Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal

AIRPORT CAPABILITY, NOT WEATHER ALONE, SHAPES HAZE AND LOW-VISIBILITY IMPACTS ON AVIATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND HAZARD–CAPABILITY–OUTCOME FRAMEWORK

Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi · Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026) · hlm. 2478–2495

DOI
10.22437/jiituj.v10i5.58046
ISSN
2580-2259, 2580-2240
Terbit
2026-10-31
Penerbit
LPPM Universitas Jambi
Bahasa
en
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Haze, fog, smoke, and dust repeatedly reduce visibility at airports, yet evidence on their operational and safety consequences is fragmented across meteorology, environmental science, and aviation engineering. This review aimed to synthesize how haze and low-visibility conditions affect aviation operations and safety, and to identify proposed forecasting and mitigation approaches. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic literature review. We searched Scopus in June 2026 (234 records); after applying document-type and open-access filters, we screened 40 records and included 22 articles published in 2016–2026. We appraised quality with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, mapped publication patterns with Bibliometrix and VOSviewer, and synthesized findings through hybrid deductive–inductive thematic analysis. Observational (45.5%) and forecasting (22.7%) studies dominated, mostly single-airport cases in Asia and Europe. Five themes emerged: drivers of visibility deterioration (10 studies), operational impacts (8), safety impacts (7), forecasting and monitoring (5), and technological mitigation (7). Reduced visibility consistently triggered low-visibility procedures, reduced runway capacity, and increased delays, whereas safety effects were inferred rather than measured. Probabilistic and machine-learning forecasts outperformed simple baselines but were rarely linked to operational decisions, and fire-related tropical haze was under-represented. This review's novelty is a hazard–capability–outcome framework showing that airport capability, not meteorology alone, determines the size of visibility-related impacts. Airport operators and regulators should integrate probabilistic visibility forecasts and landing-system upgrades into capacity and safety planning, and haze-prone countries such as Indonesia should link fire and air-quality monitoring with aviation meteorological services.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

7 penulis · 21 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Politeknik Penerbangan Palembang
  • Meteorological, Climatological, And Geophysical Agency
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/JIITUJ/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">AIRPORT CAPABILITY, NOT WEATHER ALONE, SHAPES HAZE AND LOW-VISIBILITY IMPACTS ON AVIATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND HAZARD–CAPABILITY–OUTCOME FRAMEWORK</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pasa, Inda Tri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Pramono, Agung</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Yuniar, Dwi Candra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Adi, Kuncoro</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Hermala, Zusnita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Achaddiah, Bella Noer</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Andayani, Veronica Sinta</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Airport Operations</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Aviation Safety</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Haze</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Low Visibility</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Systematic Literature Review</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Haze, fog, smoke, and dust repeatedly reduce visibility at airports, yet evidence on their operational and safety consequences is fragmented across meteorology, environmental science, and aviation engineering. This review aimed to synthesize how haze and low-visibility conditions affect aviation operations and safety, and to identify proposed forecasting and mitigation approaches. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-guided systematic literature review. We searched Scopus in June 2026 (234 records); after applying document-type and open-access filters, we screened 40 records and included 22 articles published in 2016–2026. We appraised quality with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, mapped publication patterns with Bibliometrix and VOSviewer, and synthesized findings through hybrid deductive–inductive thematic analysis. Observational (45.5%) and forecasting (22.7%) studies dominated, mostly single-airport cases in Asia and Europe. Five themes emerged: drivers of visibility deterioration (10 studies), operational impacts (8), safety impacts (7), forecasting and monitoring (5), and technological mitigation (7). Reduced visibility consistently triggered low-visibility procedures, reduced runway capacity, and increased delays, whereas safety effects were inferred rather than measured. Probabilistic and machine-learning forecasts outperformed simple baselines but were rarely linked to operational decisions, and fire-related tropical haze was under-represented. This review's novelty is a hazard–capability–outcome framework showing that airport capability, not meteorology alone, determines the size of visibility-related impacts. Airport operators and regulators should integrate probabilistic visibility forecasts and landing-system upgrades into capacity and safety planning, and haze-prone countries such as Indonesia should link fire and air-quality monitoring with aviation meteorological services.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">LPPM Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2026-10-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/58046</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/jiituj.v10i5.58046</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi; Vol. 10 No. 5 (2026): Volume 10, Nomor 5, October 2026; 2478-2495</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2259</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-2240</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.22437/jiituj.v10i5</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/JIITUJ/article/view/58046/25975</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2026 Inda Tri Pasa, Agung Pramono, Dwi Candra Yuniar, Kuncoro Adi, Zusnita Hermala, Bella Noer Achaddiah, Veronica Sinta Andayani</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>