Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal

Cohesion and Coherence in EFL Academic Writing: A Case Study of Tadulako University

ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) · pp. 749–758

DOI
10.34050/els-jish.v8i2.45245
ISSN
2621-0835, 2621-0843
Published
2025-07-01
Publisher
Hasanuddin University
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Cohesion and coherence are essential components in academic writing which bridge an academia to create logically organized text and easy to comprehend. Thus, this research aims to identify the use of cohesion and coherence devices in the background section of Skripsi written by students of the English Education Study Program of Tadulako University. This research employs a mixed-method, which involves quantitative and qualitative analysis. The data were taken from ten selected Skripsi backgrounds. The findings of this research present that the most frequently used of cohesive devices is reiteration (48.09%), followed by reference (32.20%), and conjunction 1(9.49%). In contrast, the least frequently used cohesive devices are substitution and ellipsis, each appearing only (0.11%). Furthermore, in terms of coherence, the students dominantly implement repeat key nouns (66.27%), followed by consistent pronouns (22.88%), transition signals (8.88%), and logical order (1.97%). Although some devices appeared less frequently, the students’ academic writing still achieved overall textual unity and logical flow. Therefore, these findings indicate that while students have good abilities to build cohesion and coherence in their writing, there remains need to encourage more varied use of devices, particularly substitution, ellipsis, and transition signal, in order to further improve their quality of academic writing.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

37 authors · 95 co-authorship links · 5 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Poltekkes Kemenkes Kendari
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Anjar Kusuma DewiAffiliation unknown2
Maghfira MaghfiraAffiliation unknown2
Syaifudin Suhri KasimUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Rosnah RosnahPoltekkes Kemenkes Kendari1
Purnomo LeksonoPoltekkes Kemenkes Kendari1
Imanuddin ImanuddinPoltekkes Kemenkes Kendari1
Teguh FaturrahmanPoltekkes Kemenkes Kendari1
Jamaluddin JamaluddinAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Sitti MusninaAffiliation unknown1
Yonelian YuyunAffiliation unknown1
M. Sulaiman ZubairAffiliation unknown1
Ritha PratiwiAffiliation unknown1
Putri AndiniAffiliation unknown1
Maf'ulah Maf'ulahAffiliation unknown1
Nur Sehang ThamrinAffiliation unknown1
Abdul KamaruddinAffiliation unknown1
Mochtar MarhumAffiliation unknown1
Athiya FatinRafifahAffiliation unknown1
Aminah AminahAffiliation unknown1
Nabila Khalifatul JannahAffiliation unknown1
Trivani TrivaniAffiliation unknown1
Mashuri MashuriAffiliation unknown1
Sriati UsmanAffiliation unknown1
Sindi KlodiaAffiliation unknown1
Jamiluddin JamiluddinAffiliation unknown1
Selviana H Selviana HAffiliation unknown1
Mukrim MukrimAffiliation unknown1
Mawardin M. SaidAffiliation unknown1
Pelangi Putri RahayuAffiliation unknown1
Konder ManurungAffiliation unknown1
Zarkiani HasyimAffiliation unknown1
Fathira QalbinaAffiliation unknown1
Indah Farawansa Moh.S.MahidAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/oai, first harvested 3 Nov 2026, last seen 3 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Cohesion and Coherence in EFL Academic Writing: A Case Study of Tadulako University</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Ismi, Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Anggreni, Afrillia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Budi, Budi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Rofiqoh, Rofiqoh</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Cohesion</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Coherence</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Skripsi background</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Cohesion and coherence are essential components in academic writing which bridge an academia to create logically organized text and easy to comprehend. Thus, this research aims to identify the use of cohesion and coherence devices in the background section of Skripsi written by students of the English Education Study Program of Tadulako University. This research employs a mixed-method, which involves quantitative and qualitative analysis. The data were taken from ten selected Skripsi backgrounds. The findings of this research present that the most frequently used of cohesive devices is reiteration (48.09%), followed by reference (32.20%), and conjunction 1(9.49%). In contrast, the least frequently used cohesive devices are substitution and ellipsis, each appearing only (0.11%). Furthermore, in terms of coherence, the students dominantly implement repeat key nouns (66.27%), followed by consistent pronouns (22.88%), transition signals (8.88%), and logical order (1.97%). Although some devices appeared less frequently, the students’ academic writing still achieved overall textual unity and logical flow. Therefore, these findings indicate that while students have good abilities to build cohesion and coherence in their writing, there remains need to encourage more varied use of devices, particularly substitution, ellipsis, and transition signal, in order to further improve their quality of academic writing.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-07-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/article/view/45245</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.34050/els-jish.v8i2.45245</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities; Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): JUNE; 749-758</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2621-0835</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2621-0843</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.34050/els-jish.v8i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jish/article/view/45245/13073</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 Nurul Ismi, Afrillia Anggreni, Budi, Rofiqoh</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>