Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Rekomendasi Pengembangan Fasilitas Wisata Tugu Pahlawan Surabaya Melalui Visualisasi Dashboard Hasil Klasifikasi Analisis Sentimen Ulasan Pengunjung

Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK) · Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022) · pp. 363–372

DOI
10.25126/jtiik.2022925655
ISSN
2528-6579, 2355-7699
Published
2022-02-24
Publisher
Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
Language
id

Abstract

Tugu Pahlawan Surabaya merupakan salah satu pariwisata andalan Kota Surabaya yang selalu berupaya memperhatikan ulasan pengunjung sebagai acuan evaluasi. Namun, pengelola tidak memiliki teknologi yang mampu mengumpulkan, mengolah, dan menganalisis seluruh data ulasan yang dapat menghasilkan informasi secara ringkas. Salah satu solusi dapat dilakukan melalui analisis sentimen pada level aspek terhadap aspek edukasi, fasilitas, kebersihan, pelayanan, dan umum dengan penyajian informasi dalam bentuk dashboard. Analisis sentimen dilakukan menggunakan Support Vector Machine terhadap 2180 data ulasan selama 2 tahun terakhir yang diambil dari Google Review. Ulasan terbanyak terdapat pada aspek fasilitas sebanyak 538 ulasan dengan sebaran sentimen 285 ulasan positif, 95 ulasan negatif, dan 158 ulasan netral. Rekomendasi berdasarkan kekuatan dan kelemahan saat ini adalah penyediaan lahan atau objek foto bernuansa sejarah pahlawan secara lebih nyata serta penyediaan ventilasi terbuka atau standing cooler di beberapa area. Berdasarkan confusion matrix, nilai F1-Score menjadi penentu seberapa baik model mengklasifikan data daripada nilai Accuracy dikarenakan dataset yang dimiliki bersifat imbalance sehingga kesalahan prediksi pada precision atau recall sangat memungkinkan terjadi. Kesalahan prediksi banyak ditemukan pada kelas sentimen netral. Keseluruhan hasil klasifikasi disajikan dalam bentuk dashboard dengan nilai SUS Score 77,5, menandakan bahwa dashboard dapat diterima dengan baik oleh responden sebagai pengguna. Abstract Tugu Pahlawan Surabaya is one of the mainstays of tourism in Surabaya city which always tries to pay attention to visitor reviews as a reference for evaluation. However, the managers do not have technology capable of collecting, processing and analyzing all review datas that can produce information in a concise manner. One solution can be done through sentiment analysis at the aspect level of education, facilities, cleanliness, service, and general aspects by presenting information in the form of a dashboard. Sentiment analysis was carried out using the Support Vector Machine on 2180 review datas for the last 2 years taken from Google Reviews. The most reviews were on the facility aspect in total of 538 reviews with a sentiment distribution of 285 positive reviews, 95 negative reviews and 158 neutral reviews. Recommendations based on current strengths and weaknesses are providing more real area or photo objects with historical nuances of heroes and providing open ventilation or standing coolers in several areas. Based on the confusion matrix, the F1-Score value determines how well the model classifies data rather than the Accuracy value because the dataset is imbalance so that prediction errors in precision or recall are very possible. Prediction errors are more likely to be found in the neutral sentiment class. The overall classification results are presented in the form of a dashboard with a SUS Score of 77.5, indicating that the dashboard is well received by respondents

