Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 3

COMPARING STATISTICAL AND DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR INSURANCE CLAIM ESTIMATION: A CASE STUDY OF HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL (HMM) AND CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK - LONG SHORTTERM MEMORY (CNN-LSTM)

BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan · Vol. 20 No. 4 (2026) · pp. 2711–2726

DOI
10.30598/barekengvol20iss4pp2711-2726
ISSN
2615-3017, 1978-7227
Published
2026-08-24
Publisher
PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The insurance industry relies heavily on accurate claim prediction to support risk management, reserve allocation, and financial stability. However, motor vehicle insurance claim data are typically characterized by temporal dependency, highly skewed distributions, and fluctuating claim severity, making accurate prediction a challenging task. While deep learning approaches have recently gained attention for time-series forecasting, their effectiveness on moderate-scale insurance claim datasets remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the predictive performance of the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and CNN-LSTM in modelling temporal patterns and predicting daily motor vehicle insurance claims. In addition, an Attention-LSTM + XGBoost ensemble model is included as a supplementary deep learning benchmark. This study utilizes historical motor vehicle insurance claim data collected from 2017 to 2021, consisting of 11,679 claim observations. The data preprocessing stage included data cleaning, missing value handling, outlier detection, and claim severity categorization for HMM modelling. The HMM parameters were estimated using the Baum–Welch algorithm, while the deep learning models were trained using sequential claim data. Model performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R^2) on the testing dataset to ensure objective comparison. The experimental results show that the HMM model achieved the best predictive performance, outperforming both the CNN-LSTM and Attention-LSTM + XGBoost models. The findings indicate that the probabilistic structure of HMM is more suitable for modelling the temporal risk patterns and fluctuating claim behavior observed in the motor vehicle insurance dataset. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that classical probabilistic models can remain competitive and even outperform more complex deep learning approaches when applied to moderately sized insurance claim datasets with limited hidden complexity.

Collaboration network of the authors

23 authors · 62 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
A. Muh. Amil SiddikAffiliation unknown2
Andi Muhammad Amil SiddikAffiliation unknown2
Edy Saputra RusdiAffiliation unknown1
Naimah ArisAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Ardiansyah AsrifahAffiliation unknown1
Nur Hilal A. SyahrirAffiliation unknown1
Aidawayati RangkutiAffiliation unknown1
Wahyudi RusdiAffiliation unknown1
Nur Hilal A. SyahrirAffiliation unknown1
Syamsuddin ToahaAffiliation unknown1
Irawati IrawatiAffiliation unknown1
Hanni GarminiaAffiliation unknown1
Amir Kamal AmirAffiliation unknown1
Jeki SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Ainun Mawaddah AbdalAffiliation unknown1
Annisa Utami IslamiAffiliation unknown1
Farah Diba SafriadiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">COMPARING STATISTICAL AND DEEP LEARNING METHODS FOR INSURANCE CLAIM ESTIMATION: A CASE STUDY OF HIDDEN MARKOV MODEL (HMM) AND CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK - LONG SHORTTERM MEMORY (CNN-LSTM)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Mawaddah Abdal, Ainun</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Anwar, Andi Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wynnie, Illuminata</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Siddik, Amil</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rusdi, Edy Saputra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mauliddin, Mauliddin</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The insurance industry relies heavily on accurate claim prediction to support risk management, reserve allocation, and financial stability. However, motor vehicle insurance claim data are typically characterized by temporal dependency, highly skewed distributions, and fluctuating claim severity, making accurate prediction a challenging task. While deep learning approaches have recently gained attention for time-series forecasting, their effectiveness on moderate-scale insurance claim datasets remains uncertain. This study aims to compare the predictive performance of the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and CNN-LSTM in modelling temporal patterns and predicting daily motor vehicle insurance claims. In addition, an Attention-LSTM + XGBoost ensemble model is included as a supplementary deep learning benchmark. This study utilizes historical motor vehicle insurance claim data collected from 2017 to 2021, consisting of 11,679 claim observations. The data preprocessing stage included data cleaning, missing value handling, outlier detection, and claim severity categorization for HMM modelling. The HMM parameters were estimated using the Baum–Welch algorithm, while the deep learning models were trained using sequential claim data. Model performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R^2) on the testing dataset to ensure objective comparison. The experimental results show that the HMM model achieved the best predictive performance, outperforming both the CNN-LSTM and Attention-LSTM + XGBoost models. The findings indicate that the probabilistic structure of HMM is more suitable for modelling the temporal risk patterns and fluctuating claim behavior observed in the motor vehicle insurance dataset. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that classical probabilistic models can remain competitive and even outperform more complex deep learning approaches when applied to moderately sized insurance claim datasets with limited hidden complexity.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/21255</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.30598/barekengvol20iss4pp2711-2726</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan; Vol 20 No 4 (2026): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application; 2711-2726</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-3017</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-7227</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.30598/barekengvol20iss4year2026</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/21255/13168</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Ainun Mawaddah Abdal, Andi Muhammad Anwar, Illuminata Wynnie, Amil Siddik, Edy Saputra Rusdi, Mauliddin Mauliddin</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>