Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Application of Jurisprudence to the Judicial Review Authority in Constitutional Court Decisions

Papua Law Journal · Vol. UME (2019) · hlm. 1–13

DOI
10.31957/plj.v4i1.1042
ISSN
2540-9166, 2540-7716
Terbit
2019-12-01
Penerbit
Faculty of Law Cenderawasih University
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

The validity of jurisprudence as one of the recognized legal sources in Indonesia has drawn broad attention and has emerged as an area for attention to conduct research. Indonesia heavily influenced by the civil law system basically does not commit to jurisprudence. However, if there are considerably contrary decisions with prior decisions, it becomes a debate about how the validity of existing jurisprudence. The Constitutional Court as one of the actors of judicial power has the authority to conduct judicial review of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In line with such authority, the Constitutional Court is sometimes conflicted with a previous decision which has presented a landmark yet it is not followed. In other words, there is contrary between the previous and the present decisions. To investigate the matter, the present study focuses on how the jurisprudence applies to judicial review in the Constitutional Court decisions. The analytical method adopted literature study through a case study approach. The conclusion obtained in this line of research is that jurisprudence refers to source of legislation that can be a reference in deciding a case for judicial review yet it does not bind judges to deviate it based on logical reasons in accordance with the principles of the judicial independence and accountability and the living constitution.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

2 penulis · 1 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Tarumanagara University
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ejournal.uncen.ac.id/index.php/PLJ/oai, pertama di-harvest 1 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Application of Jurisprudence to the Judicial Review Authority in Constitutional Court Decisions</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Akasian, Erill Jonathan Samuel</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kurniadi, Prycillya Agatha</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Testing laws</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Jurisprudence</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The validity of jurisprudence as one of the recognized legal sources in Indonesia has drawn broad attention and has emerged as an area for attention to conduct research. Indonesia heavily influenced by the civil law system basically does not commit to jurisprudence. However, if there are considerably contrary decisions with prior decisions, it becomes a debate about how the validity of existing jurisprudence. The Constitutional Court as one of the actors of judicial power has the authority to conduct judicial review of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In line with such authority, the Constitutional Court is sometimes conflicted with a previous decision which has presented a landmark yet it is not followed. In other words, there is contrary between the previous and the present decisions. To investigate the matter, the present study focuses on how the jurisprudence applies to judicial review in the Constitutional Court decisions. The analytical method adopted literature study through a case study approach. The conclusion obtained in this line of research is that jurisprudence refers to source of legislation that can be a reference in deciding a case for judicial review yet it does not bind judges to deviate it based on logical reasons in accordance with the principles of the judicial independence and accountability and the living constitution.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Faculty of Law Cenderawasih University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-12-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ejournal.uncen.ac.id/index.php/PLJ/article/view/1042</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.31957/plj.v4i1.1042</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Papua Law Journal; VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, 2019; 1-13</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id-ID">Papua Law Journal; VOLUME 4 ISSUE 1, 2019; 1-13</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2540-9166</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2540-7716</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ejournal.uncen.ac.id/index.php/PLJ/article/view/1042/pdf</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Papua Law Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>