Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Evaluation of Recognition-Based Graphical Password Schemes in Terms of Usability and Security Attributes

International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · Vol. 6 No. 6 (2016)

DOI
10.11591/ijece.v6i6.11227
ISSN
2088-8708, 2088-8708
Terbit
2016-12-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Abstrak

User Authentication is a critical component in information security. Several widely used mechanisms for security to protect services from illegal access include alphanumerical usernames passwords. However, there are several drawbacks attached in this method. For instance, the users themselves usually those passwords that are easy to guess. As difficult passwords are difficult to recall. A new alternative is the graphic-based password and there has been a growing trend in the use of such a password. The human psychology study reveals that humans find it easier to remember pictures as opposed to words. There are two main aspects to the graphical password scheme, namely security and usability. This study comprises of a comprehensive research in the current Recognition-Based graphical password schemes. The common usability attributes and possible attacks on the Recognition-Based graphical password are reviewed, identified and examined in detail. There are several previous surveys on the graphical passwords. The latest research review and summarize graphical password systems concisely and at the same time, analyze usability features for every design. However it was found that there is not a single method that has the most resounding usability attributes. Therefore, this research suggests a set of usability attributes that can be applied into a single Recognition-Based graphical password system. In addition, this study examines and compares success rates on login, login time and memorability of existing systems which are the usability measures most often reported in user studies of graphical passwords. Lastly, a comparison table is revealed to put forth the limitations and strengths of each approach in terms of security and usability.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

8 penulis · 12 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Technology Malaysia
  • Malaysia University of Science and Technology
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Rosdiana ShahrilUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
AKM Muzahidul IslamUniversity of Technology Malaysia2
Motaz HamzaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sellappan PalaniappanMalaysia University of Science and Technology1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2088-8708/works, pertama di-harvest 27 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 15 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Evaluation of Recognition-Based Graphical Password Schemes in Terms of Usability and Security Attributes</dc:title><dc:creator>Khodadadi, Touraj</dc:creator><dc:creator>Muzahidul Islam, A.K.M.</dc:creator><dc:creator>Baharun, Sabariah</dc:creator><dc:creator>Komaki, Shozo</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;User Authentication is a critical component in information security. Several widely used mechanisms for security to protect services from illegal access include alphanumerical usernames passwords. However, there are several drawbacks attached in this method. For instance, the users themselves usually those passwords that are easy to guess. As difficult passwords are difficult to recall. A new alternative is the graphic-based password and there has been a growing trend in the use of such a password. The human psychology study reveals that humans find it easier to remember pictures as opposed to words. There are two main aspects to the graphical password scheme, namely security and usability. This study comprises of a comprehensive research in the current Recognition-Based graphical password schemes. The common usability attributes and possible attacks on the Recognition-Based graphical password are reviewed, identified and examined in detail. There are several previous surveys on the graphical passwords. The latest research review and summarize graphical password systems concisely and at the same time, analyze usability features for every design. However it was found that there is not a single method that has the most resounding usability attributes. Therefore, this research suggests a set of usability attributes that can be applied into a single Recognition-Based graphical password system. In addition, this study examines and compares success rates on login, login time and memorability of existing systems which are the usability measures most often reported in user studies of graphical passwords.  Lastly, a comparison table is revealed to put forth the limitations and strengths of each approach in terms of security and usability.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher><dc:date>2016-12-01</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v6i6.11227</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.11591/ijece.v6i6.11227</dc:identifier><dc:source>International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE); Vol 6 No 6 (2016); 2939</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:source>2088-8708</dc:source><dc:relation>http://www.iaescore.com/journals/index.php/IJECE/article/viewFile/5909/5571</dc:relation><dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>