.16192

Open access Jurnal

ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BIAYA KONSTRUKSI PERKERASAN KAKU (RIGID PAVEMENT) DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) (Studi Kasus: Jalan Prof. M. Yamin, Kelurahan Puuwatu, Kota Kendari)

STABILITA || Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil · Vol. 8 No. 3 (2020)

DOI: 10.55679/jts.v8i3.16192
ISSN: 2657-2273, 2338-2899
Published: 2020-11-30
Publisher: Fakultas Teknik Jurusan Sipil Universitas Halu Oleo
Language: eng
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

ABSTRAKKajian penelitian tentang perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lenutr (flexible pavement) bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan biaya perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) maupun dari unsur pekerjaan pada jalan Prof.M.Yamin dan membandingkan kedua alternatif penggunaan lapisan perkerasan dari segi biaya konstruksi, sehingga didapatkan alternative yang paling baik dan menguntungkan. Perencanaan tebal perkerasan menggunakan analisis komponen (Metode Bina Marga) untuk lapis pondasi agregat dan metode yang dikembangkan oleh NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) untuk pondasi beton. Data yang diperlukan dalam analisis tersebut menliputi daftar harga satuan, draft penggunaan alat berat, harga satuan barang dan jasa, dan gambar pekerjaan. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh besaran Perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) sebesar Rp. 3.044.749.683,- dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) sebesar Rp. 2.993.386.135,- dengan selisih perbandingan biaya sebesar Rp. 51.363.548,- dan alternative yang paling menguntungkan adalah perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) dikarenakan biaya konstruksi untuk perkerasan tersebut lebih murah dibandingkan dari perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement). ABSTRACTThe research study on the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement construction aims to determine the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement as well as from the elements of work on Prof.M.Yamin's road and to compare the second alternative is the use of pavement layers in terms of construction costs, so that the best and most profitable alternative is obtained. Pavement thickness planning uses component analysis (Bina Marga Method) for aggregate base layers and a method developed by NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) for concrete foundations. The data required in the analysis includes a list of unit prices, drafts of heavy equipment use, unit prices for goods and services, and work drawings. The results of this study are that the ratio of the cost of rigid pavement construction is Rp. 3,044,749,683, - and flexible pavement of Rp. 2,993,386,135, - with a difference in cost comparison of Rp. 51,363,548, - and the most profitable alternative is flexible pavement because the construction cost for the pavement is cheaper than rigid pavement.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 170 co-authorship links · 13 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

Universitas Halu Oleo
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Affiliation unknown

Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles

Show as table

Co-author	Organisation	Joint articles
La Welendo	Affiliation unknown	17
sulha sulha	Affiliation unknown	9
Muh Thahir Azikin	Affiliation unknown	7
Fitriah Fitriah	Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry	7
Baso Mursidi	Affiliation unknown	6
Wayan Mustika	Affiliation unknown	6
Try Sugiyarto Soeparyanto	Universitas Halu Oleo	6
Ridwan Syah Nuhun	Universitas Halu Oleo	5
Ahmad Syarif Sukri	Universitas Halu Oleo	5
Patwayati Patwayati	Affiliation unknown	4
Masdiana Masdiana	Universitas Halu Oleo	4
Edward Ngii	Universitas Halu Oleo	4
Anafi Minmahddun	Universitas Halu Oleo	4
Adris A. Putra	Affiliation unknown	4
Mappa Nashrun	Affiliation unknown	3
Adris Ade Putra	Affiliation unknown	3
Fathur Rahman Rustan	Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka	3
Primus Santoso	Universitas Halu Oleo	2
Romy Talanipa	Universitas Halu Oleo	2
Yusuf Yusuf	Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari	2
Rahmat Madjid	Affiliation unknown	2
Isalman Isalman	Affiliation unknown	2
Juharsah Juharsah	Affiliation unknown	2
Eliyanti Agus Mokodompit	Affiliation unknown	2
Joko Raharjo	Affiliation unknown	2
Muhamad Thahir Azikin	Affiliation unknown	2
Muhamad Irwan	Affiliation unknown	2
Sriwiyati Mahrani	Affiliation unknown	2
Nursaban Rommy Suleman	Affiliation unknown	2
Nurwati Nurwati	Affiliation unknown	2
Ida Sutianingsih	Universitas Halu Oleo	2
Adris Ade Putra	Universitas Halu Oleo	2
La Ode Muhammad Nurrakhmad Arsyad	Affiliation unknown	2
Rudi Balaka	Universitas Halu Oleo	2
Utomo Pranata Hardiansyah	Universitas Halu Oleo	1
Ahmad Faqih Amsa	Affiliation unknown	1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/stabilita_jtsuho/oai, first harvested 31 Okt 2026, last seen 1 Nov 2026.

