The growth of electronic payment usage makes the monetary tension of credit-card deception is changing into major defiance for finance and technology companies. Therefore, pressuring them to continuously advance their fraud detection system is crucial. In this research, we describe fraud detection as a classification issue by comparing three methods. The method used is Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Random Forest, and Binary Logistic Regression. The dataset used is a dataset containing transactions made by credit cards. The challenge in this analysis is that the dataset is highly unbalanced, so SMOTE must perform better on the data. The dataset contains only continuous features that are transformed into Principal Component Scores (PCs). The results show that the binary regression algorithm, the Random Forest algorithm, and the Linear Discriminant Analysis with variables that have SMOTE have AUC values greater than using the original variables. The largest AUC value was obtained by binary logistic regression with 90:10 separation data and Random Forest Algorithm with 60:40 separation data.
Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis
17 penulis ·
30 tautan kepenulisan bersama
· 2 lintas organisasi
Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.
Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
Universitas Pattimura
Organisasi berbeda
Organisasi sama
Afiliasi tidak diketahui
Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.