Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 3

THE PROMINENCE OF VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL IN MULTIVARIATE TIME SERIES FORECASTING MODELS WITH STATIONARY PROBLEMS

BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan · Vol. 16 No. 4 (2022) · pp. 1313–1324

DOI
10.30598/barekengvol16iss4pp1313-1324
ISSN
2615-3017, 1978-7227
Published
2022-12-15
Publisher
PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

One of the problems in modelling multivariate time series is stationary. Stationary test results do not always produce all stationary variables; mixed stationary and non-stationary variables are possible. When stationary problems are found in multivariate time series modelling, it is necessary to evaluate the model's performance in various stationary conditions to obtain the best forecasting model. This study aims to get a superior multivariate time series forecasting model based on the goodness of the model in various stationary conditions. In this study, the evaluation of the model's performance through simulation data modelling is then applied to the actual data with a stationary problem, namely Bogor City inflation data. The best model in simulation modelling is based on the stability of RMSE and MAD in 100 replications. The results are that the VAR model is the best in various stationary conditions. Meanwhile, the best model on actual data modelling is based on evaluation in 4 folds for model fitting power and model forecasting power. The Bogor City inflation data modelling with the mixed stationary problem resulted in the best model, namely the VAR(1) model. This means the VAR model is good enough to be used as a forecasting model in mixed stationary conditions. Thus, in this study, based on the goodness of the model in two modelling scenarios in various stationary conditions, overall, it was found that the VAR model was superior to the VARD and VECM models.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 114 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • IPB University
  • Bandung Islamic University
  • Binus University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Anang KurniaAffiliation unknown6
Anwar FitriantoAffiliation unknown3
Asep SaefuddinIPB University3
Indahwati IndahwatiAffiliation unknown3
Farit Mochamad AfendiAffiliation unknown2
Anik DjuraidahAffiliation unknown2
Faula ArinaAffiliation unknown2
Utami SyafitriAffiliation unknown2
Khairil Anwar NotodiputroBandung Islamic University2
Bagus SartonoIPB University2
Zein Rizky SantosoAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Rona FreyaAffiliation unknown1
Budi SusetyoAffiliation unknown1
Ismah IsmahAffiliation unknown1
Ani AndriyatiAffiliation unknown1
Isti KamilaAffiliation unknown1
Anggita Rizky FadilahAffiliation unknown1
Sitti NurhalizaAffiliation unknown1
Wiwik Andriyani Lestari NingsihAffiliation unknown1
Nindi PigithaAffiliation unknown1
Hari WijayantoAffiliation unknown1
Fathu NurrahmanAffiliation unknown1
Nunung NurjanahAffiliation unknown1
Khusnia Nurul KhikmahAffiliation unknown1
Rahmatin Nur AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Leli LatifahAffiliation unknown1
Titin YuniartyAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Agustin Nuriani SirodjAffiliation unknown1
Agus Sofian Eka HidayatAffiliation unknown1
Dian KusumaningrumAffiliation unknown1
Nur HikmahAffiliation unknown1
I'lmisukma RisnawatiAffiliation unknown1
Asysta Amalia PasaribuBinus University1
Lukmanul HakimAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Nur AidiAffiliation unknown1
Alona DwinataAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE PROMINENCE OF VECTOR AUTOREGRESSIVE MODEL IN MULTIVARIATE TIME SERIES FORECASTING MODELS WITH STATIONARY PROBLEMS</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rohaeti, Embay</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sumertajaya, I Made</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wigena, Aji Hamim</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sadik, Kusman</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">One of the problems in modelling multivariate time series is stationary. Stationary test results do not always produce all stationary variables; mixed stationary and non-stationary variables are possible. When stationary problems are found in multivariate time series modelling, it is necessary to evaluate the model's performance in various stationary conditions to obtain the best forecasting model. This study aims to get a superior multivariate time series forecasting model based on the goodness of the model in various stationary conditions. In this study, the evaluation of the model's performance through simulation data modelling is then applied to the actual data with a stationary problem, namely Bogor City inflation data. The best model in simulation modelling is based on the stability of RMSE and MAD in 100 replications. The results are that the VAR model is the best in various stationary conditions. Meanwhile, the best model on actual data modelling is based on evaluation in 4 folds for model fitting power and model forecasting power. The Bogor City inflation data modelling with the mixed stationary problem resulted in the best model, namely the VAR(1) model. This means the VAR model is good enough to be used as a forecasting model in mixed stationary conditions. Thus, in this study, based on the goodness of the model in two modelling scenarios in various stationary conditions, overall, it was found that the VAR model was superior to the VARD and VECM models. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/6293</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.30598/barekengvol16iss4pp1313-1324</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan; Vol 16 No 4 (2022): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Applications; 1313-1324</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-3017</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-7227</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.30598/barekengvol16iss4year2022</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/6293/5147</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Embay Rohaeti, I Made Sumertajaya, Aji Hamim Wigena, Kusman Sadik</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>