Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Jurnal SINTA 3

INTEGRATION OF QUADRATIC REGRESSION-ARIMA MODEL ESTIMATING AIR QUALITY INDEX ON PM2.5 CONCENTRATION

BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan · Vol. 20 No. 4 (2026) · pp. 2825–2838

DOI
10.30598/barekengvol20iss4pp2825-2838
ISSN
2615-3017, 1978-7227
Published
2026-08-24
Publisher
PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

In Air Quality Index (AQI) computation, the relationship between AQI and PM2.5 is defined through an interpolation approach, which forms a nonlinear relationship between PM2.5 and AQI, thereby rendering linear regression less capable of representing this relationship. This research selects quadratic regression because it explicitly represents the nonlinear relationship between PM2.5 and AQI while remaining easy to interpret and minimizing the risk of overfitting compared with more complex nonlinear models. However, in time series data, this model still generates residuals that violate classical assumptions due to time dependence. Hence, a hybrid modeling approach integrates quadratic regression and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) to represent nonlinear relationships while correcting the time dependence on the quadratic regression residuals. This research aims to estimate AQI based on PM2.5 in Pontianak in 2024 using the Quadratic Regression-ARIMA model, also comparing the performance of quadratic regression models and quadratic regression-ARIMA models. This research focuses on estimation and interpolation within the sample, not forecasting. The dataset consists of 366 daily observations of AQI and PM2.5 throughout 2024, obtained from the official air quality monitoring website, AQI. The analysis was carried out by estimating the AQI from PM2.5 using a Quadratic Regression model, and the regression residuals were rendered stationary before ARIMA modeling. The results showed that the Quadratic Regression-ARIMA model yields estimate with a better residual structure than the quadratic regression model. The in-sample evaluation of the Quadratic Regression-ARIMA model showed better performance, with a higher coefficient of determination of 0.95, compared with 0.91 for quadratic regression and 0.80 for linear regression.

Collaboration network of the authors

25 authors · 64 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Wirda AndaniAffiliation unknown4
Evy SulistianingsihAffiliation unknown3
Nur'ainul Miftahul HudaAffiliation unknown2
Setyo Wira RizkiAffiliation unknown2
Ray TamtamaAffiliation unknown2
Fransiskus FranAffiliation unknown1
Lisa FikadilaAffiliation unknown1
Fauziah SafitriAffiliation unknown1
Wiji UmiatiAffiliation unknown1
Dadan KusnandarAffiliation unknown1
Naomi Nessyana DebatarajaAffiliation unknown1
Cristy Framedia CahyaniAffiliation unknown1
Suryani SuryaniUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Mariatul KiftiahAffiliation unknown1
Nover LaurenAffiliation unknown1
Della ZariaAffiliation unknown1
Hendri AgustonoAffiliation unknown1
Rifki PebriyandiAffiliation unknown1
Risky GunawanAffiliation unknown1
Cinta Priscillia MaharaniAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad FikriUniversitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta1
Evy SulitianingsihAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">INTEGRATION OF QUADRATIC REGRESSION-ARIMA MODEL ESTIMATING AIR QUALITY INDEX ON  PM2.5 CONCENTRATION</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sari, Tiara Herlinda</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Yundari, Yundari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Martha, Shantika</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In Air Quality Index (AQI) computation, the relationship between AQI and PM2.5 is defined through an interpolation approach, which forms a nonlinear relationship between PM2.5 and AQI, thereby rendering linear regression less capable of representing this relationship. This research selects quadratic regression because it explicitly represents the nonlinear relationship between PM2.5 and AQI while remaining easy to interpret and minimizing the risk of overfitting compared with more complex nonlinear models. However, in time series data, this model still generates residuals that violate classical assumptions due to time dependence. Hence, a hybrid modeling approach integrates quadratic regression and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) to represent nonlinear relationships while correcting the time dependence on the quadratic regression residuals. This research aims to estimate AQI based on PM2.5 in Pontianak in 2024 using the Quadratic Regression-ARIMA model, also comparing the performance of quadratic regression models and quadratic regression-ARIMA models. This research focuses on estimation and interpolation within the sample, not forecasting. The dataset consists of 366 daily observations of AQI and PM2.5 throughout 2024, obtained from the official air quality monitoring website, AQI. The analysis was carried out by estimating the AQI from PM2.5 using a Quadratic Regression model, and the regression residuals were rendered stationary before ARIMA modeling. The results showed that the Quadratic Regression-ARIMA model yields estimate with a better residual structure than the quadratic regression model. The in-sample evaluation of the Quadratic Regression-ARIMA model showed better performance, with a higher coefficient of determination  &amp;nbsp;of 0.95, compared with 0.91 for quadratic regression and 0.80 for linear regression.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-08-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/21727</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.30598/barekengvol20iss4pp2825-2838</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan; Vol 20 No 4 (2026): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application; 2825-2838</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2615-3017</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1978-7227</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.30598/barekengvol20iss4year2026</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/barekeng/article/view/21727/13175</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2026 Tiara Herlinda Sari, Yundari Yundari, Shantika Martha</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>