Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 3

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TIME SERIES FORECASTING MODELS USING ARIMA AND NEURAL NETWORK AUTOREGRESSION METHODS

BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan · Vol. 18 No. 4 (2024) · hlm. 2563–2576

DOI
10.30598/barekengvol18iss4pp2563-2576
ISSN
2615-3017, 1978-7227
Terbit
2024-10-14
Penerbit
PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Gold price fluctuations have a significant impact because gold is a haven asset. When financial markets are volatile, investors tend to turn to safer instruments such as gold, so gold price forecasting becomes important in economic uncertainty. The novelty of this research is the comparative analysis of time series forecasting models using ARIMA and the NNAR methods to predict gold price movements specifically applied to gold price data with non-stationary and non-linear characteristics. The aim is to identify the strengths and limitations of ARIMA and NNAR on such data. ARIMA can only be applied to time series data that are already stationary or have been converted to stationary form through differentiation. However, ARIMA may struggle to capture complex non-linear patterns in non-stationary data. Instead, NNAR can handle non-stationary data more effectively by modeling the complex non-linear relationships between input and output variables. In the NNAR model, the lag values of the time series are used as input variables for the neural network. The dataset used is the closing price of gold with 1449 periods from January 2, 2018, to October 5, 2023. The augmented Dickey-Fuller test dataset obtained a p-value = 0.6746, meaning the data is not stationary. The ARIMA(1, 1, 1) model was selected as the gold price forecasting model and outperformed other candidate ARIMA models based on parameter identification and model diagnosis tests. Model performance is evaluated based on the RMSE and MAE values. In this study, the ARIMA(1, 1, 1) model obtained RMSE = 16.20431 and MAE = 11.13958. The NNAR(1, 10) model produces RMSE = 16.10002 and MAE = 11.09360. Based on the RMSE and MAE values, the NNAR(1, 10) model produces better accuracy than the ARIMA(1, 1, 1) model.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

18 penulis · 53 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Yulison Herry ChrisnantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Asep ID HadianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Amelia AmeliaAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Fitra MulyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitra MulianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Azizah AzizahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sena AriesandyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ema CarniaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Riska Novita SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Riezky Purnama SariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TIME SERIES FORECASTING MODELS USING ARIMA AND NEURAL NETWORK AUTOREGRESSION METHODS</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Melina, Melina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sukono, Sukono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Napitupulu, Herlina</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mohamed, Norizan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Chrisnanto, Yulison Herry</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hadiana, Asep ID</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kusumaningtyas, Valentina Adimurti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nabilla, Ulya</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Gold price fluctuations have a significant impact because gold is a haven asset. When financial markets are volatile, investors tend to turn to safer instruments such as gold, so gold price forecasting becomes important in economic uncertainty. The novelty of this research is the comparative analysis of time series forecasting models using ARIMA and the NNAR methods to predict gold price movements specifically applied to gold price data with non-stationary and non-linear characteristics. The aim is to identify the strengths and limitations of ARIMA and NNAR on such data. ARIMA can only be applied to time series data that are already stationary or have been converted to stationary form through differentiation. However, ARIMA may struggle to capture complex non-linear patterns in non-stationary data. Instead, NNAR can handle non-stationary data more effectively by modeling the complex non-linear relationships between input and output variables. In the NNAR model, the lag values of the time series are used as input variables for the neural network. The dataset used is the closing price of gold with 1449 periods from January 2, 2018, to October 5, 2023. The augmented Dickey-Fuller test dataset obtained a p-value = 0.6746, meaning the data is not stationary. The ARIMA(1, 1, 1) model was selected as the gold price forecasting model and outperformed other candidate ARIMA models based on parameter identification and model diagnosis tests. Model performance is evaluated based on the RMSE and MAE values. In this study, the ARIMA(1, 1, 1) model obtained RMSE = 16.20431 and MAE = 11.13958. The NNAR(1, 10) model produces RMSE = 16.10002 and MAE = 11.09360. Based on the RMSE and MAE values, the NNAR(1, 10) model produces better accuracy than the ARIMA(1, 1, 1) model.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-10-14</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/13128</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.30598/barekengvol18iss4pp2563-2576</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan; Vol 18 No 4 (2024): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application; 2563-2576</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-3017</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-7227</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.30598/barekengvol18iss4year2024</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/13128/8877</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2024 Melina Melina, Sukono Sukono, Herlina Napitupulu, Norizan Mohamed, Yulison Herry Chrisnanto, Asep ID Hadiana, Valentina Adimurti Kusumaningtyas, Ulya Nabilla</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>