Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Sentralisasi Pengawasan Informasi Jaringan Menggunakan Blockchain Ethereum

Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK) · Vol. 7 No. 6 (2020) · pp. 1187–1196

DOI
10.25126/jtiik.2020722662
ISSN
2528-6579, 2355-7699
Published
2020-12-02
Publisher
Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
Language
id

Abstract

Pengawasan jaringan pada beberapa kantor yang berlokasi berjauhan sangat sulit dilakukan kerana keterbatasan tenaga ahli, biaya, dan teknologi pendukung. Penelitian yang sudah ada tidak dapat menyediakan sistem pengawasan jaringan yang mampu menjamin tiga aspek keamanan sekaligus, yaitu: availability, integrity, dan confidentiality. Teknologi blockchain mampu menyediakan sistem pengawasan jaringan secara terpusat dan aman dengan menjamin keamanan sistem komunikasi pelaporan dan sistem basis data pelaporan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan purwarupa sistem pengawasan konfigurasi dan statistik jaringan menggunakan jejaring blockchain Ethereum. Metode pengawasan mengharuskan program controller pada setiap jaringan kantor untuk secara berkala menarik informasi flow-rules dari setiap perangkat jaringan dan melaporkan data tersebut dalam sebuah transaksi ke jejaring blockchain. Pada penelitian ini dianalisa dua jenis skema pengiriman transaksi: transaksi berbasis smart contract dan transaksi berbasis zero-payment. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian, transaksi berbasis zero-payment secara rerata hanya membutuhkan sekitar 6 % dari biaya transaksi smart contract. Perkiraan biaya bulanan untuk pensamplingan informasi setiap 10 menit adalah sekitar 1,19 ether per-perangkat jaringan. Meskipun demikian, metode pada penelitian ini lebih sesuai untuk diterapkan pada jejaring Ethereum jenis Proof-of-Authority (PoA) dibandingkan jenis Proof-of-Work (PoW) karena harga Ether yang mahal. AbstractCentralized monitoring of remote networks is hard to implement due to the high cost, lack of experts, and the missing key technologies. The existing researches are unable to provide a secure, centralized monitoring system that satisfies three security aspects, namely: availability, integrity, and confidentiality. Blockchain technology meets those three requirements by providing a reliable reporting and immutable database system. In this paper, we proposed a prototype of a centralized monitoring system that records network statistics and configurations into the blockchain ledger. The method requires the network controller to periodically fetch network information from every network device and submit it as a single blockchain transaction. We compare two kinds of transaction schema, smart-contract based and zero-payment based reporting schemes. The evaluations show that zero-payment transactions only cost 6 % of the smart-contract transactions. The estimation of the monthly cost is 1.19 ether per-device for 10-minutes data sampling. Nevertheless, the proposed method is applicable only for the Proof-of-Authority (PoA) Ethereum networks. It is not feasible for the Ethereum main network that uses Proof-of-Work (PoW) due to the high cost of Ether.

Collaboration network of the authors

11 authors · 25 co-authorship links · 6 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Institut Teknologi Telkom Purwokerto
  • Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Didi RosiyadiNational Research and Innovation Agency2
Taufik Iqbal RamdhaniNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Yusnan Hasani SiregarIndonesian Institute of Sciences1
Heru SusantoNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Hadi SusantoNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Iwan Rizal SetiawanNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Taufik Ibnu SalimNational Research and Innovation Agency1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/en/oai, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Sentralisasi Pengawasan Informasi Jaringan Menggunakan Blockchain Ethereum</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Sidiq, Muhammad Fajar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Basuki, Akbari Indra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Firdaus, Halim</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Baihaqi, Muhammad Aldi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Pengawasan jaringan pada beberapa kantor yang berlokasi berjauhan sangat sulit dilakukan kerana keterbatasan tenaga ahli, biaya, dan teknologi pendukung. Penelitian yang sudah ada tidak dapat menyediakan sistem pengawasan jaringan yang mampu menjamin tiga aspek keamanan sekaligus, yaitu: availability, integrity, dan confidentiality. Teknologi blockchain mampu menyediakan sistem pengawasan jaringan secara terpusat dan aman dengan menjamin keamanan sistem komunikasi pelaporan dan sistem basis data pelaporan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyajikan purwarupa sistem pengawasan konfigurasi dan statistik jaringan menggunakan jejaring blockchain Ethereum. Metode pengawasan mengharuskan program controller pada setiap jaringan kantor untuk secara berkala menarik informasi flow-rules dari setiap perangkat jaringan dan melaporkan data tersebut dalam sebuah transaksi ke jejaring blockchain. Pada penelitian ini dianalisa dua jenis skema pengiriman transaksi: transaksi berbasis smart contract dan transaksi berbasis zero-payment. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian, transaksi berbasis zero-payment secara rerata hanya membutuhkan sekitar 6 % dari biaya transaksi smart contract. Perkiraan biaya bulanan untuk pensamplingan informasi setiap 10 menit adalah sekitar 1,19 ether per-perangkat jaringan. Meskipun demikian, metode pada penelitian ini lebih sesuai untuk diterapkan pada jejaring Ethereum jenis Proof-of-Authority (PoA) dibandingkan jenis Proof-of-Work (PoW) karena harga Ether yang mahal. AbstractCentralized monitoring of remote networks is hard to implement due to the high cost, lack of experts, and the missing key technologies. The existing researches are unable to provide a secure, centralized monitoring system that satisfies three security aspects, namely: availability, integrity, and confidentiality. Blockchain technology meets those three requirements by providing a reliable reporting and immutable database system. In this paper, we proposed a prototype of a centralized monitoring system that records network statistics and configurations into the blockchain ledger. The method requires the network controller to periodically fetch network information from every network device and submit it as a single blockchain transaction. We compare two kinds of transaction schema, smart-contract based and zero-payment based reporting schemes. The evaluations show that zero-payment transactions only cost 6 % of the smart-contract transactions. The estimation of the monthly cost is 1.19 ether per-device for 10-minutes data sampling. Nevertheless, the proposed method is applicable only for the Proof-of-Authority (PoA) Ethereum networks. It is not feasible for the Ethereum main network that uses Proof-of-Work (PoW) due to the high cost of Ether.  </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-12-02</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/2662</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.25126/jtiik.2020722662</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol 7 No 6: Desember 2020; 1187-1196</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol. 7 No. 6: Desember 2020; 1187-1196</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2355-7699</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.25126/jtiik.202076</dc:source>
	<dc:language>id</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/2662/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>