Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

KONSTITUSIONALITAS DAN PEMBATASAN KONSTITUSIONALISME KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MENGADILI PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 135/PUU-XXI/2024: LEGISLATIVE REFORM IN THE FIELD OF ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA

Perselisihan Pilkada LEGALITAS KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MENGADILI PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH: SUATU KAJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS DAN PEMBATASAN KONSTITUSIONALISME: Konstitusionalisasi Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menangani Sengketa Hasil Pilkada

Jurnal Nomokrasi · Vol. 3 No. mokrasi (2025) · pp. 262–275

Published
2025-11-30
Publisher
Lembaga Debat Hukum dan Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin
Language
id

Abstract

English

The transfer of authority to resolve disputes over the results of the Regional Elections from the Supreme Court to the Constitutional Court through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022, which is considered not in line with the provisions of Article 22E and Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution. By using normative legal research methods through laws and regulations and conceptual approaches, this study found inconsistencies in the interpretation of the constitution by the Constitutional Court. This progressive interpretation expands the meaning of the election regime beyond the original intent of the constitution, thus creating a potential legal vacuum and abuse of authority. Therefore, it is necessary to apply a more consistent interpretation and in accordance with the principles of constitutionalism to maintain legal certainty in resolving Pilkada disputes.

Bahasa Indonesia

Pada awalnya perselisihan hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah menjadi domain Mahkamah Agung, kewenangan ini berpindah, hingga Putusan MK No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 yang mengukuhkan kewenangan permanen terhadap MK. Jurisprudensi tersebut tentu bertentangan dengan Pasal 22E UUD NRI 1945. Secara yuridis, Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Terdapat inkonsistensi interpretasi konstitusi, melampaui konstruksi UUD NRI 1945 sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum (recht vacuum) dan cenderung abuse of power. Karena itu MK wajib menerapkan interpretasi konstitusional yang konsisten terhadap UUD NRI 1945 untuk menjaga kepastian hukum. Serta menerapkan kerangka paham konstitusionalisme terbatas, dengan mangacu tiga parameter utama yaitu keselarasan dengan konstruksi hukum, menjunjung prinsip konstitusi, dan perlindungan hak warga negara.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

19 authors · 62 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Laode AnhusadarInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Nur AiniInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Zairul ZairulInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Arwilda ArwildaInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Rini MuliasariInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Suharno SuharnoAffiliation unknown1
Rosye H.R. TanjungAffiliation unknown1
Supeni SufaatiAffiliation unknown1
Yayan SopianAffiliation unknown1
Totok A. MushidAffiliation unknown1
Parjan ParjanAffiliation unknown1
Eni Miton BusupAffiliation unknown1
Nelince FakdawerAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad FikriUniversitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta1
Eka Merdekawati DjafarAffiliation unknown1
Andi SagiraAffiliation unknown1
Andi BudimanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jnomokrasi/oai, first harvested 2 Nov 2026, last seen 2 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">KONSTITUSIONALITAS DAN PEMBATASAN KONSTITUSIONALISME KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MENGADILI PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 135/PUU-XXI/2024: LEGISLATIVE REFORM IN THE FIELD OF ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA</dc:title>
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Perselisihan Pilkada LEGALITAS KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MENGADILI PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH: SUATU KAJIAN KONSTITUSIONALITAS DAN PEMBATASAN KONSTITUSIONALISME: Konstitusionalisasi Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menangani Sengketa Hasil Pilkada</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">juwita, juwita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">juwita, juwita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Muslim Haq. M.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">Perselisihan Hasil Pilkada</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Konstitusionalitas</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Mahkamah Konstitusi</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Kewenangan</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The transfer of authority to resolve disputes over the results of the Regional Elections from the Supreme Court to the Constitutional Court through the Constitutional Court Decision Number 85/PUU-XX/2022, which is considered not in line with the provisions of Article 22E and Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution. By using normative legal research methods through laws and regulations and conceptual approaches, this study found inconsistencies in the interpretation of the constitution by the Constitutional Court. This progressive interpretation expands the meaning of the election regime beyond the original intent of the constitution, thus creating a potential legal vacuum and abuse of authority. Therefore, it is necessary to apply a more consistent interpretation and in accordance with the principles of constitutionalism to maintain legal certainty in resolving Pilkada disputes.</dc:description>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Pada awalnya perselisihan hasil Pemilihan Kepala Daerah menjadi domain Mahkamah Agung, kewenangan ini berpindah, hingga Putusan MK No. 85/PUU-XX/2022 yang mengukuhkan kewenangan permanen terhadap MK. Jurisprudensi tersebut tentu bertentangan dengan Pasal 22E UUD NRI 1945. Secara yuridis, Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Terdapat inkonsistensi interpretasi konstitusi, melampaui konstruksi UUD NRI 1945 sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum (recht vacuum) dan cenderung abuse of power. Karena itu MK wajib menerapkan interpretasi konstitusional yang konsisten terhadap UUD NRI 1945 untuk menjaga kepastian hukum. Serta menerapkan kerangka paham konstitusionalisme terbatas, dengan mangacu tiga parameter utama yaitu keselarasan dengan konstruksi hukum, menjunjung prinsip konstitusi, dan perlindungan hak warga negara.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Lembaga Debat Hukum dan Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jnomokrasi/article/view/45291</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Nomokrasi; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL NOMOKRASI; 262-275</dc:source>
	<dc:language>id</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jnomokrasi/article/view/45291/13782</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Nomokrasi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>