Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HYBRID LSTM MODELS FOR MULTIVARIATE WATER QUALITY PREDICTION

Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi · Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026) · hlm. 2739–2758

DOI
10.22437/jiituj.v10i5.56036
ISSN
2580-2259, 2580-2240
Terbit
2026-10-31
Penerbit
LPPM Universitas Jambi
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Accurate multivariate water-quality forecasting is essential for environmental monitoring and early-warning systems. However, the comparative performance of different Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based architectures across water-quality parameters with different temporal characteristics remains insufficiently established. This study quantitatively compares five deep-learning architectures: standard LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), LSTM-GRU, CNN-LSTM, and Attention-based LSTM (AT-LSTM). The analysis uses 30,894 observations of seven water-quality parameters—chlorophyll, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, specific conductance, and turbidity—recorded at 30-minute intervals in the Brisbane River, Australia, from 4 August 2023 to 27 June 2024. We preprocessed the time-series data through missing-value imputation, Min–Max normalization, and sliding-window sequence construction. We divided the dataset into training and testing subsets using an 80:20 split, and trained the models using the Adam optimizer, mean squared error loss, and early stopping. We evaluated predictive performance using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). The results indicate that AT-LSTM achieved the best overall performance for six of the seven parameters, including temperature (R² = 0.998) and turbidity (R² = 0.636), while Bi-LSTM performed best for specific conductance (R² = 0.967). Chlorophyll and turbidity remained challenging because of their irregular fluctuations and extreme events. These findings demonstrate that model performance varies across water-quality parameters and that attention mechanisms can improve forecasting accuracy under the evaluated experimental conditions.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

12 penulis · 33 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 23 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • STMIK Bina Patria
  • Universitas Pasir Pangaraian
  • King Abdulaziz University
  • Universitas Trisakti
  • TU Bergakademie Freiberg
  • University of Bengkulu
  • Universitas Tidar
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Riza Ari RohmanUniversitas Pasir Pangaraian2
Azmi AsraUniversitas Pasir Pangaraian2
Donata Nariswari Wahyu WardaniTU Bergakademie Freiberg2
Farida YunitaSTMIK Bina Patria2
Fatkhurrochman FatkhurrochmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Muhammad FaridUniversity of Bengkulu2
Arif Rahman SalehUniversitas Tidar2

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/JIITUJ/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HYBRID LSTM MODELS FOR MULTIVARIATE WATER QUALITY PREDICTION</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Febriani, Yeza</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Amukti, Rian</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Apriniyadi, Mohammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Akhlak, Muhammad  Lutfi Mahasinul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Wiratama, Satriya Yudha</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Attention Mechanism</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Deep Learning</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Long Short-Term Memory</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Water Quality Prediction</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Accurate multivariate water-quality forecasting is essential for environmental monitoring and early-warning systems. However, the comparative performance of different Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-based architectures across water-quality parameters with different temporal characteristics remains insufficiently established. This study quantitatively compares five deep-learning architectures: standard LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM), LSTM-GRU, CNN-LSTM, and Attention-based LSTM (AT-LSTM). The analysis uses 30,894 observations of seven water-quality parameters—chlorophyll, temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity, specific conductance, and turbidity—recorded at 30-minute intervals in the Brisbane River, Australia, from 4 August 2023 to 27 June 2024. We preprocessed the time-series data through missing-value imputation, Min–Max normalization, and sliding-window sequence construction. We divided the dataset into training and testing subsets using an 80:20 split, and trained the models using the Adam optimizer, mean squared error loss, and early stopping. We evaluated predictive performance using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). The results indicate that AT-LSTM achieved the best overall performance for six of the seven parameters, including temperature (R² = 0.998) and turbidity (R² = 0.636), while Bi-LSTM performed best for specific conductance (R² = 0.967). Chlorophyll and turbidity remained challenging because of their irregular fluctuations and extreme events. These findings demonstrate that model performance varies across water-quality parameters and that attention mechanisms can improve forecasting accuracy under the evaluated experimental conditions.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">LPPM Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/56036</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/jiituj.v10i5.56036</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi; Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026): Volume 10, Nomor 5, October 2026; 2739-2758</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2259</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2240</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/jiituj.v10i5</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/56036/26002</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Yeza Febriani, Rian Amukti, Mohammad Apriniyadi, Muhammad  Lutfi Mahasinul Akhlak, Satriya Yudha Wiratama</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>