Original metadata (oai_dc)

<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN BIAYA KONSTRUKSI PERKERASAN KAKU (RIGID PAVEMENT) DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR (FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT) (Studi Kasus : Jalan Prof. M. Yamin, Kelurahan Puuwatu, Kota Kendari)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Lelepadang, Shania</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nuhun, Ridwansyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nasrul, Nasrul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ahmad, Siti Nurjanah</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Biaya konstruksi; Perkerasan kaku; Perkerasan lentur; Volume; Harga satuan</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">ABSTRAKKajian penelitian tentang perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lenutr (flexible pavement) bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan biaya perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) dan perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) maupun dari unsur pekerjaan pada jalan Prof.M.Yamin dan membandingkan kedua alternatif penggunaan lapisan perkerasan dari segi biaya konstruksi, sehingga didapatkan alternative yang paling  baik dan menguntungkan. Perencanaan tebal perkerasan menggunakan analisis komponen (Metode Bina Marga) untuk lapis pondasi agregat dan metode yang dikembangkan oleh NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) untuk pondasi beton. Data yang diperlukan dalam analisis tersebut menliputi daftar harga satuan, draft penggunaan alat berat, harga satuan barang dan jasa, dan gambar pekerjaan. Hasil penelitian ini diperoleh besaran Perbandingan biaya konstruksi perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement) sebesar Rp. 3.044.749.683,- dan perkerasan lentur (flexible  pavement) sebesar Rp.  2.993.386.135,- dengan selisih perbandingan biaya sebesar Rp. 51.363.548,- dan alternative yang paling menguntungkan adalah perkerasan lentur (flexible pavement) dikarenakan biaya konstruksi untuk perkerasan tersebut lebih murah dibandingkan dari perkerasan kaku (rigid pavement). ABSTRACTThe research study on the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement construction aims to determine the comparison of the cost of rigid pavement and flexible pavement as well as from the elements of work on Prof.M.Yamin's road and to compare the second alternative is the use of pavement layers in terms of construction costs, so that the best and most profitable alternative is obtained. Pavement thickness planning uses component analysis (Bina Marga Method) for aggregate base layers and a method developed by NAASRA (National Association of Australian State Road Authorities) for concrete foundations. The data required in the analysis includes a list of unit prices, drafts of heavy equipment use, unit prices for goods and services, and work drawings. The results of this study are that the ratio of the cost of rigid pavement construction is Rp. 3,044,749,683, - and flexible pavement of Rp. 2,993,386,135, - with a difference in cost comparison of Rp. 51,363,548, - and the most profitable alternative is flexible pavement because the construction cost for the pavement is cheaper than rigid pavement.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Fakultas Teknik Jurusan Sipil Universitas Halu Oleo</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2020-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/stabilita_jtsuho/article/view/16192</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.55679/jts.v8i3.16192</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">STABILITA || Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil; Vol 8, No 3 (2020): STABILITA || Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil; Hal. 149 – 158</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2657-2273</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2338-2899</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.55679/jts.v8i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/stabilita_jtsuho/article/view/16192/10853</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Shania Lelepadang, Ridwansyah Nuhun, Nasrul Nasrul, Siti Nurjanah Ahmad</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>