Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 2

Perbandingan Pretrained Model Transformer pada Deteksi Ulasan Palsu

Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK) · Vol. 9 No. 3 (2022) · pp. 597–604

DOI
10.25126/jtiik.2022935696
ISSN
2528-6579, 2355-7699
Published
2022-06-20
Publisher
Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
Language
id

Abstract

Kemudahan untuk memperoleh informasi saat ini, telah sedikit membantu hidup kita. Seperti mencari ulasan untuk menimbang tempat atau barang yang akan dipilih. Beberapa orang memanfaatkan hal tersebut dengan membuat ulasan palsu untuk kepentingan mereka sendiri. Sehingga deteksi ulasan palsu sangat dibutuhkan. Model Transformer saat ini banyak diterapkan pada pemrosesan bahasa alami karena kinerja yang diperoleh nya sangat baik. Ada dua pendekatan yang dapat dilakukan dalam model Transformer yaitu pre-training dan fine-tuning. Penelitian sebelumnya telah banyak menggunakan fine-tuning dari model Transformer dikarenakan adanya kemudahan dalam pelatihan, waktu yang lebih sedikit, biaya dan kebutuhan lingkungan yang lebih rendah dibanding proses pre-training. Akan tetapi penelitian sebelumnya masih sedikit yang membandingkan model deep learning dengan fine-tuning yang khusus diterapkan pada deteksi ulasan palsu. Penelitian ini melakukan perbandingan model Transformer menggunakan pendekatan fine-tuning dengan metode deep learning yaitu CNN dengan berbagai pretrained word embedding untuk mengatasi deteksi ulasan palsu pada dataset Ott. Model RoBERTa mengungguli model Transformer dan deep learning dimana nilai akurasi 90,8%; precision 90%; recall 91,8% dan f1-score 90,8%. Namun dari segi waktu komputasi model pelatihan, DistilBERT memperoleh waktu komputasi terkecil yaitu dengan nilai 200,5 detik. Meskipun begitu, hasil yang diperoleh model Transformer maupun deep learning memiliki kinerja yang baik untuk deteksi ulasan palsu pada dataset Ott.AbstractThe ease of obtaining information today has helped our lives, like looking for reviews to weigh the place or item to choose. Some people take advantage of this by creating spam reviews for their benefit. So the detection of spam reviews is needed. Transformer models are currently widely applied to natural language processing because they have outstanding performance. Two approaches in the Transformer model is pre-training and fine-tuning. Previous studies have used a lot of fine-tuning due to the ease of training, less time, costs, and lower environmental requirements than the pre-training process. However, a few previous studies compare deep learning models with fine-tuning applied explicitly for detecting spam reviews. This study compares the Transformer model using a fine-tuning approach with a deep learning method, namely CNN, which uses various pre-trained word embedding to overcome the detection of false reviews in the Ott dataset. The result is RoBERTa model outperforms between Transformer and deep learning models, where the accuracy is 90.8%, precision is 90%, recall is 91.8%, and f1-score is 90.8%. Afterward, DistilBERT models obtained the shortest computation time with 200.5 seconds. However, the results obtained by both Transformer and deep learning models perform well to detect spam reviews in the Ott dataset.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 80 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • University of Brawijaya
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Fajar PradanaUniversity of Brawijaya10
Retno Indah RokhmawatiUniversity of Brawijaya3
Muhammad WafiUniversity of Brawijaya3
Herman TolleUniversity of Brawijaya3
Bayu PriyambadhaUniversity of Brawijaya2
Satrio Agung WicaksonoUniversity of Brawijaya2
Achmad BasukiUniversity of Brawijaya2
Imam CholissodinUniversity of Brawijaya2
Novanto YudistiraUniversity of Brawijaya2
Hurriyatul FitriyahUniversity of Brawijaya2
Rizal MaulanaUniversity of Brawijaya2
Randy Cahya WihandikaUniversity of Brawijaya2
Muhammad Ali FauziUniversity of Brawijaya2
Dahnial SyauqyUniversity of Brawijaya2
Firnanda Al Islama Achyunda PutraUniversity of Brawijaya1
Wayan Firdaus MahmudyUniversity of Brawijaya1
Joseph Ananda SugihdharmaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Rizal Setya PerdanaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nathanael Victor DarenohUniversity of Brawijaya1
Aditya RachmadiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ihwanudien Hasan RobbaniUniversity of Brawijaya1
Enny TrisnawatiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Rakhmadina NoviyantiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Afrizal RivaldiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Waskitha WijayaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Aulia Akhrian SyahidiUniversity of Brawijaya1
