Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

COMPARING NAIVE BAYES, K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR, AND NEURAL NETWORK CLASSIFICATION METHODS OF SEAT LOAD FACTOR IN LOMBOK OUTBOUND FLIGHTS

Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Komputasi · Vol. 16 No. 2 (2019) · pp. 187–198

DOI
10.20956/jmsk.v16i2.7864
ISSN
2614-8811, 1858-1382
Published
2019-12-19
Publisher
Department of Mathematics, Hasanuddin University
Language
en

Abstract

Classification is the process of grouping data based on observed variables to predict new data whose class is unknown. There are some classification methods, such as Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor and Neural Network. Naïve Bayes classifies based on the probability value of the existing properties. K-Nearest Neighbor classifies based on the character of its nearest neighbor, where the number of neighbors=k, while Neural Network classifies based on human neural networks. This study will compare three classification methods for Seat Load Factor, which is the percentage of aircraft load, and also a measure in determining the profit of airline.. Affecting factors are the number of passengers, ticket prices, flight routes, and flight times. Based on the analysis with 47 data, it is known that the system of Naïve Bayes method has misclassifies in 14 data, so the accuracy rate is 70%. The system of K-Nearest Neighbor method with k=5 has misclassifies in 5 data, so the accuracy rate is 89%, and the Neural Network system has misclassifies in 10 data with accuracy rate 78%. The method with highest accuracy rate is the best method that will be used, which in this case is K-Nearest Neighbor method with success of classification system is 42 data, including 14 low, 10 medium, and 18 high value. Based on the best method, predictions can be made using new data, for example the new data consists of Bali flight routes (2), flight times in afternoon (2), estimate of passenger numbers is 140 people, and ticket prices is Rp.700,000. By using the K-Nearest Neighbor method, Seat Load Factor prediction is high or at intervals of 80% -100%.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

22 authors · 35 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Islamic University of Indonesia
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nahdah Ghina HandayaniIslamic University of Indonesia1
Rinaldi SjahrilAffiliation unknown1
A. Sri Sartika Sufiina AhmadAffiliation unknown1
Herlinda YanasariAffiliation unknown1
Muh. Yunus SuriaAffiliation unknown1
Nur Qadri FebriantiAffiliation unknown1
Nur FaizinAffiliation unknown1
Arum Handini PrimandariAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad BariklanaAffiliation unknown1
Octavia RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Nanda Lailatul HumairahAffiliation unknown1
Ashabul Akbar MaulanaAffiliation unknown1
Alfa YulianaAffiliation unknown1
Fitri AmaliaAffiliation unknown1
Nabila Dwi FaziraAffiliation unknown1
IKA MEIZA MAHARANIAffiliation unknown1
Malecita Nur Atala SinggihAffiliation unknown1
Shazia Ayesha AzzahraAffiliation unknown1
Wiranti Nugrah AndiniAffiliation unknown1
Irwan SutisnaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jmsk/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">COMPARING NAIVE BAYES, K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR, AND NEURAL NETWORK CLASSIFICATION METHODS OF SEAT LOAD FACTOR IN LOMBOK OUTBOUND FLIGHTS</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Suliztia, Mega Luna</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Fauzan, Achmad</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Classification</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">K-Nearest Neighbor</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Naïve Bayes</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Neural Network</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Seat Load Factor</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Classification is the process of grouping data based on observed variables to predict new data whose class is unknown. There are some classification methods, such as Naïve Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbor and Neural Network. Naïve Bayes classifies based on the probability value of the existing properties. K-Nearest Neighbor classifies based on the character of its nearest neighbor, where the number of neighbors=k, while Neural Network classifies based on human neural networks. This study will compare three classification methods for Seat Load Factor, which is the percentage of aircraft load, and also a measure in determining the profit of airline.. Affecting factors are the number of passengers, ticket prices, flight routes, and flight times. Based on the analysis with 47 data, it is known that the system of Naïve Bayes method has misclassifies in 14 data, so the accuracy rate is 70%. The system of K-Nearest Neighbor method with k=5 has misclassifies in 5 data, so the accuracy rate is 89%, and the Neural Network system has misclassifies in 10 data with accuracy rate 78%. The method with highest accuracy rate is the best method that will be used, which in this case is K-Nearest Neighbor method with success of classification system is 42 data, including 14 low, 10 medium, and 18 high value. Based on the best method, predictions can be made using new data, for example the new data consists of Bali flight routes (2), flight times in afternoon (2), estimate of passenger numbers is 140 people, and ticket prices is Rp.700,000. By using the K-Nearest Neighbor method, Seat Load Factor prediction is high or at intervals of 80% -100%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Department of Mathematics, Hasanuddin University</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-12-19</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jmsk/article/view/7864</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.20956/jmsk.v16i2.7864</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Komputasi; Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): JMSK, JANUARY, 2020; 187-198</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2614-8811</dc:source>
	<dc:source>1858-1382</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/jmsk/article/view/7864/4555</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>10.20956/j.v16i2.7864.g4555</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Matematika, Statistika dan Komputasi</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>