Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 3

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN CLASSIFYING THE QUALITY OF PALU SHALLOTS

BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan · Vol. 19 No. 3 (2025) · pp. 1853–1864

DOI
10.30598/barekengvol19iss3pp1853-1864
ISSN
2615-3017, 1978-7227
Published
2025-07-01
Publisher
PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of various machine learning methods for classifying the quality of Palu shallots based on the Indonesian National Standard (SNI). The dataset consists of 1,500 samples of Palu shallots, each characterized by 10 key features, including size, color, texture, and moisture content. Five machine learning models—Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression—were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score as performance metrics. The results indicate that Random Forest achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 95.4%, followed by Decision Tree (90.7%) and SVM (90.2%). Random Forest also excelled in precision (93.6%) and F1 Score (93.5%), making it the most reliable model for shallot quality classification. Meanwhile, SVM demonstrated a good balance between recall and precision, making it a strong alternative. Implementing machine learning models has the potential to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of agricultural product quality assurance. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for farmers, agribusiness practitioners, and researchers adopting artificial intelligence technology for more precise and efficient agricultural quality assessment.

Collaboration network of the authors

7 authors · 12 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hendra MesraHasanuddin University1
. HendraAffiliation unknown1
Jeffry KusumaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MACHINE LEARNING METHODS IN CLASSIFYING THE QUALITY OF PALU SHALLOTS</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Lusiyanti, Desy</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Musdalifah, Selvy</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sahari, Agusman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fajri, Iman Al</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study conducts a comparative analysis of various machine learning methods for classifying the quality of Palu shallots based on the Indonesian National Standard (SNI). The dataset consists of 1,500 samples of Palu shallots, each characterized by 10 key features, including size, color, texture, and moisture content. Five machine learning models—Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression—were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score as performance metrics. The results indicate that Random Forest achieved the best performance with an accuracy of 95.4%, followed by Decision Tree (90.7%) and SVM (90.2%). Random Forest also excelled in precision (93.6%) and F1 Score (93.5%), making it the most reliable model for shallot quality classification. Meanwhile, SVM demonstrated a good balance between recall and precision, making it a strong alternative. Implementing machine learning models has the potential to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of agricultural product quality assurance. The findings of this study provide valuable insights for farmers, agribusiness practitioners, and researchers adopting artificial intelligence technology for more precise and efficient agricultural quality assessment.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2025-07-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/15965</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.30598/barekengvol19iss3pp1853-1864</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan; Vol 19 No 3 (2025): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application; 1853-1864</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-3017</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-7227</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.30598/barekengvol19iss3year2025</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/15965/10703</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2025 Desy Lusiyanti, Selvy Musdalifah, Agusman Sahari, Iman Al Fajri</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>