Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Ethical Issues in Religiously Affiliated Disputes: Sant’Egidio’s Mediation in Mozambique and Algeria

Politics and Humanism · Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022) · pp. 52–65

DOI
10.31947/jph.v1i2.23770
ISSN
2962-8059, 2962-8059
Published
2022-12-26
Publisher
MAGISTER ILMU POLITIK FISIP UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

Despite its potential, the use of mediation as a conflict resolution mechanism in a religiously affiliated conflict entails a problem in terms of ethical challenges. Both religion and mediation carry its own ethical standards, where, if both collides, might jeopardizes the efficacy of mediation as conflict resolution tool. This article discusses in detail ethical challenges in mediation where religion persists in various manners. Religion might exist in the conflict (1) as the main ideologies of mediator and/or disputants, (2) as the substance being disputed and (3) in the use of religious values as peacemaking resources. Problems may arise in terms of impartiality, conflict of interest, sense of fairness and directiveness, however often it can be seen as situated concept of neutrality especially when the mediator possess profound understanding of the context. As an empirical proof, it is evident Sant’Egidio has faced problems in perception of impartiality, that affected result in both Algeria and Mozambique. This paper further suggests that appropriate pre-mediation assessment in determining the religious dynamic on the dispute is a crucial stage to tackle possible ethical problems to implement mediation in religiously affiliated conflict.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

No co-authors found in Melola yet.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jph/oai, first harvested 2 Nov 2026, last seen 2 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Ethical Issues in Religiously Affiliated Disputes: Sant’Egidio’s Mediation in Mozambique and Algeria</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Raharjo, Wahyu Arif</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">religiously affiliated dispute</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">mediation ethics</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sant’Egidio</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Mozambique</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Algeria</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Despite its potential, the use of mediation as a conflict resolution mechanism in a religiously affiliated conflict entails a problem in terms of ethical challenges. Both religion and mediation carry its own ethical standards, where, if both collides, might jeopardizes the efficacy of mediation as conflict resolution tool. This article discusses in detail ethical challenges in mediation where religion persists in various manners. Religion might exist in the conflict (1) as the main ideologies of mediator and/or disputants, (2) as the substance being disputed and (3) in the use of religious values as peacemaking resources. Problems may arise in terms of impartiality, conflict of interest, sense of fairness and directiveness, however often it can be seen as situated concept of neutrality especially when the mediator possess profound understanding of the context. As an empirical proof, it is evident Sant’Egidio has faced problems in perception of impartiality, that affected result in both Algeria and Mozambique. This paper further suggests that appropriate pre-mediation assessment in determining the religious dynamic on the dispute is a crucial stage to tackle possible ethical problems to implement mediation in religiously affiliated conflict.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">MAGISTER ILMU POLITIK FISIP UNIVERSITAS HASANUDDIN</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jph/article/view/23770</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.31947/jph.v1i2.23770</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Politics and Humanism; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022); 52-65</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Journal of Politics and Humanism; Vol 1 No 2 (2022); 52-65</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2962-8059</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2962-8059</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.31947/jph.v1i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jph/article/view/23770/9042</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Politics and Humanism</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>