Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Perbandingan Performa MSGARCH, LSTM, dan Hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM pada Peramalan Data Deret Waktu yang Mengandung Heteroskedastisitas

ESTIMASI: Journal of Statistics and Its Application · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026) · pp. 131–146

DOI
10.20956/ejsa.v7i1.45934
ISSN
2721-379X, 2721-3803
Published
2026-05-05
Publisher
Hasanuddin University
Language
en

Abstract

Volatility forecasting is crucial for estimating potential portfolio losses, particularly in cryptocurrency markets like Bitcoin, which exhibit high and irregular price fluctuations. Models from the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) family, including Markov Switching GARCH (MSGARCH), are widely used to handle heteroscedastic data and capture regime changes. Meanwhile, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is effective for modeling nonlinear and complex patterns in financial time series. This study proposes a hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM model by incorporating MSGARCH predictions as additional input to the LSTM. The model is evaluated using simulated data resembling Bitcoin's characteristics, with Heteroscedasticity Mean Absolute Error (HMAE) as the primary metric, and analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. The results identify four superior hybrid configurations, all of which significantly outperform the standalone MSGARCH and LSTM models. Based on the characteristics of Bitcoin data, the MSGARCH (2-regime with sged error distribution)-LSTM model is selected for empirical analysis. This model achieved an HMAE of 0.3197 and an HMSE of 0.2088, with accuracy improvements of 61.20% and 83.50% compared to the standalone MSGARCH model. These findings indicate that the hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM model improves volatility forecasting accuracy in highly volatile cryptocurrency markets.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

36 authors · 96 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • IPB University
  • Bandung Islamic University
  • Binus University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Anang KurniaAffiliation unknown5
Asep SaefuddinIPB University3
Aji Hamim WigenaAffiliation unknown2
Indahwati IndahwatiAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad Nur AidiAffiliation unknown2
Khairil Anwar NotodiputroBandung Islamic University2
I Made SumertajayaAffiliation unknown1
Embay RohaetiAffiliation unknown1
Sitti NurhalizaAffiliation unknown1
Abdullah PannuAffiliation unknown1
Hari WijayantoAffiliation unknown1
Utami Dyah SyafitriAffiliation unknown1
Ratna Nur Mustika SanusiAffiliation unknown1
Satria June AdwendiAffiliation unknown1
Andika Putri RatnasariAffiliation unknown1
Khusnia Nurul KhikmahAffiliation unknown1
Rahmatin Nur AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Leli LatifahAffiliation unknown1
Khalilah NurfadilahAffiliation unknown1
Khairil A. NotodiputroAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Agustin Nuriani SirodjAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Rahmalia SafitriAffiliation unknown1
Farit Mochamad AfendiAffiliation unknown1
Assyifa Lala Pratiwi HamidAffiliation unknown1
Asysta Amalia PasaribuBinus University1
Bagus SartonoIPB University1
Anwar FitriantoAffiliation unknown1
Lukmanul HakimAffiliation unknown1
Nurhidayah NurhidayahUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Ade RiyawanAffiliation unknown1
Logananta Puja KusumaAffiliation unknown1
Agus Mohamad SolehIPB University1
Uswatun HasanahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/ESTIMASI/oai, first harvested 2 Nov 2026, last seen 2 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Perbandingan Performa MSGARCH, LSTM, dan Hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM pada Peramalan Data Deret Waktu yang Mengandung Heteroskedastisitas</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Freya, Wa Ode Rona</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sadik, Kusman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Susetyo, Budi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Time Series</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Volatility</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">MSGARCH</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">LSTM</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Data Simulation</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Bitcoin</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Volatility forecasting is crucial for estimating potential portfolio losses, particularly in cryptocurrency markets like Bitcoin, which exhibit high and irregular price fluctuations. Models from the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) family, including Markov Switching GARCH (MSGARCH), are widely used to handle heteroscedastic data and capture regime changes. Meanwhile, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is effective for modeling nonlinear and complex patterns in financial time series. This study proposes a hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM model by incorporating MSGARCH predictions as additional input to the LSTM. The model is evaluated using simulated data resembling Bitcoin's characteristics, with Heteroscedasticity Mean Absolute Error (HMAE) as the primary metric, and analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. The results identify four superior hybrid configurations, all of which significantly outperform the standalone MSGARCH and LSTM models. Based on the characteristics of Bitcoin data, the MSGARCH (2-regime with sged error distribution)-LSTM model is selected for empirical analysis. This model achieved an HMAE of 0.3197 and an HMSE of 0.2088, with accuracy improvements of 61.20% and 83.50% compared to the standalone MSGARCH model. These findings indicate that the hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM model improves volatility forecasting accuracy in highly volatile cryptocurrency markets.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-05-05</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/ESTIMASI/article/view/45934</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20956/ejsa.v7i1.45934</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">ESTIMASI: Journal of Statistics and Its Application; Vol. 7, No. 1, Januari, 2026 : Estimasi; 131-146</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-379X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-3803</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/ESTIMASI/article/view/45934/14386</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>