Open access Jurnal SINTA 2
Analisis Persepsi Mahasiswa Rumpun Ilmu Komputer Terhadap Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence Dalam Penulisan Tugas Akhir
Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer (JTIIK) · Vol. 12 No. 4 (2025) · pp. 829–842
- ISSN
- 2528-6579, 2355-7699
- Published
- 2025-08-29
- Publisher
- Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya
- Language
- id
Abstract
Bahasa Indonesia
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi dan penggunaan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) dalam penulisan tugas akhir di kalangan mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, data dikumpulkan dari 102 mahasiswa tingkat akhir melalui kuesioner berbasis skala Likert. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dengan pendekatan Partial Least Squares (PLS). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi kegunaan (perceived usefulness) memiliki pengaruh signifikan positif terhadap penggunaan aktual (actual usage) AI, sedangkan persepsi kemudahan penggunaan (perceived ease of use) tidak menunjukkan pengaruh yang signifikan. Mayoritas responden melaporkan bahwa AI membantu meningkatkan kualitas tugas akhir dan kreativitas mereka, serta dianggap mudah diakses dan fleksibel dalam penggunaannya. ChatGPT teridentifikasi sebagai aplikasi AI yang paling dominan digunakan. Penelitian ini juga mengidentifikasi beberapa hambatan dalam penggunaan AI, termasuk kebutuhan akan fitur yang lebih spesifik untuk mendukung penulisan akademik. Temuan ini memberikan wawasan penting bagi pengembang teknologi dan institusi pendidikan dalam mengoptimalkan penggunaan AI untuk mendukung proses penulisan akademik. Penelitian lanjutan direkomendasikan untuk mengeksplorasi aspek orisinalitas dan akurasi tulisan yang dibantu AI. Abstract This study aims to analyze the perception and usage of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in thesis writing among students of the Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 102 final-year students through a Likert-scale-based questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach. The results of the study indicate that perceived usefulness has a significant positive influence on the actual usage of AI, while perceived ease of use does not show a significant effect. The majority of respondents reported that AI helps improve the quality of their theses and their creativity, and it is considered easy to access and flexible in its usage. ChatGPT was identified as the most dominant AI application used. The study also identified several barriers to AI usage, including the need for more specific features to support academic writing. These findings provide important insights for technology developers and educational institutions in optimizing the use of AI to support academic writing processes. Further research is recommended to explore aspects of originality and accuracy in AI-assisted writing.
English
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi dan penggunaan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) dalam penulisan tugas akhir di kalangan mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Brawijaya. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, data dikumpulkan dari 102 mahasiswa tingkat akhir melalui kuesioner berbasis skala Likert. Analisis data dilakukan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) dengan pendekatan Partial Least Squares (PLS). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi kegunaan (perceived usefulness) memiliki pengaruh signifikan positif terhadap penggunaan aktual (actual usage) AI, sedangkan persepsi kemudahan penggunaan (perceived ease of use) tidak menunjukkan pengaruh yang signifikan. Mayoritas responden melaporkan bahwa AI membantu meningkatkan kualitas tugas akhir dan kreativitas mereka, serta dianggap mudah diakses dan fleksibel dalam penggunaannya. ChatGPT teridentifikasi sebagai aplikasi AI yang paling dominan digunakan. Penelitian ini juga mengidentifikasi beberapa hambatan dalam penggunaan AI, termasuk kebutuhan akan fitur yang lebih spesifik untuk mendukung penulisan akademik. Temuan ini memberikan wawasan penting bagi pengembang teknologi dan institusi pendidikan dalam mengoptimalkan penggunaan AI untuk mendukung proses penulisan akademik. Penelitian lanjutan direkomendasikan untuk mengeksplorasi aspek orisinalitas dan akurasi tulisan yang dibantu AI. Abstract This study aims to analyze the perception and usage of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in thesis writing among students of the Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Brawijaya. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected from 102 final-year students through a Likert-scale-based questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach. The results of the study indicate that perceived usefulness has a significant positive influence on the actual usage of AI, while perceived ease of use does not show a significant effect. The majority of respondents reported that AI helps improve the quality of their theses and their creativity, and it is considered easy to access and flexible in its usage. ChatGPT was identified as the most dominant AI application used. The study also identified several barriers to AI usage, including the need for more specific features to support academic writing. These findings provide important insights for technology developers and educational institutions in optimizing the use of AI to support academic writing processes. Further research is recommended to explore aspects of originality and accuracy in AI-assisted writing.
Keywords
Collaboration network of the authors
20 authors · 42 co-authorship links
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
- University of Brawijaya
- Affiliation unknown
- Different organisations
- Same organisation
- Affiliation unknown
- Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
| Co-author | Organisation | Joint articles |
|---|---|---|
| Admaja Dwi Herlambang | University of Brawijaya | 3 |
| Satrio Hadi Wijoyo | University of Brawijaya | 2 |
| Fitra Abdurrachman Bachtiar | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Fajar Pradana | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Kartika Utami | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Rahmana Ilmi Hakim | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Nurur Rohmah | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Cindy Felita Nur Alimah | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Azri Putri Rahmatika | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Dinar Indah Dwi Utami | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Safira Widya Hapsari | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Muhammad Rosyid Mubarok | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Yusi Tyroni Mursityo | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Audi Kresna Fathurino | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Muhammad Naufal Pratama | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
| Andi Reza Perdanakusuma | University of Brawijaya | 1 |
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.