Open access
Jurnal
INTEGRATING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN SECONDARY CHEMISTRY TEACHING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi · Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025) · pp. 1262–1279
ISSN 2580-2259, 2580-2240
Published 2025-08-25
Publisher LPPM Universitas Jambi
Language en
Abstract
Critical thinking (CT) is the core of the chemical education curriculum, yet it is generally in an inconsequential understanding and practice with second-level teachers. The research is a review of the previous studies of the integration of CT in teaching secondary chemistry. The research aims to find out how CT is conceptualised, taught and assessed by chemistry teachers and its consistency behind these practices. The systematic review was performed through the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. In total, 23 empirical studies of the period 2021-2025 were identified through using Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC and ScienceDirect. Important findings were extracted by thematic analysis. The Majority of teachers have an infusion style, which inserts CT into chemistry lessons based on inquiry, project-based learning, and socioscientific issues. The CT training and corresponding evaluation is scarce. Feedback and scaffolding are applied irregularly, though they are good. The beliefs of the teachers regarding the importance of CT, as well as its reality in the classroom, have a very distinct gap. Practices of assessment usually fail to respond to CT objectives. Future studies are required to come up with chemistry-specific models of CT and assessment instruments. Effective integration should be backed by professional development.
Collaboration network of the authors
12 authors ·
42 co-authorship links
· 1 across different organisations
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Universitas Jambi National Research and Innovation Agency Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/JIITUJ/oai,
first harvested 5 Nov 2026,
last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en">INTEGRATING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN SECONDARY CHEMISTRY TEACHING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW</dc:title>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Doraisamy, D Sarasvati</dc:creator>
<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Razak, Rafiza Abdul</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Critical Thinking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Instructional Strategies</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Secondary Chemistry</dc:subject>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Systematic Literature Review</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en">Critical thinking (CT) is the core of the chemical education curriculum, yet it is generally in an inconsequential understanding and practice with second-level teachers. The research is a review of the previous studies of the integration of CT in teaching secondary chemistry. The research aims to find out how CT is conceptualised, taught and assessed by chemistry teachers and its consistency behind these practices. The systematic review was performed through the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. In total, 23 empirical studies of the period 2021-2025 were identified through using Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC and ScienceDirect. Important findings were extracted by thematic analysis. The Majority of teachers have an infusion style, which inserts CT into chemistry lessons based on inquiry, project-based learning, and socioscientific issues. The CT training and corresponding evaluation is scarce. Feedback and scaffolding are applied irregularly, though they are good. The beliefs of the teachers regarding the importance of CT, as well as its reality in the classroom, have a very distinct gap. Practices of assessment usually fail to respond to CT objectives. Future studies are required to come up with chemistry-specific models of CT and assessment instruments. Effective integration should be backed by professional development.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">LPPM Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2025-08-25</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/44301</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.44301</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi; Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Volume 9, Nomor 3, September 2025; 1262-1279</dc:source>
<dc:source>2580-2259</dc:source>
<dc:source>2580-2240</dc:source>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/44301/21961</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2025 D Sarasvati Doraisamy, Rafiza Abdul Razak</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Not checked
Crossref
Not checked
Cite this article
APA 7
Doraisamy, D. S., & Razak, R. A. (2025). INTEGRATING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN SECONDARY CHEMISTRY TEACHING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(3), 1262–1279. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.44301
Copy
IEEE
D. S. Doraisamy and R. A. Razak, “INTEGRATING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN SECONDARY CHEMISTRY TEACHING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1262–1279, 2025, doi: 10.22437/jiituj.v9i3.44301.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.