Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

PROBLEMATIKA IMPUNITAS: STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN HAM YANG BERAT AFRIKA SELATAN DAN INDONESIA: THE PROBLEM OF IMPUNITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RESOLUTION OF GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND INDONESIA

Jurnal Nomokrasi · Vol. 3 No. mokrasi (2025) · pp. 150–162

Published
2025-04-30
Publisher
Lembaga Debat Hukum dan Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin
Language
id

Abstract

English

Indonesia still faces various obstacles, even though it has been regulated in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts. This study analyzes these problems through legislative approaches, cases, and comparisons with South Africa. The results show that the main obstacles lie in the lack of political will, the unsynchronized work between Komnas HAM and the Attorney General's Office, the deep-rooted culture of impunity, and the obstacles to legal proof. As a result, past gross human rights cases have not been resolved in a fair and transparent manner. In comparison, South Africa has successfully built a model of resolution through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that can serve as a reference in creating transitional justice in Indonesia. This research emphasizes the importance of institutional reform, strengthening the legal system, and strong political commitment in order for the state to fulfill its responsibility to uphold justice and protect human rights.

Bahasa Indonesia

Penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia berat di Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan, meskipun telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan HAM. Penelitian ini menganalisis problematika tersebut melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan perbandingan dengan Afrika Selatan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kendala utama terletak pada lemahnya kemauan politik, tidak sinkronnya kerja antara Komnas HAM dan Kejaksaan Agung, budaya impunitas yang mengakar, serta hambatan pembuktian secara hukum. Akibatnya, kasus-kasus HAM berat di masa lalu tidak terselesaikan secara adil. Sebagai perbandingan, Afrika Selatan berhasil membangun model penyelesaian melalui Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi yang dapat menjadi rujukan dalam menciptakan keadilan transisional di Indonesia.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

6 authors · 13 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ratu Azra AzzahraAffiliation unknown3
Adisti Zakia PutriAffiliation unknown3

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jnomokrasi/oai, first harvested 2 Nov 2026, last seen 2 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">PROBLEMATIKA IMPUNITAS: STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN HAM YANG BERAT AFRIKA SELATAN DAN INDONESIA: THE PROBLEM OF IMPUNITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RESOLUTION OF GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND INDONESIA</dc:title>
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">PROBLEMATIKA IMPUNITAS: STUDI PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN PELANGGARAN HAM YANG BERAT AFRIKA SELATAN DAN INDONESIA: THE PROBLEM OF IMPUNITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE RESOLUTION OF GROSS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND INDONESIA</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sagita, Aluna Putri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Sagita, Aluna Putri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Filadelfia, Adel Zain</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Sagina, Aluna Putri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Almaqhvira, Annisa</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Gross human rights violations</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Justice for the victims</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Truth and Reconciliation Commission</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Indonesia still faces various obstacles, even though it has been regulated in Law Number 26 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts. This study analyzes these problems through legislative approaches, cases, and comparisons with South Africa. The results show that the main obstacles lie in the lack of political will, the unsynchronized work between Komnas HAM and the Attorney General's Office, the deep-rooted culture of impunity, and the obstacles to legal proof. As a result, past gross human rights cases have not been resolved in a fair and transparent manner. In comparison, South Africa has successfully built a model of resolution through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission that can serve as a reference in creating transitional justice in Indonesia. This research emphasizes the importance of institutional reform, strengthening the legal system, and strong political commitment in order for the state to fulfill its responsibility to uphold justice and protect human rights.</dc:description>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Penegakan hukum terhadap pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia berat di Indonesia masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan, meskipun telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan HAM. Penelitian ini menganalisis problematika tersebut melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan perbandingan dengan Afrika Selatan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kendala utama terletak pada lemahnya kemauan politik, tidak sinkronnya kerja antara Komnas HAM dan Kejaksaan Agung, budaya impunitas yang mengakar, serta hambatan pembuktian secara hukum. Akibatnya, kasus-kasus HAM berat di masa lalu tidak terselesaikan secara adil. Sebagai perbandingan, Afrika Selatan berhasil membangun model penyelesaian melalui Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi yang dapat menjadi rujukan dalam menciptakan keadilan transisional di Indonesia.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Lembaga Debat Hukum dan Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-04-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jnomokrasi/article/view/43750</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Nomokrasi; Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL NOMOKRASI; 150 - 162</dc:source>
	<dc:language>id</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jnomokrasi/article/view/43750/12936</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Nomokrasi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>