Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

The Effect of Speakmate Toward Students’ Speaking Perfomance at English Department of Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University

ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) · pp. 204–210

DOI
10.34050/elsjish.v4i2.14210
ISSN
2621-0835, 2621-0843
Published
2021-06-23
Publisher
Hasanuddin University
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

The problem in this research are: Does speakmate influence students speaking performance at English Department, and how is students’ self-confidence of having speakmate on students’ speaking performance. This research aims to know the effect of speakmate on students’ speaking performance and know students’ self-confidence to speak mate. This research was a quantitative approach by applying experimental method of quasi-experimental design. The population was all of eight-semester college students, class C and class D who enrolled in academic year 2017/2018. The sample was taken by the. The researcher used purposive sampling, 10 students in experimental group and 10 students in the control group. The intrument used in this research was pretest and posttest in experimental group and control group in the form of speaking test. The finding indicated that the mean score of paired students with their speakmate of the experimental group in pretest is 60.66 in moderate category and the mean score in posttest is 77.33 in the good category. while in the control group, the mean score in pretest is 60.66 in moderate category an the mean score in posttest is 64.66 in the moderate category. The result of hypothesis analysis indicated that tcount is 2.905 is more significant than t-table is 2.101. it means that Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted. Based on the calculation of the t-test above, it can be concluded that speakmate influence students speaking performance. Majority of students show their agreements that speakmate influence students’ speaking performance.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

38 authors · 79 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nasmilah NasmilahAffiliation unknown6
Ria JubhariAffiliation unknown2
Abdul Hakim YassiAffiliation unknown2
Lela Rahmawati .Affiliation unknown2
La Ode Ba’aUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Muhammad Amrullah PagalaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Hamzah A MachmoedAffiliation unknown1
Zainudin Abdussamad AbdussamadAffiliation unknown1
Harlina SahibAffiliation unknown1
Hafirah PatangAffiliation unknown1
Hamzah MachmoedAffiliation unknown1
Fikratul KhairiyahAffiliation unknown1
Sukmawaty SukmawatyAffiliation unknown1
FismaAffiliation unknown1
Rahmat JAffiliation unknown1
Sitti SahraenyAffiliation unknown1
DarmayantyAffiliation unknown1
SukmawatyAffiliation unknown1
Nadirah MahasengAffiliation unknown1
Marleiny RadjuniAffiliation unknown1
Noer Jihad SalehAffiliation unknown1
Zulfahmi IrwanAffiliation unknown1
Achmad Taqlidul Chair FachruddinAffiliation unknown1
Sulfaedah LestariAffiliation unknown1
AbidinAffiliation unknown1
Indah Yuliana MuhtarAffiliation unknown1
M. Amir PAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Dian Permata SariAffiliation unknown1
Sita LarasatiAffiliation unknown1
Tria AliAffiliation unknown1
Ananda RahmadanaAffiliation unknown1
Indah MaharaniAffiliation unknown1
Andi SarwindahAffiliation unknown1
Andi Inayah SorayaAffiliation unknown1
Bunga TunruAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/oai, first harvested 3 Nov 2026, last seen 3 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Effect of Speakmate Toward Students’ Speaking Perfomance at English  Department of Dayanu Ikhsanuddin University</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yunus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Abidin Pammu</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Nasmilah</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Speak Mate</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Speaking Performance</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Students</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">The problem in this research are: Does speakmate influence students speaking performance at English Department, and how is students’ self-confidence of having speakmate on students’ speaking performance. This research aims to know the effect of speakmate on students’ speaking performance and know students’ self-confidence to speak mate. This research was a quantitative approach by applying experimental method of quasi-experimental design. The population was all of eight-semester college students , class C and class D who enrolled in academic year 2017/2018. The sample was taken by the. The researcher used purposive sampling, 10 students in experimental group and 10 students in the control group. The intrument used in this research was pretest and posttest in experimental group and control group in the form of speaking test. The finding indicated that the mean score of paired students with their speakmate of the experimental group in pretest is 60.66 in moderate category and the mean score in posttest is 77.33 in the good category. while in the control group, the mean score in pretest is 60.66 in moderate category an the mean score in posttest is 64.66 in the moderate category. The result of hypothesis analysis indicated that tcount is 2.905 is more significant than t-table is 2.101. it means that Ho is rejected and H1 is accepted. Based on the calculation of the t-test above, it can be concluded that speakmate influence students speaking performance. Majority of students show their agreements that speakmate influence students’ speaking performance.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-06-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/article/view/14210</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.34050/elsjish.v4i2.14210</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities; Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): JUNE; 204-210</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2621-0835</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2621-0843</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/article/view/14210/6913</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2021 Yunus, Abidin Pammu, Nasmilah</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>