International television coverage of the June 2025 Iran-Israel-United States confrontation produced competing narratives about Islam and exposed ideological asymmetries in conflict journalism. This study compares how CNN International, BBC World News, and Al Jazeera English framed the twelve-day conflict and evaluates whether they represented Islamic actors and symbols as threats or as dignified. Using Entman’s four framing functions, multimodal visual analysis, and NVivo 15 Pro, the study coded twenty-one selected broadcast segments, seven from each network. Triangulation integrated verbal coding, visual semiotics, and temporal entity frequencies. Intercoder agreement reached a Cohen’s kappa of 0.78. CNN and BBC placed Iranian action at the narrative starting point in 87 percent and 75 percent of sampled segments, respectively. Both networks linked Islamic governance to security threat, yielding AIRI scores of plus 0.82 for CNN and plus 0.61 for BBC. Al Jazeera foregrounded civilian suffering, sovereignty, and Islamic dignity, producing an AIRI score of minus 0.74. Discussion: The findings show that problem definition, causal attribution, moral evaluation, and visual selection operate as an integrated frame package rather than isolated editorial choices. The Asymmetric Islamic Representation Index offers a transparent comparative measure that connects qualitative interpretation with directional representational valence. Implications: News organizations should diversify sources, disclose narrative starting points, and review visual associations between Islam and violence. These practices can strengthen pluralistic conflict reporting and reduce representational harms affecting Muslim communities while enabling future research to compare broadcasters, conflicts, and time periods systematically across media systems.
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.