Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Analisis Pengembangan Jaringan Komputer UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Menggunakan Perbandingan Protokol Routing Statik dan Routing Dinamis OSPF

Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK) · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2021) · pp. 235–244

DOI
10.25126/jtiik.2021822983
ISSN
2528-6579, 2355-7699
Published
2021-03-25
Publisher
Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
Language
id

Abstract

Penelitian ini menjelaskan tentang perbandingan routing sebagai salah satu manajemen jaringan komputer. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah melakukan analisis terhadap protokol routing statik dengan routing dinamis OSPF pada jaringan komputer di lingkungan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dengan metode studi literatur dan wawancara dalam pengumpulan data. Penelitian dibuat berdasarkan pemodelan (simulasi) berbasis aplikasi EVE-NG. Performa yang dihasilkan dari perbandingan routing tersebut diukur menggunakan parameter QoS meliputi nilai dari throughput, packet loss, delay, dan jitter. Pengujian kinerja jaringan menggunakan skenario normal dan sibuk pada routing statik dan dinamis OSPF antara lain skenario normal throughput untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 598.10Bps dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 598.34Bps, sedangkan skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 598.82Bps dan nilai untuk OSPF sebesar 597.58Bps. Packet loss skenario normal routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.23% dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.27% serta skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.24% dan OSPF sebanyak 0.26%. Nilai delay skenario normal routing statik protokol sebanyak 59.39ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 59.36ms, sedangkan skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 59.32ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 59.44ms. Jitter menggunakan skenario normal protokol routing statik sebanyak 0.98ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.98ms serta skenario sibuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.98ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.99ms. Parameter QoS menunjukkan bahwa throughput dan delay maka routing statik lebih optimal dibandingkan OSPF pada skenario sibuk, sedangkan pada skenario normal dan sibuk jitter dan packet loss lebih optimal routing protokol statik. AbstractThis study describes the comparison of routing as one of computer network management. The purpose of this study is to analyze static routing protocols with OSPF dynamic routing on computer networks in the State Islamic University of Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta with literature study methods and interviews in data collection. The study was made based on modeling (simulation) based on EVE-NG applications. The performance resulting from the comparison of routing is measured using QoS parameters including the value of throughput, packet loss, delay, and jitter. Network performance testing uses normal and busy scenarios on static and dynamic OSPF routing, including normal throughput scenarios for static protocol routing as much as 598.10Bps and values for OSPF as much as 598.34Bps, while busy scenarios for static protocol routing as much as 598.82Bps and values for OSPF as 597.58 Bps. Normal packet routing scenario static routing protocols are 0.23% and OSPF values are 0.27% and busy scenarios for static protocol routing are 0.24% and OSPF are 0.26%. The normal scenario static routing protocol delay value is 59.39ms and the value for OSPF is 59.36ms, while the busy scenario for static protocol routing is 59.32ms and the value for OSPF is 59.44ms. Jitter uses a normal scenario of 0.98ms static routing protocol and 0.98ms for OSPF and 0.98ms for busy routing protocol scenarios and 0.99ms for OSPF. QoS parameters indicate that throughput and delay static routing is more optimal than OSPF in busy scenarios, whereas in normal and busy scenarios jitter and packet loss are more optimal static protocol routing.

Collaboration network of the authors

6 authors · 6 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
  • Islamic University of Indonesia
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ahmad SubkiIslamic University of Indonesia1
Yudi PrayudiIslamic University of Indonesia1
Rizki DewantaraAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Zaki AnbariSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/en/oai, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Analisis Pengembangan Jaringan Komputer UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Menggunakan Perbandingan Protokol Routing Statik dan Routing Dinamis OSPF</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Gatra, Rahmadhan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Sugiantoro, Bambang</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Penelitian ini menjelaskan tentang perbandingan routing sebagai salah satu manajemen jaringan komputer. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah melakukan analisis terhadap protokol routing statik dengan routing dinamis OSPF pada jaringan komputer di lingkungan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dengan metode studi literatur dan wawancara dalam pengumpulan data. Penelitian dibuat berdasarkan pemodelan (simulasi) berbasis aplikasi EVE-NG. Performa yang dihasilkan dari perbandingan routing tersebut diukur menggunakan parameter QoS meliputi nilai dari throughput, packet loss, delay, dan jitter. Pengujian kinerja jaringan menggunakan skenario normal dan sibuk pada routing statik dan dinamis OSPF antara lain skenario normal throughput untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 598.10Bps dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 598.34Bps, sedangkan skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 598.82Bps dan nilai untuk OSPF sebesar 597.58Bps. Packet loss skenario normal routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.23% dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.27% serta skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.24% dan OSPF sebanyak 0.26%. Nilai delay skenario normal routing statik protokol sebanyak 59.39ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 59.36ms, sedangkan skenario sibuk untuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 59.32ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 59.44ms. Jitter menggunakan skenario normal protokol routing statik sebanyak 0.98ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.98ms serta skenario sibuk routing protokol statik sebanyak 0.98ms dan nilai untuk OSPF sebanyak 0.99ms. Parameter QoS menunjukkan bahwa throughput dan delay maka routing statik lebih optimal dibandingkan OSPF pada skenario sibuk, sedangkan pada skenario normal dan sibuk jitter dan packet loss lebih optimal routing protokol statik. AbstractThis study describes the comparison of routing as one of computer network management. The purpose of this study is to analyze static routing protocols with OSPF dynamic routing on computer networks in the State Islamic University of Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta with literature study methods and interviews in data collection. The study was made based on modeling (simulation) based on EVE-NG applications. The performance resulting from the comparison of routing is measured using QoS parameters including the value of throughput, packet loss, delay, and jitter. Network performance testing uses normal and busy scenarios on static and dynamic OSPF routing, including normal throughput scenarios for static protocol routing as much as 598.10Bps and values for OSPF as much as 598.34Bps, while busy scenarios for static protocol routing as much as 598.82Bps and values for OSPF as 597.58 Bps. Normal packet routing scenario static routing protocols are 0.23% and OSPF values are 0.27% and busy scenarios for static protocol routing are 0.24% and OSPF are 0.26%. The normal scenario static routing protocol delay value is 59.39ms and the value for OSPF is 59.36ms, while the busy scenario for static protocol routing is 59.32ms and the value for OSPF is 59.44ms. Jitter uses a normal scenario of 0.98ms static routing protocol and 0.98ms for OSPF and 0.98ms for busy routing protocol scenarios and 0.99ms for OSPF. QoS parameters indicate that throughput and delay static routing is more optimal than OSPF in busy scenarios, whereas in normal and busy scenarios jitter and packet loss are more optimal static protocol routing.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-03-25</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/2983</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.25126/jtiik.2021822983</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol 8 No 2: April 2021; 235-244</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol. 8 No. 2: April 2021; 235-244</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2355-7699</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.25126/jtiik.202182</dc:source>
	<dc:language>id</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/2983/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>