Open access
Jurnal
Assessing the Decade After: A Critical Analysis of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in the Libya Intervention
Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies · Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 32–38
ISSN 2963-1394
Published 2023-12-29
Publisher Hasanuddin University
Language en
Abstract
Currently, 12 years post-NATO intervention, Libya falls into the category of a fragile state, with worsening indices in the economic, security, and social aspects since 2011. While not a new topic, the situation in Libya in 2011 can always serve as a lesson and exemplification of the discourse on humanitarian intervention, specifically the principal aspects of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The current situation in Libya raises questions about whether there were flaws in the military intervention carried out by the NATO alliance in 2011. This paper aims to analyze the just ad bellum features related to the principal aspects within R2P were implemented in the NATO intervention in Libya. Thus, this study argues that the failure of the military intervention in Libya is due to the non-fulfillment of the basic aspects of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), especially in relation to just ad bellum, such as right authority, last resort, just cause, right intention, proportional means, and reasonable prospects in carrying out humanitarian intervention.
Collaboration network of the authors
7 authors ·
16 co-authorship links
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/hjsis/oai,
first harvested 2 Nov 2026,
last seen 2 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en">Assessing the Decade After: A Critical Analysis of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in the Libya Intervention</dc:title>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Estriani, Heavy Nala</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Libya</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">R2P</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Intervention</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Humanitarian</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Just ad bellum</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">Currently, 12 years post-NATO intervention, Libya falls into the category of a fragile state, with worsening indices in the economic, security, and social aspects since 2011. While not a new topic, the situation in Libya in 2011 can always serve as a lesson and exemplification of the discourse on humanitarian intervention, specifically the principal aspects of Responsibility to Protect (R2P). The current situation in Libya raises questions about whether there were flaws in the military intervention carried out by the NATO alliance in 2011. This paper aims to analyze the just ad bellum features related to the principal aspects within R2P were implemented in the NATO intervention in Libya. Thus, this study argues that the failure of the military intervention in Libya is due to the non-fulfillment of the basic aspects of Responsibility to Protect (R2P), especially in relation to just ad bellum, such as right authority, last resort, just cause, right intention, proportional means, and reasonable prospects in carrying out humanitarian intervention.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2023-12-29</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/hjsis/article/view/32456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.20956/hjsis.v2i1.32456</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies; Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023); 32-38</dc:source>
<dc:source>2963-1394</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.20956/hjsis.v2i1</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/hjsis/article/view/32456/11021</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2023 Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies (HJSIS)</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Not checked
Crossref
Not checked
Cite this article
APA 7
Estriani, H. N. (2023). Assessing the Decade After: A Critical Analysis of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in the Libya Intervention. Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies, 2(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.20956/hjsis.v2i1.32456
Copy
IEEE
H. N. Estriani, “Assessing the Decade After: A Critical Analysis of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in the Libya Intervention,” Hasanuddin Journal of Strategic and International Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–38, 2023, doi: 10.20956/hjsis.v2i1.32456.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.