Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Prosiding

AI in International Relations: A Triumph for Progress or a Menace to Humanity?

World Conference on Governance and Social Sciences · Vol. 2 (2024) · pp. 9–15

DOI
10.31947/wcgss,vol2,44266
ISSN
3026-7218
Published
2024-12-30
Publisher
Faculty of Social and Political Sciences
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

The exponential growth of the development and use of artificial intelligence has resulted in much consideration for its eventual utilization in international relations. Its much-heralded reputation for its ability to assess information at a level almost akin to that of a human has enabled discussions to leverage its capacities to resolve current issues, be they geopolitical or environmental. Its capacity to break social and cultural barriers through automated data analysis, efficient coordination, and advanced interpretations has painted its reputation as an indispensable tool for diplomacy, a guideline for immigration control, and an antidote against climate change. However, even with such an array of benefits, its potential for misuse, excessive use of resources, and even weaponization has led many to question its true capacity or intentions. This paper is then devised as a response to the notion of continued use of AI in international affairs. It comprises a comprehensive and qualitative insight into its applications on three main aspects, namely diplomacy, immigration, and climate change, that is based on observations toward selected references. The findings made in this paper allude to the need for further regulations and human intervention to prevent potential misuse or negative exploitation.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

No co-authors found in Melola yet.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/wcgss/oai, first harvested 2 Nov 2026, last seen 2 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">AI in International Relations: A Triumph for Progress or a Menace to Humanity?</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wahid, Ashrie</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">artificial intelligence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">climate change</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">diplomacy</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">progress</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">change</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">immigration</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">global affairs</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The exponential growth of the development and use of artificial intelligence has resulted in much consideration for its eventual utilization in international relations. Its much-heralded reputation for its ability to assess information at a level almost akin to that of a human has enabled discussions to leverage its capacities to resolve current issues, be they geopolitical or environmental. Its capacity to break social and cultural barriers through automated data analysis, efficient coordination, and advanced interpretations has painted its reputation as an indispensable tool for diplomacy, a guideline for immigration control, and an antidote against climate change. However, even with such an array of benefits, its potential for misuse, excessive use of resources, and even weaponization has led many to question its true capacity or intentions. This paper is then devised as a response to the notion of continued use of AI in international affairs. It comprises a comprehensive and qualitative insight into its applications on three main aspects, namely diplomacy, immigration, and climate change, that is based on observations toward selected references. The findings made in this paper allude to the need for further regulations and human intervention to prevent potential misuse or negative exploitation.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Social and Political Sciences</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-12-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/wcgss/article/view/44266</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.31947/wcgss,vol2,44266</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">World Conference on Governance and Social Sciences; Vol. 2 (2024); 9 - 15</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3026-7218</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.31947/wcgss.v2i</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/wcgss/article/view/44266/12829</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 World Conference on Governance and Social Sciences</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>