Open access
Jurnal
An Analysis of Cognitive Level in Reading Questions of English Textbook for Vocational High School
ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 38–44
ISSN 2621-0835, 2621-0843
Published 2023-03-27
Publisher Hasanuddin University
Language en
Abstract
The paper intends to analyze the cognitive level of questions from the text in the English Textbook. The researchers examined the cognitive level of the reading questions and the most dominant level in this book based on the levels of the revised edition of Bloom's Taxonomy. Because the information gathered was verbal, this study can be classified as a qualitative descriptive. The researchers used the textbook "Look Ahead Book 1 An English Course" as a data source and uses a checklist table in collecting and analyzing data to find research results. The researcher analyzes the questions in an English textbook, but only focuses on questions from the text in the chapter with narrative text. After doing the research, there are 2 chapters containing narrative text questions and there are 61 questions that are studied.The results showed that the level of questions in the book "Look Ahead Book 1 An English Course" only contains 5 levels, namely Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, and Evaluating, which from the research results found the percentage of each level is 11, 48% for the Remembering level, 16.39% for the Understanding level, 1.64% for the Applying level, 47.54% for the Analyzing level and 22.95% for the Evaluating level. Hence, In terms of Bloom's taxonomy, the Analyzing level is the most prevalent here, making up 47.54 percent of the text.
Collaboration network of the authors
6 authors ·
9 co-authorship links
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/oai,
first harvested 3 Nov 2026,
last seen 3 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en">An Analysis of Cognitive Level in Reading Questions of English Textbook for Vocational High School</dc:title>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Putri, Andi Mega Januarti </dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rafiqa, Rafiqa</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Apriawan, Ainun </dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Cognitive Level</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">English Textbook</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Revised Bloom's Taxonomy</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">The paper intends to analyze the cognitive level of questions from the text in the English Textbook. The researchers examined the cognitive level of the reading questions and the most dominant level in this book based on the levels of the revised edition of Bloom's Taxonomy. Because the information gathered was verbal, this study can be classified as a qualitative descriptive. The researchers used the textbook "Look Ahead Book 1 An English Course" as a data source and uses a checklist table in collecting and analyzing data to find research results. The researcher analyzes the questions in an English textbook, but only focuses on questions from the text in the chapter with narrative text. After doing the research, there are 2 chapters containing narrative text questions and there are 61 questions that are studied.The results showed that the level of questions in the book "Look Ahead Book 1 An English Course" only contains 5 levels, namely Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, and Evaluating, which from the research results found the percentage of each level is 11, 48% for the Remembering level, 16.39% for the Understanding level, 1.64% for the Applying level, 47.54% for the Analyzing level and 22.95% for the Evaluating level. Hence, In terms of Bloom's taxonomy, the Analyzing level is the most prevalent here, making up 47.54 percent of the text.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2023-03-27</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/article/view/25225</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.34050/elsjish.v6i1.25225</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en">ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): March; 38-44</dc:source>
<dc:source>2621-0835</dc:source>
<dc:source>2621-0843</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.34050/elsjish.v6i1</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/article/view/25225/9512</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2023 Andi Mega Januarti Putri, Rafiqa Rafiqa, Ainun Apriawan</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Not checked
Crossref
Not checked
Cite this article
APA 7
Putri, A. M. J., Rafiqa, R., & Apriawan, A. (2023). An Analysis of Cognitive Level in Reading Questions of English Textbook for Vocational High School. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 6(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v6i1.25225
Copy
IEEE
A. M. J. Putri, R. Rafiqa, and A. Apriawan, “An Analysis of Cognitive Level in Reading Questions of English Textbook for Vocational High School,” ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2023, doi: 10.34050/elsjish.v6i1.25225.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.