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 93 co-authorship links · 42 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  • Institut Teknologi, Sains, dan Kesehatan RS.DR. Soepraoen Kesdam V/BRW
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Vicky ZilvanIndonesian Institute of Sciences3
Asri Rizki YulianiIndonesian Institute of Sciences3
Ade RamdanIndonesian Institute of Sciences3
Sutrisno .Affiliation unknown2
Tibyani TibyaniUniversity of Brawijaya2
Hilman Ferdinandus PardedeNational Research and Innovation Agency2
Wahyu Teja KusumaInstitut Teknologi, Sains, dan Kesehatan RS.DR. Soepraoen Kesdam V/BRW2
Herman TolleUniversity of Brawijaya2
Welly PurnomoUniversity of Brawijaya2
Dian Eka RatnawatiUniversity of Brawijaya2
Nur Laita Rizki AmaliaUniversity of Brawijaya2
Satrio Hadi WijoyoUniversity of Brawijaya2
Reza Andria SAffiliation unknown1
Sarwosri SarwosriInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Imam CholissodinUniversity of Brawijaya1
Budi Darma SetiawanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Farhanna Mar’iUniversity of Brawijaya1
Rizal Arif ZulfikarUniversity of Brawijaya1
I Putu Pradnyana IswaraUniversity of Brawijaya1
Irvi OktanisaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Fitra Abdurrachman BachtiarUniversity of Brawijaya1
Iqbal Taufiq Ahmad NurUniversity of Brawijaya1
Aditya Hari BawonoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nabila Divanadia LuckyanaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Yusi Tyroni MursityoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Yustinus Radityo PradanaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Komang Candra BrataUniversity of Brawijaya1
Santi Yunika SufianaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mochammad IzzuddinUniversity of Brawijaya1
Syaiful AnamUniversity of Brawijaya1
Onky PrasetyoUniversity of Brawijaya1
R. Budiarianto Suryo KusumoNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Abdul Harris WicaksonoUniversity of Brawijaya1
Didik KrisnandiNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Ana HeryanaNational Research and Innovation Agency1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/en/oai, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Rekomendasi Pengembangan Fasilitas Wisata Tugu Pahlawan Surabaya Melalui Visualisasi Dashboard Hasil Klasifikasi Analisis Sentimen Ulasan Pengunjung</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Mahardika, Fawwaz Roja</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Supianto, Ahmad Afif</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Setiawan, Nanang Yudi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Yuwana, Raden Sandra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Suryawati, Endang</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Tugu Pahlawan Surabaya merupakan salah satu pariwisata andalan Kota Surabaya yang selalu berupaya memperhatikan ulasan pengunjung sebagai acuan evaluasi. Namun, pengelola tidak memiliki teknologi yang mampu mengumpulkan, mengolah, dan menganalisis seluruh data ulasan yang dapat menghasilkan informasi secara ringkas. Salah satu solusi dapat dilakukan melalui analisis sentimen pada level aspek terhadap aspek edukasi, fasilitas, kebersihan, pelayanan, dan umum dengan penyajian informasi dalam bentuk dashboard. Analisis sentimen dilakukan menggunakan Support Vector Machine terhadap 2180 data ulasan selama 2 tahun terakhir yang diambil dari Google Review. Ulasan terbanyak terdapat pada aspek fasilitas sebanyak 538 ulasan dengan sebaran sentimen 285 ulasan positif, 95 ulasan negatif, dan 158 ulasan netral. Rekomendasi berdasarkan kekuatan dan kelemahan saat ini adalah penyediaan lahan atau objek foto bernuansa sejarah pahlawan secara lebih nyata serta penyediaan ventilasi terbuka atau standing cooler di beberapa area. Berdasarkan confusion matrix, nilai F1-Score menjadi penentu seberapa baik model mengklasifikan data daripada nilai Accuracy dikarenakan dataset yang dimiliki bersifat imbalance sehingga kesalahan prediksi pada precision atau recall sangat memungkinkan terjadi. Kesalahan prediksi banyak ditemukan pada kelas sentimen netral. Keseluruhan hasil klasifikasi disajikan dalam bentuk dashboard dengan nilai SUS Score 77,5, menandakan bahwa dashboard dapat diterima dengan baik oleh responden sebagai pengguna. Abstract Tugu Pahlawan Surabaya is one of the mainstays of tourism in Surabaya city which always tries to pay attention to visitor reviews as a reference for evaluation. However, the managers do not have technology capable of collecting, processing and analyzing all review datas that can produce information in a concise manner. One solution can be done through sentiment analysis at the aspect level of education, facilities, cleanliness, service, and general aspects by presenting information in the form of a dashboard. Sentiment analysis was carried out using the Support Vector Machine on 2180 review datas for the last 2 years taken from Google Reviews. The most reviews were on the facility aspect in total of 538 reviews with a sentiment distribution of 285 positive reviews, 95 negative reviews and 158 neutral reviews. Recommendations based on current strengths and weaknesses are providing more real area or photo objects with historical nuances of heroes and providing open ventilation or standing coolers in several areas. Based on the confusion matrix, the F1-Score value determines how well the model classifies data rather than the Accuracy value because the dataset is imbalance so that prediction errors in precision or recall are very possible. Prediction errors are more likely to be found in the neutral sentiment class. The overall classification results are presented in the form of a dashboard with a SUS Score of 77.5, indicating that the dashboard is well received by respondents</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-02-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/5655</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.25126/jtiik.2022925655</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol 9 No 2: April 2022; 363-372</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol. 9 No. 2: April 2022; 363-372</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2355-7699</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.25126/jtiik.202292</dc:source>
	<dc:language>id</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/5655/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>