Fajerin BiabdillahUniversity of Brawijaya1
Nanang Yudi SetiawanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Iqbal Taufiq Ahmad NurUniversity of Brawijaya1
Indra SyahputraUniversity of Brawijaya1
Bayu SutawijayaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Mochammad Dearifaldi Al IkhsanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Sulandri SulandriUniversity of Brawijaya1
Rona SalsabilaUniversity of Brawijaya1
Muhammad ZulfikarrahmanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Budi Darma SetiawanUniversity of Brawijaya1
Muhammad Nugraha Delta RevanzaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/en/oai, first harvested 27 Okt 2026, last seen 27 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Perbandingan Pretrained Model Transformer pada Deteksi Ulasan Palsu</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Awalina, Aisyah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Bachtiar, Fitra Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Utaminingrum, Fitri</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Kemudahan untuk memperoleh informasi saat ini, telah sedikit membantu hidup kita. Seperti mencari ulasan untuk menimbang tempat atau barang yang akan dipilih. Beberapa orang memanfaatkan hal tersebut dengan membuat ulasan palsu untuk kepentingan mereka sendiri. Sehingga deteksi ulasan palsu sangat dibutuhkan. Model Transformer saat ini banyak diterapkan pada pemrosesan bahasa alami karena kinerja yang diperoleh nya sangat baik. Ada dua pendekatan yang dapat dilakukan dalam model Transformer yaitu pre-training dan fine-tuning. Penelitian sebelumnya telah banyak menggunakan fine-tuning dari model Transformer dikarenakan adanya kemudahan dalam pelatihan, waktu yang lebih sedikit, biaya dan kebutuhan lingkungan yang lebih rendah dibanding proses pre-training. Akan tetapi penelitian sebelumnya masih sedikit yang membandingkan model deep learning dengan fine-tuning yang khusus diterapkan pada deteksi ulasan palsu. Penelitian ini melakukan perbandingan model Transformer menggunakan pendekatan fine-tuning dengan metode deep learning yaitu CNN dengan berbagai pretrained word embedding untuk mengatasi deteksi ulasan palsu pada dataset Ott. Model RoBERTa mengungguli model Transformer dan deep learning dimana nilai akurasi 90,8%; precision 90%; recall 91,8% dan f1-score 90,8%. Namun dari segi waktu komputasi model pelatihan, DistilBERT memperoleh waktu komputasi terkecil yaitu dengan nilai 200,5 detik. Meskipun begitu, hasil yang diperoleh model Transformer maupun deep learning memiliki kinerja yang baik untuk deteksi ulasan palsu pada dataset Ott.AbstractThe ease of obtaining information today has helped our lives, like looking for reviews to weigh the place or item to choose. Some people take advantage of this by creating spam reviews for their benefit. So the detection of spam reviews is needed. Transformer models are currently widely applied to natural language processing because they have outstanding performance. Two approaches in the Transformer model is pre-training and fine-tuning. Previous studies have used a lot of fine-tuning due to the ease of training, less time, costs, and lower environmental requirements than the pre-training process. However, a few previous studies compare deep learning models with fine-tuning applied explicitly for detecting spam reviews. This study compares the Transformer model using a fine-tuning approach with a deep learning method, namely CNN, which uses various pre-trained word embedding to overcome the detection of false reviews in the Ott dataset. The result is RoBERTa model outperforms between Transformer and deep learning models, where the accuracy is 90.8%, precision is 90%, recall is 91.8%, and f1-score is 90.8%. Afterward, DistilBERT models obtained the shortest computation time with 200.5 seconds. However, the results obtained by both Transformer and deep learning models perform well to detect spam reviews in the Ott dataset.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/5696</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.25126/jtiik.2022935696</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol 9 No 3: Juni 2022; 597-604</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer; Vol. 9 No. 3: Juni 2022; 597-604</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2528-6579</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2355-7699</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.25126/jtiik.202293</dc:source>
	<dc:language>id</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://jtiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/jtiik/article/view/5696/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>